On 2017-06-08 16:09, Richard Kaye wrote:
Salesforce? I cringe every time I have to use it. There's nothing
particularly intuitive about it, imho, at least out of the box.
I've not used Salesforce but their marketing youtube demo looked
impressive I thought. Then again, actually working with
At 13:09 2017-06-08, Richard Kaye wrote:
Salesforce? I cringe every time I have to use it. There's nothing
particularly intuitive about it, imho, at least out of the box.
set friday on
For starters, it does not come in a box, right?
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene
At 12:56 2017-06-08, Ted Roche wrote:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> I see plenty of Webpages that have been (mis)designed by others that
> are a horror to use. I do not like the poor UX.
>
> While Webpages can be
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote:
>
> I like the interface, looks really good and fast.
> Can you program hot keys?
> What about security?
> ---
For us, security is via AD creds that are demanded when you open the
application.
Before I say yes
On 08/06/17 22:49, Stephen Russell wrote:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote:
Nice form!
Couple of questions. Can you program hot keys so as to not use the mouse
to save the order for example?
And I'd like to know the language you use to program this app.
Nice form!
Couple of questions. Can you program hot keys so as to not use the mouse
to save the order for example?
And I'd like to know the language you use to program this app. Or should
I say languages? And what about security, do you have to take care of it
or does the language/framework
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> Salesforce? I cringe every time I have to use it. There's nothing
> particularly intuitive about it, imho, at least out of the box.
>
This is the system I use, LN, and how to place a sales order.
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: e: [NF] PyQT for desktop applications
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko <ge...@telus.net> wrote:
>
> In the end, both mediums can be crafted and form great pieces of art. The
>> petty bickering between the artist gets redun
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> I see plenty of Webpages that have been (mis)designed by others that
> are a horror to use. I do not like the poor UX.
>
> While Webpages can be great, etc., they all too often not only are not
> great but are
At 09:44 2017-06-07, Edward Leafe wrote:
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low
the bar got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of
that would have NEVER
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> In the end, both mediums can be crafted and form great pieces of art. The
>> petty bickering between the artist gets redundant after a while.
>>
>
> While Webpages can be great, etc., they all too often not only are
At 05:14 2017-06-07, Stephen Russell wrote:
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> At 21:28 2017-06-06, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the
On 2017-06-07 12:44, Edward Leafe wrote:
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar
got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would
have NEVER been tolerated in a
rofoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: e: [NF] PyQT for desktop applications
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
> set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that woul
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
> set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would have NEVER
> been tolerated in a desktop app.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> At 21:28 2017-06-06, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
>> set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar
> got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would
> have NEVER been tolerated in a desktop app.
A lot of that was due to the previously mentioned mess that was and is
browser support. Things are a
At 21:28 2017-06-06, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
[snip]
I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the
bar got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that
would have NEVER been tolerated in a desktop app.
But Web app UX has
On 2017-06-06 13:26, Brant E. Layton wrote:
One more point for the desktop application: Navigation.
I've worked with many applications that are intense data entry - and
the best ones can be 'driven' entirely from the keyboard. You don't
have to reach for the mouse to make selections, etc. Of
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
>
> I also find that Web forms are often laid out badly. They can not
> count on a screen size so they go with the one-per-line model:
> Data Item 1: _
> Data Item 2: _
>
20 matches
Mail list logo