Anyone know how to reverse engineer this function so that you get a
datetime value?
Laurie
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Anyone know how to reverse engineer this function so that you get a
datetime value?
Here's the C# version that generates a SYS(2015) value. It's three
characters for the year/day and six for the milliseconds within the day:
When I was active, this was how I stayed up on software
https://mspartner.microsoft.com/en/hk/pages/membership/action-pack-subscribe
.aspx
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:49 PM
To:
Can't afford it for this project. All I need to do is restore a backup
and export data from the database.
Thanks,
On 3/31/2015 1:52 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
When I was active, this was how I stayed up on software
I tried:
change fields fieldname1+' '+fieldname2+ , fieldname3
I got a unrecog phrase/keyword in cmd error
by the way, I am running 2.6 if that is material
John
On 03/25/2015 04:44 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
I'd forgotten about CHANGE! I believe EDIT is a synonym.
Clever work-around!
On Wed,
Not sure the help is all that helpful when it comes to everyone once
knew this.
Try:
change fields fred=fieldname1+' '+fieldname2+ , fieldname3
Essential, you're creating a calculated field, fred.
It doesn't have to be named that, but it always worked for me :)
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:27
That link takes me to Amazon and SQL Server 2014 for $49.00. Can I
restore a backup of 2008 R2 into this?
The $49 is okay by me.
On 3/31/2015 2:06 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
Jeff:
FREE should be the price:
http://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/498425
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Jeff
Former Byte columnist, Microsoftie and New Hampshire resident Jon
Udell posts a blog entry on InfoWorld:
Wanted: Easy database app dev tools for the Web
Programming languages, application frameworks, SQL or NoSQL
databases, data-binding mechanisms, templating libraries -- they're
all up for
Thanks Ted. Stephen must be absent today. We miss you when you aren't
here. ;^)
On 3/31/2015 2:28 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
I yield to the other DBAs here. I consider SQL Server a read-only
product to migration to other databases. My DBA experience is a decade
out of date.
I thought there was
Or the SQL Server express 2008 R2 edition, which is what you asked for
initially!
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30438
Surprised to see these still available.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote:
I should be here less often :)
If the
Database is large.
Thanks and you better not go anywhere!
On 3/31/2015 2:35 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
Or the SQL Server express 2008 R2 edition, which is what you asked for
initially!
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30438
Surprised to see these still available.
On Tue,
I should be here less often :)
If the database isn't huge, you could probably get by with SQL Server Express:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=29062
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote:
Thanks Ted. Stephen must be absent today. We miss
I need the enterprise manager (or whatever it is called now) software
because I don't have time to learn to manipulate express.
Thanks,
On 3/31/2015 2:53 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:
Large is a relative term, Jeff. Does it exceed the capacities of the current
Express version? If not, you should
This is an example of FoxPro’s (both DOS and Windows) inconsistency and
quirkiness. Calculated columns in BROWSE, CHANGE, and EDIT commands must
always be assigned to a new variable name. Calculated columns in LIST and
DISPLAY statements must NOT be assigned to a new variable.
Just to keep
SSMS = SQL Server Management Studio. This is actually the 2008 R2 version I
just found.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=22985
And then there's the 2014 download but it's not 100% clear to me if this is
time limited in any way since the page refers to eval.
I yield to the other DBAs here. I consider SQL Server a read-only
product to migration to other databases. My DBA experience is a decade
out of date.
I thought there was discussion here on a FREE developer edition, but
now I can't locate that thread.
$49 seems like a reasonable deal.
I would
Large is a relative term, Jeff. Does it exceed the capacities of the current
Express version? If not, you should be able to just get that. And one change
over time is they also make SSMS available to Express users. It used to be SSMS
was not available so you got the engine but not the dev
Jeff:
FREE should be the price:
http://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/498425
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Jeff Johnson j...@dcsoftware.com wrote:
I need to purchase the subject software for a one time project on my
computer only. I have seen prices from $32 to 32,000 and can' t make
I need to purchase the subject software for a one time project on my
computer only. I have seen prices from $32 to 32,000 and can' t make
heads or tails of it. I purchased an earlier developer version of SQL
Server and it fit my needs perfectly. Can someone tell me the least
expensive way
A couple of days ago I stumbled over this:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh510202.aspx
It's a new form of SQL Server Express called LocalDB, and is supposed to
reduce required complexity and overhead for software developers/testers. Looks
good but I haven't investigated further.
20 matches
Mail list logo
