On Thursday 08 February 2007 2:57 am, Michael Madigan wrote:
I thought you WERE a TV.
Hi Michael!
Really? How, from my web picture?
--
Regards,
Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Not you, Dicardo.
--- Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 08 February 2007 2:57 am, Michael
Madigan wrote:
I thought you WERE a TV.
Hi Michael!
Really? How, from my web picture?
--
Regards,
Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/
Michael Madigan wrote:
I thought you WERE a TV.
Now Mike, why would you say that of Pete?
--- Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 26 January 2007 10:21 am, Ricardo Aráoz
wrote:
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On 1/26/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hahahaha! Good
On Thursday 25 January 2007 5:50 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
snip
Not exactly, the teaching says that the Pope is always right when he
speaks about dogma (or something like that. Anyone with better info?).
Hi Ricardo!
That's close to it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility
--
On Friday 26 January 2007 6:57 pm, Jean Laeremans wrote:
On 1/26/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hahahaha! Good one! But you're wrong, he's the missing link between ape
and Pete.
No need to stoop to their level though
Hi Jean!
That you two should be so superior to Mike and
On Friday 26 January 2007 10:21 am, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On 1/26/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hahahaha! Good one! But you're wrong, he's the missing link between ape
and Pete.
No need to stoop to their level though
Why not! It's so funny! And
I thought you WERE a TV.
--- Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 26 January 2007 10:21 am, Ricardo Aráoz
wrote:
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On 1/26/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hahahaha! Good one! But you're wrong, he's the
missing link between ape
and Pete.
On Monday 22 January 2007 8:21 pm, Ed Leafe wrote:
snip
Recalling my catechism from my childhood, I knew that baptized
babies who died before the age of 7 were supposed to go straight to
heaven, as they didn't have the capacity to distinguish right from
wrong until that age, so they
At 07:47 PM 1/25/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
You are a Christian based on what is in your heart. If you go to a
Christian Church every Sunday, donate a lot to charity, help the poor, and
offer kindness to strangers, by all outward appearances you are a
Christian. However, if while
At 03:13 AM 1/26/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
Charlie,
Watch: http://www.thegodmovie.com
Then think.
I viewed the trailer. It appears it's a movie that claims Jesus never existed.
This attack on Christianity is not new. It has been introduced, debunked,
re-introduced, re-debunked many times in
At 07:53 PM 1/25/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
I don't know. During this discussion I imagined how I would feel if my
children were killed. Either by some tragedy or by another person. All I
can say is that I'd be grief-stricken. Maybe because I'll miss them in the
few years I have
Charlie,
What are you coming up next? That evolution has already been debunked too?
I hear all the time religious people claiming that there're plenty of
scientific evidence pointing to criationism and that simply is not true.
Criationism is a ludicrous lie.
I've watched the documentary The God
Jesus is a prophet in Islam.
Jesus is the Messiah in Christianity
To say that Jesus never existed is silly.
--- Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:13 AM 1/26/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
Charlie,
Watch: http://www.thegodmovie.com
Then think.
I viewed the trailer. It
At 07:57 PM 1/25/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
Hey! Didn't you say we have no control whatsoever over 'god's grace'?
So if there's nothing you can do to get it, then there's nothing you can
do to refuse it. Or do you question god's omnipotence?
...
I don't recall saying that.
Well if Creationism is ludicrous, where's the missing
link between ape and man?
I happen to believe in evolution and don't find it
troubling at all. I believe Adam and Eve were a
parable, as well as Noah and the Ark. This doesn't
disprove God in any way for me.
--- Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:07 PM 1/25/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
For even more fun, do you deny that God could limit Himself if He so
chose?
In other words, if He made a Covenant with humans, do you think He would
stick to it?
If he is really omnipotent, and always tells the truth (though that
At 02:57 AM 1/26/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
I believe God is real, and the Christian religion is right, based on
faith, what I've researched, and what He's done in my life.
Billions of Muslims and Hindus (among others) can say exactly the same
thing. Your God is no more real than theirs
Wow, they certainly taught you how NOT TO THINK very well...
On 1/26/07, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm a infidel.
I don't believe in God for the exact same reasons I don't believe in
Zeus,
Vishnu, Osiris, etc.
OK. What are those reasons?
--- StripMime Report --
At 03:40 PM 1/26/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
Wow, they certainly taught you how NOT TO THINK very well...
No need to be insulting. Maybe I should have been more verbose in my
question, so I'll restate it.
So you say you reject God for the exact reasons you reject the concept of
Zeus, Vishnu,
At 03:12 PM 1/26/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
Charlie,
What are you coming up next? That evolution has already been debunked too?
I hear all the time religious people claiming that there're plenty of
scientific evidence pointing to criationism and that simply is not true.
Criationism is a
Charlie,
The Bible is a piece of FOLKLORE, written by HUMANS.
Jesus' life, as told by the gospels, have an uncanny similarity with
folklore tales from other cultural traditions.
It's pretty clear it's all made up.
HW
On 1/26/07, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. I'm not
Charlie,
The very likely probability of Jesus' life being (mostly) a work of fiction
has been refuted many times, I know. But usually it has been refuted in the
same way as evolutionism has been refuted, usually with silly and
non-scientific arguments.
For example, you're claiming that
On 1/26/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well if Creationism is ludicrous, where's the missing
link between ape and man?
Had a look in the mirror lately ?
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 07:47 PM 1/25/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
You are a Christian based on what is in your heart. If you go to a
Christian Church every Sunday, donate a lot to charity, help the poor, and
offer kindness to strangers, by all outward appearances you are a
Christian.
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 07:57 PM 1/25/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
Hey! Didn't you say we have no control whatsoever over 'god's grace'?
So if there's nothing you can do to get it, then there's nothing you can
do to refuse it. Or do you question god's omnipotence?
...
I don't
Pretty interesting how that folklore held on for 2000+
years. Pretty powerful folklore.
--- Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charlie,
The Bible is a piece of FOLKLORE, written by HUMANS.
Jesus' life, as told by the gospels, have an uncanny
similarity with
folklore tales from other
Michael Madigan wrote:
Well if Creationism is ludicrous, where's the missing
link between ape and man?
I can see I shamed you enough so you won't be laying your finger over
language mistakes. Good!
I happen to believe in evolution and don't find it
troubling at all. I believe Adam and Eve
God I'm good looking!
But answer my question Frenchy.
--- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 1/26/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well if Creationism is ludicrous, where's the
missing
link between ape and man?
Had a look in the mirror lately ?
A+
jml
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 08:07 PM 1/25/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
For even more fun, do you deny that God could limit Himself if He so
chose?
In other words, if He made a Covenant with humans, do you think He would
stick to it?
If he is really omnipotent, and always tells the
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 03:12 PM 1/26/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
Charlie,
What are you coming up next? That evolution has already been debunked too?
I hear all the time religious people claiming that there're plenty of
scientific evidence pointing to criationism and that simply is not
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On 1/26/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well if Creationism is ludicrous, where's the missing
link between ape and man?
Had a look in the mirror lately ?
Hahahaha! Good one! But you're wrong, he's the missing link between ape
and Pete.
A+
jml
On 1/26/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hahahaha! Good one! But you're wrong, he's the missing link between ape
and Pete.
No need to stoop to their level though
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 03:40 PM 1/26/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
Wow, they certainly taught you how NOT TO THINK very well...
No need to be insulting. Maybe I should have been more verbose in my
question, so I'll restate it.
So you say you reject God for the exact reasons you reject
Stoop? You need a ladder to get to my ankles.
--- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 1/26/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hahahaha! Good one! But you're wrong, he's the
missing link between ape
and Pete.
No need to stoop to their level though
A+
jml
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On 1/26/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hahahaha! Good one! But you're wrong, he's the missing link between ape
and Pete.
No need to stoop to their level though
Why not! It's so funny! And they get so disoriented. Beats the TV
A+
jml
[excessive
Michael Madigan wrote:
Stoop? You need a ladder to get to my ankles.
So your neighbors finally hanged you by your ankles like they did to
Mussolini?
--- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 1/26/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hahahaha! Good one! But you're wrong,
On 1/27/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your sister said I was hung, I guess that's the same
thing.
How low can you go ?
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
Charlie,
I already said: it's a FACT that the Christian bible is a work written by
many different men, (who frequently contradicted themselves), re-told myths
from different cultural traditions, with loose links to historical events
and facts, all build up from another religion (as is always the
At 04:06 PM 1/24/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
Charlie,
Do you think the ancient Greeks, with their spectacular achievements, were
all fooling themselves by believing in Zeus, Poseidon, Apollo, etc?
What about ancient Egyptians?
What about thousands of years of chinese history and cultural
At 08:29 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
I think it has been asked of you many times in this thread, but
considering you are seemingly contradicting your statements I'll ask you
once more.
ARE YOU A CHRISTIAN BECAUSE YOU BELIEVE IN CHRISTIAN PRECEPTS OR
BECAUSE YOU ACT ACCORDING TO
On Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:03 PM Charlie Coleman wrote:
First, wouldn't you agree that in general everyone that has beliefs
view others with opposing
beliefs as wrong? The Hindus, Muslims, ancient Greeks, etc would all
view my beliefs as wrong
just as I view their beliefs as wrong. That is
At 08:56 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
Of course that's not correct. You have to be sincere
in your confession and avoid doing the same wrong
things.
Just ignorant bullshit. There have been Popes that granted certified
pardons for all sins in exchange for money or some
At 08:39 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
First, we are still human. What happens in our physical life hits us just
like it does anyone else. Next, Christian belief is that life is sacred.
When tragedies strike, our spirit mourns for the loss.
But if there's no loss, nor
At 08:42 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
Nope. By my definition you are not a Christian because you refuse to
accept
God's Grace into your heart.
Hey! Didn't you say we have no control whatsoever over 'god's grace'?
So if there's nothing you can do to get it, then there's
At 08:51 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
Some things in Biblical teaching don't sound 'fair' to me. But I will
submit my sense of fairness to God's,
Nnnnope! You will submit your sense of fairness to the biblical
teachings. Not necessarily the same thing.
Wait. I believe Biblical
At 03:13 PM 1/24/2007 -0500, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
I'm simply doing what I'm called to do by my faith.
I bet you love it when others do what they are called to do by
their
faith, too!
Jihad, anyone? ;-)
Well, you should be
At 03:16 PM 1/24/2007 -0500, Ed Leafe wrote:
At that time I think I said doing good deeds is meaningless in terms of
salvation,
but that doing good deeds is still a commendable thing. Whether or not
there is a God we should all try to do good deeds when we can.
Well, uh...
Coleman
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:22 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Gonzales warns judges not to meddle
At 08:56 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
Of course that's not correct. You have to be sincere
in your confession and avoid doing the same wrong
things.
Just
At 03:18 PM 1/25/2007 -0500, David Crooks wrote:
First, wouldn't you agree that in general everyone that has beliefs view
others with opposing
beliefs as wrong? The Hindus, Muslims, ancient Greeks, etc would all
view my beliefs as wrong
just as I view their beliefs as wrong. That is
On Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:33 PM Charlie Coleman wrote:
snipped
In a general sense, a lot of religions describe similar 'good deeds'
that should be done by the believers. That's about it where the
similarity ends.
Some of them call for forced conversion of non-believers, others say
simply to
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 08:29 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
I think it has been asked of you many times in this thread, but
considering you are seemingly contradicting your statements I'll ask you
once more.
ARE YOU A CHRISTIAN BECAUSE YOU BELIEVE IN CHRISTIAN PRECEPTS OR
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 08:56 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
Of course that's not correct. You have to be sincere
in your confession and avoid doing the same wrong
things.
Just ignorant bullshit. There have been Popes that granted certified
pardons for all sins in exchange for
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 08:39 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
First, we are still human. What happens in our physical life hits us just
like it does anyone else. Next, Christian belief is that life is sacred.
When tragedies strike, our spirit mourns for the loss.
But if
This Good deeds vs saved by grace argument is
mostly moot because I can't think of anyone who was
saved by grace and wasn't doing good deeds.
Additionally, a Catholic doing good deeds is probably
already saved by grace.
The only time this comes into play is when an Atheist
or pagan does good
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 08:42 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
Nope. By my definition you are not a Christian because you refuse to
accept
God's Grace into your heart.
Hey! Didn't you say we have no control whatsoever over 'god's grace'?
So if there's nothing you can do to
Jesus didn't choose his religion. He was born a Jew
because God chose to have him be a Jew.
--- David Crooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:33 PM Charlie
Coleman wrote:
snipped
In a general sense, a lot of religions describe
similar 'good deeds'
that should be
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 08:51 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
Some things in Biblical teaching don't sound 'fair' to me. But I will
submit my sense of fairness to God's,
Nnnnope! You will submit your sense of fairness to the biblical
teachings. Not necessarily the same thing.
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 03:13 PM 1/24/2007 -0500, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
I'm simply doing what I'm called to do by my faith.
I bet you love it when others do what they are called to do by
their
faith, too!
Jihad, anyone?
Satan was created by God and given free will.
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 08:51 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
Some things in Biblical teaching don't sound
'fair' to me. But I will
submit my sense of fairness to God's,
Nnnnope!
Michael Madigan wrote:
This Good deeds vs saved by grace argument is
mostly moot because I can't think of anyone who was
saved by grace and wasn't doing good deeds.
So if your 'big' brain can't think of it then it is out of god's power.
Additionally, a Catholic doing good deeds is
Michael Madigan wrote:
Jesus didn't choose his religion. He was born a Jew
because God chose to have him be a Jew.
And seemingly god chose you to be an (I should end it here)
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
Hmmm gloating over a man who killed millions upon
millions of people doesn't strike me as being wrong.
And I don't think the tears that you shed for him
strikes me as being right.
Laughing at your shortcomings is downright funny.
you going down for sure. I not be going down, my
brotha
And God gave you free will to try to lure other people
to Hell. Atheists and Satanists work for the same
boss.
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
Jesus didn't choose his religion. He was born a
Jew
because God chose to have him be a Jew.
And
Michael Madigan wrote:
Satan was created by God and given free will.
Actually the angel's name was Lucifer. I think Satan comes from the arab
word Shaitan which means demon.
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 08:51 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz
Michael Madigan wrote:
Hmmm gloating over a man who killed millions upon
millions of people doesn't strike me as being wrong.
Wrong? I was talking about christian or un-christian. And it is a very
un-christian attitude.
And I don't think the tears that you shed for him
strikes me as being
Michael Madigan wrote:
And God gave you free will to try to lure other people
to Hell. Atheists and Satanists work for the same
boss.
I should point I am a monarchical anarchist, it's very difficult for me
to take a master.
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan
I believe God is real, and the Christian religion is right, based on
faith, what I've researched, and what He's done in my life.
Billions of Muslims and Hindus (among others) can say exactly the same
thing. Your God is no more real than theirs because of your arguments.
Yes, I'm a infidel.
I
LOL
http://russellsteapot.com/images/rsgallery/original/Image54.jpg
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
Stephen the Cook wrote:
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
Nope. By my definition you are not a Christian because you refuse to
accept God's Grace into your heart. You flat out reject there is a
God at all (IIRC). Of course, these are my assumptions based
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
There are two meanings of 'love all'. One would be 'Love none', the
other would be love every single person.
If that's the case, if follows you love me. Speaking of which... I'm
short of money right now
I haven't won the powerball either :(
Stephen Russell
At 08:07 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
No no no. I was not trying to say or imply that all Christians are
good. In
fact, I think I made that very clear later on.
It seemed to me someone (Richardo?)
Nope. 'Richardo' is innocent of what you claim. Blaming the wrong
At 09:12 PM 1/23/2007 -0600, Stephen the Cook wrote:
...
Did anyone feel the earth quake? Charlie and I agree.
LOL!
And for those of you who have said they've never witnessed miracle, well,
you just have.
:-)
It's the personal relationship with god that creates the Christian, and not
the
You sure do have bad memory, Charlie.
On 1/24/07, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:07 PM 1/23/2007 -0300, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
...
No no no. I was not trying to say or imply that all Christians are
good. In
fact, I think I made that very clear later on.
It seemed to
On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
That's fine, but it sure isn't what Charlie is stating.
According to
him, you can love all, but if you accept his personal view of things,
you will burn in Hell. Exactly the opposite of what you state.
Whoa! Have I been that
You can't be wrong Charlie. You must believe, otherwise you're unfaithful
and will burn in hell.
BTW, do you think that billions of hindus, buddhists, etc are all deluded
persons?
On 1/24/07, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:38 PM 1/23/2007 -0500, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 23,
At 10:55 AM 1/24/2007 -0500, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
That's fine, but it sure isn't what Charlie is
stating. According to
him, you can love all, but if you accept his personal view of things,
you will burn in Hell. Exactly the opposite
At 01:42 PM 1/24/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
You sure do have bad memory, Charlie.
...
Heh. Yep. Thanks for reminding me. I forgot about that.
:-)
-Charlie
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
At 02:03 PM 1/24/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote:
You can't be wrong Charlie. You must believe, otherwise you're unfaithful
and will burn in hell.
BTW, do you think that billions of hindus, buddhists, etc are all deluded
persons?
I don't mean to sound cruel, but yes, I do believe the beliefs of the
Charlie,
Do you think the ancient Greeks, with their spectacular achievements, were
all fooling themselves by believing in Zeus, Poseidon, Apollo, etc?
What about ancient Egyptians?
What about thousands of years of chinese history and cultural tradition,
human beings doing good and bad things
On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
I'm simply doing what I'm called to do by my faith.
I bet you love it when others do what they are called to do by their
faith, too!
Jihad, anyone? ;-)
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
At that time I
think I said doing good deeds is meaningless in terms of salvation,
but
that doing good deeds is still a commendable thing. Whether or not
there is
a God we should all try to do good deeds when we can.
Well,
Michael Madigan wrote:
They'll all have their chance to accept Christ right
before the end.
Wow! That's wonderful! Please let me know where you've been sent before
I make my decision.
--- Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't be wrong Charlie. You must believe,
otherwise you're
I still doesn't understand why a so loving god would prefer to burn us alive
rather than simply ignore us.
On 1/24/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
They'll all have their chance to accept Christ right
before the end.
Wow! That's wonderful! Please let me
Fixed:
I still don't understand why a so loving god would prefer to burn us alive
rather than simply ignore us.
On 1/24/07, Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still doesn't understand why a so loving god would prefer to burn us
alive rather than simply ignore us.
On 1/24/07, Ricardo
On Jan 24, 2007, at 6:43 PM, Helio W. wrote:
I still doesn't understand why a so loving god would prefer to burn
us alive
rather than simply ignore us.
Or deliberately make us ignorant of the one thing we need to save
ourselves, and then punish us for his own design choices.
--
I'm sure you're too arrogant to take the offer.
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
They'll all have their chance to accept Christ
right
before the end.
Wow! That's wonderful! Please let me know where
you've been sent before
I make my decision.
I still doesn't understand why you doesn't understand.
--- Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still doesn't understand why a so loving god would
prefer to burn us alive
rather than simply ignore us.
On 1/24/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
I'm sure you're too arrogant to take the offer.
Unless you're going to hell...
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
They'll all have their chance to accept Christ
right
before the end.
Wow! That's wonderful! Please let me know
Michael Madigan wrote:
I still doesn't understand why you doesn't understand.
Wow! You caught Helio, who is Brazilian, making a mistake while writing
in english. Wonder how are your portuguese lessons going. BTW, will you
be as unforgiving when an english speaking person makes some other
I try to stay out of the Portugese mail groups.
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
I still doesn't understand why you doesn't
understand.
Wow! You caught Helio, who is Brazilian, making a
mistake while writing
in english. Wonder how are your portuguese
Funny thing is that Madandgay all the time writes things like precidensy
and isn't even aware of it... LOL
Well, not a surprise coming from a guy who clearly is uneducated but who
tries to teach science lessons to Krystine and Ed (both REALLY trained in
science)...
Probably Madandgay has a
Michael Madigan wrote:
I try to stay out of the Portugese mail groups.
Are you afraid of answering a simple question?
Will you be as unforgiving when an english speaking person makes some
other mistake, or will they be forgiven?
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan
What language is Portugese? LOL
On 1/24/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
I try to stay out of the Portugese mail groups.
Are you afraid of answering a simple question?
Will you be as unforgiving when an english speaking person makes some
other mistake, or
I think it's some third-world language.
--- Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What language is Portugese? LOL
On 1/24/07, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
I try to stay out of the Portugese mail groups.
Are you afraid of answering a simple
On 1/23/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hellatio,
Yes Atheists have a long history of evil. Stallin,
Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao, in fact the most evil in
history. Torquemata is the only really evil Christian
that comes to mind.
LOL! Looking back through history most evil acts have
Not by Christians, however.
--- Paul Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/23/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hellatio,
Yes Atheists have a long history of evil.
Stallin,
Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao, in fact the most evil in
history. Torquemata is the only really evil
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 6:20 PM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
Ok. Just a second. Let me ask this simple question: Do you think
Stalin was an atheist?
Yes.
Oh. Ok. Now that makes more sense. From your earlier email I didn't
gather
that you actually agreed he was an atheist.
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
But of course. What's more. I never understood why do christians
get so
angry when someone kills their children. After all they are innocent,
they'll go straight to heaven. And this wonderful killer who
sacrifices
his
Michael Madigan wrote:
Hellatio,
Yes Atheists have a long history of evil. Stallin,
Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao, in fact the most evil in
history. Torquemata is the only really evil Christian
that comes to mind.
Hey matey! It's Torquemada, and he was a defender of the faith. The only
evil
Michael Madigan wrote:
I proudly believe in the Resurrection. It's not too
late for you.
Oh well! If you 'proudly' believe then it's ok. For a moment I thought
you just believed. But 'proudly' believe... that's the real thing.
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
