= -Original Message-
= From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
= Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 13:02
= To: ProFox Email List
= Subject: Re: [OT] Hottest year of the in the last 100 years? 1933.
=
= On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote:
=
= Ed
= -Original Message-
= From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan
= Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 11:20
= To: ProFox Email List
= Subject: [OT] Hottest year of the in the last 100 years? 1933.
=
= From June 1 to August 31, 1930, 21 days had high
=
On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Hal Kaplan wrote:
You cannot use Washington, D.C. as the basis of an exemplar for any
climatological analysis. Local geographical and atmospheric
conditions are an important part of climate. For example, New York
City has several weather observation posts and
Ed, if you are going to include my scrawls in your message, please
include all of it.
The only reason I responded was to explain why D.C. is a bad place and
you left that part out.
Thank you.
HALinNY
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote:
Ed, if you are going to include my scrawls in your message, please
include all of it.
The only reason I responded was to explain why D.C. is a bad place and
you left that part out.
Um, Hal, I was agreeing with you, and adding additional
From: Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, August 04, 2006 10:01 am
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote:
Ed, if you are going to include my scrawls in your message, please
include all of it.
The only reason I responded was to explain
!
! On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote:
!
! Ed, if you are going to include my scrawls in your message, please
! include all of it.
!
! The only reason I responded was to explain why D.C. is a
! bad place and
! you left that part out.
!
! Um, Hal, I was agreeing with
Madigan,
That summer has never been approached, and
it's not going to be approached this year.
So? It has nothing to do with whether I am going to judge the conclusions of
the Cato Institute as having a better reliability than other more respected
institutions for environmental studies.
As we
Neither is the caca that you quote, namely algore
--- Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Madigan,
That summer has never been approached, and
it's not going to be approached this year.
So? It has nothing to do with whether I am going to
judge the conclusions of
the Cato
9 matches
Mail list logo
