Re: CHRSAW() doesn't always return a logical

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > Ted Roche wrote on 2015-11-25: >> What Does The HackFox Say? >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Tracy Pearson > wrote: > Ted, > > The version I have doesn't give any warnings in the

Happy Thanksgiving To All...

...or at least to those here that celebrate it. And - you KNOW that Turkey can NOT out run the FOX! {See - now I'm On Topic!} Regards, Kurt Wendt Consultant GLOBETAX 90 Broad Street New York, NY 10004-2205, U.S.A. Tel. +1-212-747-9100 Fax. +1-212-747-0029 Email:

Re: Happy Thanksgiving To All...

Jeez! What the Heck is Vicar? A Brit thing? I thought that was a Catholic thing!?!? Am on crappy cell w/slow connect - so, no Googling 4 me... :-) -K- Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 25, 2015, at 6:23 PM, Alan Bourke wrote: > > > Happy Thanksgiving and as ever, not

Re: Happy Thanksgiving To All...

Happy Thanksgiving and as ever, not too much sherry with the vicar guys. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, at 07:03 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote: > ...or at least to those here that celebrate it. > > And - you KNOW that Turkey can NOT out run the FOX! > >

CHRSAW() doesn't always return a logical

>From time to time during a process to gather data for a report, we check CHRSAW(). IF CHRSAW() ... ENDIF Our error logging is capturing Error 11 - Function argument value, type, or count is invalid. This is happening on the IF CHRSAW() line. I'm curious if others see this. I

Re: CHRSAW() doesn't always return a logical

What Does The HackFox Say? :) On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > >From time to time during a process to gather data for a report, we check > CHRSAW(). > > IF CHRSAW() > ... > ENDIF > > Our error logging is capturing Error 11 - Function

Re: CHRSAW() doesn't always return a logical

Hi Tracy, I've used chrsaw() in the past, and never had problems. The only thing I can think of is, what if you force a value of zero? Chrsaw(0) Never used this way, but the error mention function argument, value, type or count. On the other side, couldn't this be and error that is masked by

RE: CHRSAW() doesn't always return a logical

Ted Roche wrote on 2015-11-25: > What Does The HackFox Say? > > :) > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: >>> From time to time during a process to gather data for a report, we check >> CHRSAW(). >> >> IF CHRSAW() >> ... >> ENDIF

RE: Multiuser VFP9 application served on Win Pro share?

+1 for what Mike says, the same is true for Windows 8 and 8.1 as well. Dave -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Mike Copeland Sent: 24 November 2015 17:55 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: Multiuser VFP9 application served on Win Pro share? My

Re: Multiuser VFP9 application served on Win Pro share?

While it takes some work to switch over, it's absolutely the better way to go. Mike Alan Bourke wrote: My experience has been that up to 10 shares are permitted on a Windows computer. So unless you purchase the Windows server and CALS, you'll need to switch to a Linux SAMBA share setup when

Re: Multiuser VFP9 application served on Win Pro share?

> My experience has been that up to 10 shares are permitted on a Windows > computer. So unless you purchase the Windows server and CALS, you'll need > to switch to a Linux SAMBA share setup when you need 15 or 20 or more > shares on a single DBF file. Or use a database server as the back end. --

Re: Array passing Suggestions...

The way I pass stuff around between forms/objects is a bit convoluted but works fine. I do this: 1. Create a local cursor populated with the data I want to pass. 2. From that cursor, create a XML string using CURSORTOXML(), (lcXML) 3. The calling object issues DO FORM myform WITH lcXML. 4. The

Re: Multiuser VFP9 application served on Win Pro share?

I wish switching them to a database server was an option. Unfortunately, this is a commercial accounting package. I'm lucky that they just upgraded from FP DOS and are on a version now that is VFP9 with VFP9 tables. On 11/25/2015 07:14 AM, Alan Bourke wrote: My experience has been that up to

Re: Multiuser VFP9 application served on Win Pro share?

It really sounds like this is a question of whether they can save money by running as a peer-to-peer workgroup rather than a small server-workstation domain. Realistically, the answer is "no." You pay one way, or you pay another. Since this is a question about whether a commercial VFP accounting

RE: Array passing Suggestions...

I do the same thing but using XMLAdapter at both ends (calling form and called form) The advantage is that you can pass several cursors simultaneously to the called form ** in the calling form local oXML,cXML oXML = CreateObject("XMLAdapter")