Dan Olsson wrote:
and still there is no OS that can
multitask as well as it could
Er ... is this the Amiga OS running on 68000-series chips? With no
memory protection? Meaning that a misbehaved program could take down the
entire system? ;)
On 6/5/07, Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Olsson wrote:
and still there is no OS that can
multitask as well as it could
Er ... is this the Amiga OS running on 68000-series chips? With no
memory protection? Meaning that a misbehaved program could take down the
entire system? ;)
On 6/5/07, Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Olsson wrote:
and still there is no OS that can
multitask as well as it could
Er ... is this the Amiga OS running on 68000-series chips? With no
memory protection? Meaning that a misbehaved program could take down the
entire system? ;)
At 2007-06-05 14:40, you wrote:
On 6/5/07, Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Olsson wrote:
and still there is no OS that can multitask as well as it could
Er ... is this the Amiga OS running on 68000-series chips? With
no memory protection? Meaning that a misbehaved program could
On 6/5/07, Dan Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it also (if that's reason) had some advantages, you could as an
example make a bootable ramdisk so you needed only to load
systemfiles after a cold start. The ramdisk survived soft reboots so
the next time you could boot up entirely from
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Looking for killer file finder
On 6/5/07, Dan Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it also (if that's reason) had some advantages, you could as an
example make a bootable ramdisk so you needed only to load
systemfiles after a cold start. The ramdisk survived soft reboots so
Of Ted Roche
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 1:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Looking for killer file finder
On 6/5/07, Dan Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it also (if that's reason) had some advantages, you could as an
example make a bootable ramdisk so you needed only to load
On 6/4/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/3/07, Dan Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I AM a registered user of Directory Opus - but that was at the
dawn of time on the Amiga - and still there is no OS that can
multitask as well as it could - on a 4.77 Mhz CPU if memory serves
Take a look at:
Funduc Software
Search and Replace
http://www.funduc.com/search_replace.htm
Gianni
- Original Message -
From: Paul Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:12:48 +0100
Subject: Looking for killer file finder
Hi all
I have been a great
Hi all
I have been a great fan of PowerDesk Pro and have lately been looking at
Directory Opus but there are some features of the old PC Tools for
Windows (or was it Norton Desktop for Windows ?) file finders that I
really miss. In particular, one could specify (and save for re-use)
At 2007-06-03 23:12, Paul Newton wrote:
I have been a great fan of PowerDesk Pro and have lately been looking at
Directory Opus but there are some features of the old PC Tools for
Windows (or was it Norton Desktop for Windows ?) file finders that I
really miss. In particular, one could specify
On 6/3/07, Dan Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I AM a registered user of Directory Opus - but that was at the
dawn of time on the Amiga - and still there is no OS that can
multitask as well as it could - on a 4.77 Mhz CPU if memory serves me right...
7 Mhz, according to Wikipedia:
Paul Newton wrote:
Hi all
I have been a great fan of PowerDesk Pro and have lately been looking at
Directory Opus but there are some features of the old PC Tools for
Windows (or was it Norton Desktop for Windows ?) file finders that I
really miss. In particular, one could specify (and
13 matches
Mail list logo
