+1
It's always good to know I use the same methodology as a master. :-)
John Weller
07976 393631
01380 723235
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Aug 2017, at 08:44, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
> Mike,
> I agree with reasoning, but I have a slightly different methodology in that
>
Mike,
I agree with reasoning, but I have a slightly different methodology in that all
table/database variables AREN'T designated with a type prefix but all
programming variables are. This way there is never any confusion as I reckon
that the name in a table should only reflect the contents not
That surprises me. I'll do some more tests.
Laurie
On 1 August 2017 at 04:43, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> At 03:34 2017-07-31, Laurie Alvey wrote:
>
>> SET DECIMALS TO n only works when SET FIXED is ON.
>>
>
> I just tried it. It works regardless of the
Hi Mike
I've seen that error before in my MAPI emailing programs on new
workstations.
When Office is installed via a non-DVD method, then the WIN.INI file
does not always get updated for MAPI.
Try adding this to that Windows 10 file:
C:\Windows\win.ini
[Mail]
CMCDLLNAME32=mapi32.dll
On 2017-08-01 15:58, Ted Roche wrote:
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:45 PM,
wrote:
I also get that error OUTSIDE of the application trying to email. I
created
a test.txt file on the desktop, right-click and say "Send to Mail
Recipient"
and I get this
CCleaner to me is the nuclear option with any problem.
It's more likely Win 10 trying to pimp it's crappy Windows Store apps.
Is it 32-bit Outlook?
Have you tried
http://www.officetooltips.com/office/tips/how_to_modify_default_mail_client_in_windows_10.html
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke
That was a really interesting article so I took the example, expanded it to
include an object property and ran the test on my system.
Here are my results:
-
y=1
nsec=SECONDS()
FOR i = 1 to 100
* x=y && Results: 0.377
*
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:45 PM,
wrote:
>
> I also get that error OUTSIDE of the application trying to email. I created
> a test.txt file on the desktop, right-click and say "Send to Mail Recipient"
> and I get this message. I go into the Default
On 2017-08-01 15:42, Alan Bourke wrote:
CCleaner to me is the nuclear option with any problem.
It's more likely Win 10 trying to pimp it's crappy Windows Store apps.
Is it 32-bit Outlook?
Have you tried
Dave,
> Personally I am not a fan of the "M." prefix and find it unnecessary.
without the m.Prefix it is impossible to build a generic procedure /
application.
Regards,
Koen
2017-08-01 10:25 GMT+02:00 John Weller :
> +1
>
> It's always good to know I use the same
To contribute to the topic drift, maybe we can talk about TABs vs SPACES
next... (I'm an m dot guy. Ambiguity only contributes in horseshoes and hand
grenades... ;-)
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Koen Piller
Sent:
I know a lot of FileMaker developers that are abandoning FM because of the
outlandish licensing fees that FM/Apple are now charging.
Here's a blog post (from 2015) about looking for a new development platform and
eventually returning to Xojo. http://timdietrich.me/blog/going-with-xojo/
Web,
On 2017-08-01 03:44, Dave Crozier wrote:
Mike,
I agree with reasoning, but I have a slightly different methodology in
that all table/database variables AREN'T designated with a type prefix
but all programming variables are. This way there is never any
confusion as I reckon that the name in a
On 2017-08-01 09:21, Stephen Russell wrote:
I just got a custom Access application that our product development
team
contracted out.
Every table in the damn mdf file starts with tbl
Just letting you know that fox doesn't own the idea that type
has
to be baked into everything.
Yeah I
I agree with reasoning, but I have a slightly different methodology
I actually have my own methodology; I just failed to follow it. I
personally find type abbreviations to be difficult to read and
interpret quickly. For generic variables I usually just prefix "the",
ie. thefile, thefolder,
There was a big discussion on FoxWiki about using m dot. I think the
community was pretty polarised.
Laurie
On 1 August 2017 at 14:19,
wrote:
> On 2017-08-01 03:44, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
>> Mike,
>> I agree with reasoning, but I have a slightly
==
ProFox List Statistics
July 2017
==
Subscriber Count at End of Month:
ProFox: 288
ProFoxTech: 185
==
Total Posts: 340
On 2017-08-01 05:06, Dave Crozier wrote:
Mike,
Used it a lot but there are runtime charges as it is definitely NOT a
royalty free product like VFP.
The language itself is very quirky and lots of things are done in
weird and wonderful ways. As for the multi platform then yes it does
work but
On 2017-08-01 06:36, Ted Roche wrote:
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Dave Crozier
wrote:
Used it a lot but there are runtime charges as it is definitely NOT a
royalty free product like VFP.
The language itself is very quirky and lots of things are done in
weird and
I just got a custom Access application that our product development team
contracted out.
Every table in the damn mdf file starts with tbl
Just letting you know that fox doesn't own the idea that type has
to be baked into everything.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
On 2017-08-01 10:00, Ken Dibble wrote:
A member of the VFP Team (I can't remember his name; he was the guy
who "took out the slow parts" from various subsystems for VFP 8 and 9)
wrote a blog article explaining that without the M. prefix, the system
MUST compare every variable referenced to every
Mike,
Used it a lot but there are runtime charges as it is definitely NOT a royalty
free product like VFP.
The language itself is very quirky and lots of things are done in weird and
wonderful ways. As for the multi platform then yes it does work but using a
Filemaker server is almost
FileMaker Pro Advanced allows royalty free, cost more to purchase the Advanced
version, still not as nice as VFP.
Bryant
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
> Mike,
> Used it a lot but there are runtime charges as it is definitely NOT a
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Used it a lot but there are runtime charges as it is definitely NOT a royalty
> free product like VFP.
>
> The language itself is very quirky and lots of things are done in weird and
> wonderful ways.
Now, are we
+1, what John said!
Paul H. Tarver
Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.
Email: p...@tpcqpc.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of John
Weller
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 3:25 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: GETFILE() Returns
+1
Although I generally only apply HN naming convention to variables only and
skip the convention on tables and fields. At most on fields, I'll use a
prefix to designate the type of table such as "xref_" for cross reference
lookup tables, etc.
Paul H. Tarver
Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.
It always seems to me that using a naming convention on a table was
redundant at best because every table is a table.
However, if you are doing a large project with a lot of tables, using a
prefix can help you group similar tables together. For example, if you are
building a complete accounting
On Tue, 1 Aug 2017, at 04:01 PM, Koen Piller wrote:
> without the m.Prefix it is impossible to build a generic procedure /
> application.
>
Could you elaborate? I haven't used m. since FoxPro 2.6 days and don't
seem to have an issue creating generic functionality.
--
Alan Bourke
On 2017-07-25 13:35, Alan Bourke wrote:
You may be confusing this with when the Outlook security model started
throwing up an 'allow/deny' confirmation when an external programme
attempts to create a message using Simple MAPI. A kludgy way around
that
is to install a utility called ClickYes
That's when I joined the m dot team. If Calvin recommended it, it seemed like
good advice.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ken Dibble
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 2:30 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: GETFILE()
I remember!! It was Calvin Hsia! Here's the blog article:
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/calvin_hsia/2004/12/14/foxpro-performance-tip-field-name-lookup-for-tables/
Ken
On 2017-08-01 10:00, Ken Dibble wrote:
A member of the VFP Team (I can't remember his name; he was the guy
who "took out
On 2017-07-26 11:06, Alan Bourke wrote:
It offered SMTP, MAPI, and Extended
MAPI.
If you can make it use Extended MAPI then you shouldn't have an issue
sending with Outlook.
computer specs: Windows 10 Professional, 64-bit
I tried using Simple OR Extended MAPI but I get this error:
On 2017-07-26 04:27, Dave Crozier wrote:
In Exchange you can set up a trusted adapter (IP address) that will
accept SMTP directly into the mailserver either authenticated or
unauthenticated.
Dave
Dave -- this is out of my normal zone. Is that IP address the
workstation's IP address, or
33 matches
Mail list logo