@M Picture Clause in Textbox
Hello all, is there a way to have a selection in a text box similar to like we can with the get clause? Sample: lc_file= Current @ 2, 10 GET lc_file ; PICTURE @M Current, History, Both Can we use the @M in a form's text box that will allow us to press the space bar and choose only between the 3 selections in the @M list ? Thanks, Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
@M Picture Clause in Textbox
Hello all, is there a way to have a selection in a text box similar to like we can with the get clause? Sample: lc_file= Current @ 2, 10 GET lc_file ; PICTURE @M Current, History, Both Can we use the @M in a form's text box that will allow us to press the space bar and choose only between the 3 selections in the @M list ? Thanks, Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Determine if no activity in VFP App Screen
Hello all, Does anyone have a method or API call to determine if a user has had no activity on the active screen on a workstation? (actually in a Terminal Server session) ? I have a customer, who already has Terminal Server set to decide if no activity has taken place for 2 hours, then it logs off the session, but then it bombs out the VFP app and messes up things. I need to have something on the VFP app to determine if there has been no activity in this session for 1 HOUR and then gracefully log off my app BEFORE the T.S. session shuts down because of inactivity. I'm not looking for a data related determination, but more so activity on the screen or something in Windows API to determine this if possible. Thanks, Philip B. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Determine if no activity in VFP App Screen
Hi Michael, thanks for asking... I actually have a customer using an app that keeps track of flags in the system when they are logged in. Some users are leaving the app up and running in T.S. and then leave for the evening instead of logging off. They set T.S. to forcibly close down the app and the T.S. session after 2 hours of inactivity on T.S. This is leaving the software with the flags of usage still set internally yada yada... Since my first email I've been experimenting with a timer on the particular form, that will shut the app down and I am resetting the timer in the following events of the form: 1) MouseDown() 2) KeyPress() 3) Moved() I think this is actually what will allow me to do what I want to do now. Thanks though, Philip MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Philip Borkholder wrote: Hello all, Does anyone have a method or API call to determine if a user has had no activity on the active screen on a workstation? (actually in a Terminal Server session) ? I have a customer, who already has Terminal Server set to decide if no activity has taken place for 2 hours, then it logs off the session, but then it bombs out the VFP app and messes up things. I need to have something on the VFP app to determine if there has been no activity in this session for 1 HOUR and then gracefully log off my app BEFORE the T.S. session shuts down because of inactivity. I'm not looking for a data related determination, but more so activity on the screen or something in Windows API to determine this if possible. Thanks, Philip B. Hi, Philip. It doesn't help with your question really (sorry!), but this is another reason why I favor the disconnected approach, similar to what Charlie Coleman uses. Then again, it's easier for me since I'm not using VFP on the backend anymore, but instead MySQL. Let me take a stab at helping you: Are you looking to somehow keep your app alive by simulating some sort of activity so that the TS doesn't disconnect? Perhaps something in a timer where you move the mouse a fraction of a foxel (...iow, a super small unit)? Good luck! --Michael [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Determine if no activity in VFP App Screen
Hi Mike, Yes that would work under other circumstances, however this is a resell app, with my own custom mods inside it. I don't have the full control of the on shutdown assignments. thanks though, Philip Michael Madigan wrote: Isn't there an on shutdown or on logoff routine built into foxpro? Wouldn't that work? --- On Wed, 11/5/08, MB Software Solutions General Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: MB Software Solutions General Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Determine if no activity in VFP App Screen To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Wednesday, November 5, 2008, 3:48 PM Philip Borkholder wrote: Hello all, Does anyone have a method or API call to determine if a user has had no activity on the active screen on a workstation? (actually in a Terminal Server session) ? I have a customer, who already has Terminal Server set to decide if no activity has taken place for 2 hours, then it logs off the session, but then it bombs out the VFP app and messes up things. I need to have something on the VFP app to determine if there has been no activity in this session for 1 HOUR and then gracefully log off my app BEFORE the T.S. session shuts down because of inactivity. I'm not looking for a data related determination, but more so activity on the screen or something in Windows API to determine this if possible. Thanks, Philip B. Hi, Philip. It doesn't help with your question really (sorry!), but this is another reason why I favor the disconnected approach, similar to what Charlie Coleman uses. Then again, it's easier for me since I'm not using VFP on the backend anymore, but instead MySQL. Let me take a stab at helping you: Are you looking to somehow keep your app alive by simulating some sort of activity so that the TS doesn't disconnect? Perhaps something in a timer where you move the mouse a fraction of a foxel (...iow, a super small unit)? Good luck! --Michael [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Determine if no activity in VFP App Screen
Bingo John! That is the route I've taken! :) Thanks Philip Anthony J. Gundrum wrote: An off-the cuff thought here is to add a timer to the main form that resets itself whenever there is activity in the application. If the timer reaches the 1 hour mark then have it call the log off procedure. John G. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Ellenoff Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 23:50 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: Determine if no activity in VFP App Screen Expanding on Allen's idea here -- anytime Windows is shutting down it sends shutdown messages to all running applications so that they can do housecleaning. You can have VFP bind to this message (assuming you're running VFP9) and have your app close itself down as Windows is closing down as well. I don't have time at the moment to look further into the details for you, but if you decide you like this approach and get stuck, I'll see if I can find more of the details. Steve At 09:19 AM 11/05/2008, you wrote: I wonder if terminal server gives of a windows message. I would have thought so. If so maybe a bindevents might do the trick Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Hello all, Does anyone have a method or API call to determine if a user has had no activity on the active screen on a workstation? (actually in a Terminal Server session) ? I have a customer, who already has Terminal Server set to decide if no activity has taken place for 2 hours, then it logs off the session, but then it bombs out the VFP app and messes up things. I need to have something on the VFP app to determine if there has been no activity in this session for 1 HOUR and then gracefully log off my app BEFORE the T.S. session shuts down because of inactivity. I'm not looking for a data related determination, but more so activity on the screen or something in Windows API to determine this if possible. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Exceed! Basic
Hello all, Is anyone familiar with Exceed! Basic? It is apparently in VFP. Does anyone have the data structure listing? I need to export my application's data to it's structure. I wanted to do some homework here before diving into it. Thanks, Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Automating
Hi all, (It's been a long time) Does anyone know if it is possible to automate MS Paint in VFP ? I am trying to print Foxpro Report to a JPG file using the Report Listener, then would like to open that JPG up in MS Paint, rotate it 90 degrees, save it then have it pull into another report form as a graphic in foxpro. Anyone do anything like this before? Or is it possible to rotate the output using the Report Listener? Thanks, Philip B. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Excel 2007: Importing into VFP 9
Hello all, Has anyone successfully imported an excel sheet from Office 2007 with the newer extensions? Thanks, Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Excel 2007: Importing into VFP 9
Well that stinks. :) Tracy Pearson wrote: Not an import. OLE DB (Doesn't always get the right data types) and Automation have been the only way for 2007. Or open it in 2007 and save as an older version. Tracy -Original Message- From: Philip Borkholder Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1:05 PM Hello all, Has anyone successfully imported an excel sheet from Office 2007 with the newer extensions? Thanks, Philip [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Excel 2007: Importing into VFP 9
Thanks Tracy (and Craig) I'll take a look at this. Tracy Pearson wrote: Craig Boyd has a recent blog about this subject: http://www.sweetpotatosoftware.com/SPSBlog/PermaLink,guid,6b9d4c6f-76bb- -8d5b-9e321c605534.aspx or http://tinyurl.com/3qzv38 Tracy -Original Message- From: Philip Borkholder Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1:14 PM Well that stinks. :) [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
using Access to open VFP 9 DBC via ODBC
Hey All, I've been trying to connect to VFP 9 database containers from Access and am getting an error that does not recognize the tables as tables. Using the ODBC Visual Foxpro Database driver. Anyone know what to do to connect Access to VFP 9 databases? Here's the error I get: Could not execute query; could not find linked table. [Microsoft][ODBC Visual FoxPro driver]Not a table.(#123) Thanks, Philip --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@automationplus.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP 9 and ODBC for Access
Hey All, I've been trying to connect to VFP 9 database containers from Access and am getting an error that does not recognize the tables as tables. Using the ODBC Visual Foxpro Database driver. Anyone know what to do to connect Access to VFP 9 databases? Thanks, Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Calling Acrobat Reader Automation via VFP
Is there anyone that has successfully found an alternate Automation process via VFP to create an Acrobat Reader object then open a PDF and print selected pages from the PDF using the PrintRage() method? I can't get the automation to work for Acrobat... are there equivalent programs out there that can be used in automation in VFP to open and print individual pages from the PDF ? Thanks, Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Calling Acrobat Reader Automation via VFP
Thanks Allen, i looked on their site however it seems to have tools for only printing to a PDF Driver. I'm looking for an alternate to Reader to print the actual PDF from VFP (not to a pdf). Anyone else know of an alternate to API calls to Adobe Reader or how to get Adobe Reader to work in Automation? Thanks, Allen wrote: software602.com had one and an api. Dont know if they still have the api. It was simple but it worked. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Sent: 29 November 2007 17:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Calling Acrobat Reader Automation via VFP Is there anyone that has successfully found an alternate Automation process via VFP to create an Acrobat Reader object then open a PDF and print selected pages from the PDF using the PrintRage() method? I can't get the automation to work for Acrobat... are there equivalent programs out there that can be used in automation in VFP to open and print individual pages from the PDF ? No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1158 - Release Date: 28/11/2007 21:11 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Running EXE Name
Hey all, Anyone know the VFP code or Windows API to be able to find out what runtime EXE is running the code? Reason being, I am working with an application that calls a PRG from two different VFP Runtime EXE's. I would like different behavior depending on which EXE is calling it. (Sending new parameters from the EXEs is not an option right now) Thanks, Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4bb2642f.4050...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Running EXE Name
Thanks Guys, Both of the results worked just great!! I am going to use: JUSTFNAME(_VFP.ServerName) Cheers, -Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4bb4ceae.8080...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP and MS ACCESS API
Hi All, It's been a long time... Is there a way in VFP code to see if MS Access is already running with a DB open? If so, can I capture that instance and assign it to an object variable so I can control it? Thanks, Philip B. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a285543.2000...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP and MS ACCESS API
Hey Thanks Dave, That is the command I was looking for. I had remembered seeing something like this before but never had to use it then... THANKS!!! Have a great weekend! -Philip Dave Crozier wrote: Philip, Sorry I hit the send button too soon. Also, using only VFP calls, if you use Automation then CreateObject() will always open a new version of the application whereas GetObject() will open an existing version and you could then always use automation to see if the databases is open already. If you decide to use Automation extensively then I suggest Tamar's book Microsoft Office Automation with Visual Foxpro from Will at Hentzenwerke. Although she doesn't cover Access in the book there is extensive coverage of the models that M$ use for Word, Excel and Powerpoint and the techniques remain the same for Access. Dave C -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Sent: 05 June 2009 00:14 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: VFP and MS ACCESS API Hi All, It's been a long time... Is there a way in VFP code to see if MS Access is already running with a DB open? If so, can I capture that instance and assign it to an object variable so I can control it? Thanks, Philip B. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a29717e.9090...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: What if George Tiller was murdered by bdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad?
Well, I think Dr. Tiller would still be dead, and it would be treated as a terrorist act rather than a murder by some Neanderthal. Michael Madigan wrote: What would have happened if abortion doctor George Tiller was murdered by Muslim terrorist Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad? Would the media have covered it? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a311f55.2010...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Re: What if George Tiller was murdered by bdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad?
Well, I think Dr. Tiller would still be dead, and it would be treated as a terrorist act rather than a murder by some Neanderthal. Michael Madigan wrote: What would have happened if abortion doctor George Tiller was murdered by Muslim terrorist Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad? Would the media have covered it? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a311f67.60...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: DynamicBackColor in Grid Column
Hi Ted,
yes, the speed was ok before I put the condition in the columns.
heres is my code:
.DYNAMICBACKCOLOR = [IIF(csrOpen-outcol={} OR
csrOpen-incol={},RGB(255,255,0),THIS.BACKCOLOR)]
It's strange because I've used dynamicbackcolor many times before. This
time I'm customizing existing screens in an application the customer had
purchased from someone else.
Any ideas on maybe the screen repainting itself or something?
Thanks,
Philip
Ted Roche wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Philip Borkholderplbor...@netzero.net
wrote:
Does anyone know why when I put a condition in the DynamicBackcolor on
grid columns the whole screen is now taking for ever to refresh and it's
almost like something is spinning before you can click on a column...
Does it repaint itself several times?
is there a setting to stop this time consumption?
What's the expression you have in the DynamicBackColor?
If you remove it, can you click on a column immediately?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a40e28f.9000...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: DynamicBackColor in Grid Column
SCRATCH THAT. :)
Today it is running just fine!
Must have been coincidental last night and something else must have
kicked in on the server to slow things done... geeezzz :)
-Philip
Philip Borkholder wrote:
Hi Ted,
yes, the speed was ok before I put the condition in the columns.
heres is my code:
.DYNAMICBACKCOLOR = [IIF(csrOpen-outcol={} OR
csrOpen-incol={},RGB(255,255,0),THIS.BACKCOLOR)]
It's strange because I've used dynamicbackcolor many times before. This
time I'm customizing existing screens in an application the customer had
purchased from someone else.
Any ideas on maybe the screen repainting itself or something?
Thanks,
Philip
Ted Roche wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Philip Borkholderplbor...@netzero.net
wrote:
Does anyone know why when I put a condition in the DynamicBackcolor on
grid columns the whole screen is now taking for ever to refresh and it's
almost like something is spinning before you can click on a column...
Does it repaint itself several times?
is there a setting to stop this time consumption?
What's the expression you have in the DynamicBackColor?
If you remove it, can you click on a column immediately?
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a40e377.8010...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] When should you not tweet?
Definately should win a Darwin award this year Michael Madigan wrote: One less idiot to breed! --- On Fri, 6/19/09, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: [OT] When should you not tweet? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, June 19, 2009, 5:45 PM http://www.austriantimes.at/index.php?id=14023 -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a41411d.5040...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] NY Times radical leftist article written by Obama at Columbia
Great article Mike, Now he's showing how consistent he is with his beliefs and finally having the balls to work with the leaders of Russia to lead by example and reduce this ridiculous, unnecessary stock pile of nukes. Oh, and no, that position is not a leftist position, Henry Kissinger has been pushing for this for a long time too. take care Mike, -Philip Michael Madigan wrote: This creep is president. Unbelievable. http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/images/nytint/docs/obama-s-1983-college-magazine-article/original.pdf * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a536cbc.8010...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ?
Michael, :) (shoe-fly pie man) It's more like, why did humans decide to write this text into a book over 2000 years ago... claiming God told them to... :) Way before the US existed... and way before elections existed with only 2 parties... way before... umm... point made. :) -Philip Michael Madigan wrote: No, I doubt the faith of someone who dismisses it out of hand. There's a reason God gave Saint John a vision, it was to warn the believers. IF you're not even going to discuss it, then why did God bother? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 5:02 AM is that a serious comment? you doubt the faith of anyone who disbelieves obama is the antichrist??? perhaps re-reading the Bible might be of some help to you. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 31 July 2009 3:03 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? I don't take seriously a man who professes to be Christian who dismisses out of hand that Obama is the AntiChrist. Someone has to be the AntiChrist and Obama is starting to fit the mold. --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 11:22 PM for goodness sake. how do you take seriously ANYONE who talks about the illuminati? -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Bob Calco Sent: Friday, 31 July 2009 12:45 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIMDV3Sv0l8feature=related -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Geoff Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:00 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? what a mindless drivel! a house of cards has better construction. this is nothing more than reverse engineered paranoia. take a person you hate, find some ancient words that MIGHT sound similar and then find someone to pin it on. the worst thing is that if obama was a republican you would be praising him and saying exactly the same things i am saying. your christianity is subservient to your politics. that is a disgrace. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Wednesday, 29 July 2009 2:16 PM To: Mike Madigan Subject: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXMAnlMmEPw * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/61814[excessive quoting removed by server] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a734e95.7040...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Health Care via RE: [NF] Apps for the iPhone, watch out
Kind of like being asked as a young, intelligent person to go to Iraq and die for an oil supply.. uh ... err... good of the country hmmm... yea you're right, pretty stupid and unethical. Michael Madigan wrote: I can't wait for the End of Life Counseling when a Government worker comes to grandma's house and asks her to die for the good of the country. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com wrote: From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Health Care via RE: [NF] Apps for the iPhone, watch out To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:23 AM People are not interested in understanding what is in the health care bill never mind even attempting to read it. All they want is free health care. ::michael Bob Calco wrote: I note parenthetically that the Democrats are in the same self-induced pickle with the monstrous health care bill they're on the verge of passing. I wish people would read what's actually in it. That's the only antidote, the Republican party being pretty much irrelevant at the moment. - Bob [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a734efb.7070...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Health Care via RE: [NF] Apps for the iPhone, watch out
..Bob said.. Congress is not allowed to audit the Fed... hmmm, last I knew, Congress IS the Fed :-) Try again Bobby Seniors, are you paying attention?! But he gives such nice speeches and makes such emphatic promises! - Bob -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 2:51 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Health Care via RE: [NF] Apps for the iPhone, watch out I can't wait for the End of Life Counseling when a Government worker comes to grandma's house and asks her to die for the good of the country. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com wrote: From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Health Care via RE: [NF] Apps for the iPhone, watch out To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:23 AM People are not interested in understanding what is in the health care bill never mind even attempting to read it. All they want is free health care. ::michael Bob Calco wrote: I note parenthetically that the Democrats are in the same self-induced pickle with the monstrous health care bill they're on the verge of passing. I wish people would read what's actually in it. That's the only antidote, the Republican party being pretty much irrelevant at the moment. - Bob [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a734f48.5050...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ?
Ha, Michael, There are those that can see the discrepancies in the old book that directly contradict or are not really applicable now... so if you want to take it all very literally then each of us would have lost an eye, a hand etc. or been stoned for our due punishment. the whole talk of the Anti-Christ etc. is debatable as to whether or not Revelation represents reflections on time that passed or future predictions... it's not BW, and no it's not You're with us or against us... :) I believe in a God of love. Not politicized interpretations of the old book to suit certain modern day bigoted party lines. Ever since we've been kids (and before), humans have been trying to assign the label Anti-Christ to people they disagree with the BS continues today... you either drink the AntiChrist game koolaid or you evolve past that nonsense BS. Michael Madigan wrote: Phil, You're either a believer or you're not. Geoff professes to be a believer, therefore The Book of Revelation is as important a part of the New Testament as any book. The video showed an interesting tidbit on why Obama may be the Antichrist. I've listed many other possible connections too. The Bible was written 2000 years ago. If you don't believe it, don't believe it. Why do non-believers interject themselves in Bible discussions? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 4:05 PM Michael, :) (shoe-fly pie man) It's more like, why did humans decide to write this text into a book over 2000 years ago... claiming God told them to... :) Way before the US existed... and way before elections existed with only 2 parties... way before... umm... point made. :) -Philip Michael Madigan wrote: No, I doubt the faith of someone who dismisses it out of hand. There's a reason God gave Saint John a vision, it was to warn the believers. IF you're not even going to discuss it, then why did God bother? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 5:02 AM is that a serious comment? you doubt the faith of anyone who disbelieves obama is the antichrist??? perhaps re-reading the Bible might be of some help to you. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 31 July 2009 3:03 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? I don't take seriously a man who professes to be Christian who dismisses out of hand that Obama is the AntiChrist. Someone has to be the AntiChrist and Obama is starting to fit the mold. --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 11:22 PM for goodness sake. how do you take seriously ANYONE who talks about the illuminati? -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Bob Calco Sent: Friday, 31 July 2009 12:45 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIMDV3Sv0l8feature=related -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Geoff Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:00 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? what a mindless drivel! a house of cards has better construction. this is nothing more than reverse engineered paranoia. take a person you hate, find some ancient words that MIGHT sound similar and then find someone
Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ?
:-) I'm not losing sleep over this Michael :) Michael Madigan wrote: Sure Phil There are Christians who support abortions too. what does it matter? You don't believe in the word of God. I bet you don't believe in Satan either. Satan is just some mythical boogey man, right Phil? Is Jesus the Son of God or is that a myth too? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 4:17 PM Ha, Michael, There are those that can see the discrepancies in the old book that directly contradict or are not really applicable now... so if you want to take it all very literally then each of us would have lost an eye, a hand etc. or been stoned for our due punishment. the whole talk of the Anti-Christ etc. is debatable as to whether or not Revelation represents reflections on time that passed or future predictions... it's not BW, and no it's not You're with us or against us... :) I believe in a God of love. Not politicized interpretations of the old book to suit certain modern day bigoted party lines. Ever since we've been kids (and before), humans have been trying to assign the label Anti-Christ to people they disagree with the BS continues today... you either drink the AntiChrist game koolaid or you evolve past that nonsense BS. Michael Madigan wrote: Phil, You're either a believer or you're not. Geoff professes to be a believer, therefore The Book of Revelation is as important a part of the New Testament as any book. The video showed an interesting tidbit on why Obama may be the Antichrist. I've listed many other possible connections too. The Bible was written 2000 years ago. If you don't believe it, don't believe it. Why do non-believers interject themselves in Bible discussions? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 4:05 PM Michael, :) (shoe-fly pie man) It's more like, why did humans decide to write this text into a book over 2000 years ago... claiming God told them to... :) Way before the US existed... and way before elections existed with only 2 parties... way before... umm... point made. :) -Philip Michael Madigan wrote: No, I doubt the faith of someone who dismisses it out of hand. There's a reason God gave Saint John a vision, it was to warn the believers. IF you're not even going to discuss it, then why did God bother? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 5:02 AM is that a serious comment? you doubt the faith of anyone who disbelieves obama is the antichrist??? perhaps re-reading the Bible might be of some help to you. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 31 July 2009 3:03 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? I don't take seriously a man who professes to be Christian who dismisses out of hand that Obama is the AntiChrist. Someone has to be the AntiChrist and Obama is starting to fit the mold. --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ
Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ?
Is that because you're biased and like Shoe-fly pie too? :-) Michael Madigan wrote: The post wasn't intended for people like you. --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 4:27 PM :-) I'm not losing sleep over this Michael :) Michael Madigan wrote: Sure Phil There are Christians who support abortions too. what does it matter? You don't believe in the word of God. I bet you don't believe in Satan either. Satan is just some mythical boogey man, right Phil? Is Jesus the Son of God or is that a myth too? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 4:17 PM Ha, Michael, There are those that can see the discrepancies in the old book that directly contradict or are not really applicable now... so if you want to take it all very literally then each of us would have lost an eye, a hand etc. or been stoned for our due punishment. the whole talk of the Anti-Christ etc. is debatable as to whether or not Revelation represents reflections on time that passed or future predictions... it's not BW, and no it's not You're with us or against us... :) I believe in a God of love. Not politicized interpretations of the old book to suit certain modern day bigoted party lines. Ever since we've been kids (and before), humans have been trying to assign the label Anti-Christ to people they disagree with the BS continues today... you either drink the AntiChrist game koolaid or you evolve past that nonsense BS. Michael Madigan wrote: Phil, You're either a believer or you're not. Geoff professes to be a believer, therefore The Book of Revelation is as important a part of the New Testament as any book. The video showed an interesting tidbit on why Obama may be the Antichrist. I've listed many other possible connections too. The Bible was written 2000 years ago. If you don't believe it, don't believe it. Why do non-believers interject themselves in Bible discussions? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 4:05 PM Michael, :) (shoe-fly pie man) It's more like, why did humans decide to write this text into a book over 2000 years ago... claiming God told them to... :) Way before the US existed... and way before elections existed with only 2 parties... way before... umm... point made. :) -Philip Michael Madigan wrote: No, I doubt the faith of someone who dismisses it out of hand. There's a reason God gave Saint John a vision, it was to warn the believers. IF you're not even going to discuss it, then why did God bother? * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote
Re: [OT] Did Jesus give us the name of the Anti-Christ?
And then fainted when they had to hold their arm up too high for too long... ;-) Pete Theisen wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: It doesn't necessarily mean he's the AntiChrist. Did people faint at the sight of Hitler? Hi Michael, I think just mostly gave the stiff-armed Heil Hitler salute. That doesn't mean he is Satan, that means he is Elvis. It is most unlikely that Jesus would use any future meanings to his ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a735f15.9000...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] She Said, He Said
Uh Michael, now you are uninformed, Americans sure do go to Canada and Mexico for health care. It's been happening for years. Michael Madigan wrote: There's a reason why everyone comes here for health care. You don't see Americans pouring over the border into Canada or Mexico. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Wed, 8/5/09, Geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] She Said, He Said To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 3:26 AM if this plan was a republican one you'd support it enthusiastically. but because its a Dem plan you dont. and the fact your health system is embarrassingly bad by western standards just doesnt enter into it... -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Wednesday, 5 August 2009 4:51 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] She Said, He Said Well that's why the Republican plan wants to change the law to forbid insurance companies from dropping or preventing you from participating due to existing conditions. The Republican plan also wants to prevent frivolous lawsuits, the kind that made John Edwards wealthy. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Wed, 8/5/09, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: From: Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net Subject: Re: [OT] She Said, He Said To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 2:45 AM Michael Madigan wrote: Actually the system works fine for me and I am far from rich. Hi Michael, But are you *sick*? That would be the test. You'd be very surprised at how fast your plan would unceremoniously get rid of you if you ever were. Not only that. You don't have to be sick for very long before you are positively *destitute* as in poor, not merely far from rich. All those co-pays that are pocket change to someone who is far from rich become deal breakers for the poor. Actually, they both lied. A larger issue, though, is that no one is telling the whole truth. In many cases they plain don't know the truth but think they know *everything*. It is clear that the present system only works for the rich. What isn't clear is that the proposed system might not work for anybody. She said: http://bit.ly/1jLlw He said: http://bit.ly/153E2o http://bit.ly/18kuGA http://bit.ly/sfxRY They are both pathological liars. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a79b1ba.7030...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Rampant violations of no-call law
h... it's private companies that are choosing to call our numbers duh Pete Theisen wrote: Hi Everybody, What has happened to the no-call law since Obama took over. I have been on the no-call list for years. Now that Obama is president it is like there is no no-call law. What's up with that? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a7c43c8.3030...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Things that make you go Hmmm
Michael and Bob, I suggest you two critiques/complainers/name-callers, simply write your own policy proposals here for once. You two are very quick to criticize, demonize and state that anyone that disagrees with you hates America. It's easier to criticize than it is to stand on your own two feet and propose viable alternatives. So let's hear some detailed viable alternatives here instead of always being so negative and portraying yourselves as the only two individuals in the universe that somehow love America. Go ahead, try it for once. -Philip Michael Madigan wrote: He wants to remove any resemblance to America, not change things. --- On Sun, 8/9/09, Geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] Things that make you go Hmmm To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 6:36 PM A curious brand of cognitive dissonance. - Bob an interesting notion for someone who claims Obama hates America because he wants to CHANGE things. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Bob Calco Sent: Monday, 10 August 2009 4:11 AM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Things that make you go Hmmm Pete: Hi Michael, Clinton DID every chick he could. All Clinton cared about was his own s*x life. The video posted does not support the theory that Obama had Union Thugs start or participate in a fight. It looked like it was just an altercation between two individuals that spread to other guys, some of whom wore union shirts. Fights are like that. Clinton was indifferent to America. That is worse, far worse, than hating America. Obama is not indifferent, and he does not hate America but rather he hates inequality. I hate inequality. That is, you relate to him through envy, which explains your latent socialism. You are dead wrong about his attitude toward America, it was evident in everything he said, did and didn't say or didn't do during the campaign. America needs to be completely changed because it was wholly unacceptable to The One. Even his wife proclaimed, not once but twice, that she was never proud of her country in all of her adult life until it was obvious her husband was whooping Clinton's entitled arse in the primaries. All Obama loves is himself; he's a grade A narcissist, with sociopathic tendencies that will grow more evident as his One-ness is challenged. America is not supposed to be unequal, it has just evolved in that direction. The people who benefit from inequality are not what anyone would call deep thinkers - just the opposite. They typically think that whatever benefits them, no matter what detriment to others or the whole society, is right for America or indeed the world. America is founded on equality under the law, based on endowment by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, not equality of outcomes as measured by faceless government bureaucrats. You seem to relate to Obama's clear passion for the latter and hatred of America for those times it did not live up to its ideals. So you're secretly pulling for him to be successful leveling the field even as you prepare to vote against him next go-round. A curious brand of cognitive dissonance. - Bob Jean could have done a better job than Obama because Jean hates America less than Obama. Who was the last real patriot who held office? Reagan? The usual thing is for them to line their own pockets, and the pockets of their buddies. That's all Obama is really about. In effect that is hating America, but not any more than, say, Lyndon Johnson. I was completely wrong about that Obama guy: Told you so... -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a8045d2.6080...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us
...yawn... Bob Calco wrote: He can't even trust doctors to perform a tonsillectomy for the right reasons, you think Obama would trust them with unclear standards for determining live birth? I'm sure the new Planned Parenthood standards championed by Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel as a means to reduce health care costs will leave nothing to chance. That won't happen here. Rahm's brother makes Dr. Kevorkian look like a veritable pro-lifer by comparison. - Bob -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:14 AM To: mikes horse racing Subject: [OT] This is what obama care will give us http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1205165/Father-opens-coffin- dead-baby-alive.html [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a844034.6080...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Smoke and Mirrors Kenyan killing economy more
yawn Michael Madigan wrote: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Fed-says-economy-leveling-new-apf-1948834182.html?x=0.v=7 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a8572d1.1000...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us
I don't find eugenics and euthanasia in the bills being proposed. It's only in the bogus opposition smoke screens that are being spewed out by the likes of you and others who are simply trying to make the whole process of health reform fail. Michael Madigan wrote: You don't find eugenics and euthanasia disturbing? --- On Thu, 8/13/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009, 12:32 PM ...yawn... Bob Calco wrote: He can't even trust doctors to perform a tonsillectomy for the right reasons, you think Obama would trust them with unclear standards for determining live birth? I'm sure the new Planned Parenthood standards championed by Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel as a means to reduce health care costs will leave nothing to chance. That won't happen here. Rahm's brother makes Dr. Kevorkian look like a veritable pro-lifer by comparison. - Bob -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:14 AM To: mikes horse racing Subject: [OT] This is what obama care will give us http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1205165/Father-opens-coffin- dead-baby-alive.html [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85735c.5080...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us
Michael (and all the other Chicken Littles out there) Advanced Directives are commonly discussed with almost anyone going into the hospital where the procedure might be serious. They are good to have on file and they are now done in private run programs. (My ex wife is a chaplain in a hospital and does this all the time) One of the current bills states that the govt. provided health care will cover the costs of having these discussions and writing up one's own personal advanced directive if they choose to. PERIOD Stop all the BS smoke screen lies that are trying to stop ANY KIND of health reform. Michael Madigan wrote: The Bill establishes panels. In the White House now is Ezekial Emanuel, who has written extensively on withholding care from the very young and the very old. --- On Fri, 8/14/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 10:23 AM I don't find eugenics and euthanasia in the bills being proposed. It's only in the bogus opposition smoke screens that are being spewed out by the likes of you and others who are simply trying to make the whole process of health reform fail. Michael Madigan wrote: You don't find eugenics and euthanasia disturbing? --- On Thu, 8/13/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009, 12:32 PM ...yawn... Bob Calco wrote: He can't even trust doctors to perform a tonsillectomy for the right reasons, you think Obama would trust them with unclear standards for determining live birth? I'm sure the new Planned Parenthood standards championed by Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel as a means to reduce health care costs will leave nothing to chance. That won't happen here. Rahm's brother makes Dr. Kevorkian look like a veritable pro-lifer by comparison. - Bob -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:14 AM To: mikes horse racing Subject: [OT] This is what obama care will give us http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1205165/Father-opens-coffin- dead-baby-alive.html [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85ac21@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
using FindWindowEx and close another Win 32 app
Hi All, I'm using the win 32 api FindWindowEx to get the handle of an open application (MS.ACCESS) once I get that handle, is there another win 32 api to then close it via VFP? Thanks, -Philip ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85ad3e.5020...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us
Pete, There you go again. Do you know what an Advanced Directive is? It has nothing to do with Euthenasia and has ONLY to do with an opportunity to put down in words what you want done for yourself if you get to a point where you are incapacitated. Geez. You should know better than that with your experience in the medical field. It is where you can decide, YOU, and NO ONE ELSE, that if the worse comes to worse, just how far you want them to go to keep you alive... once you are at a point where you are not able to make those decisions for yourself. This has nothing to do with socialism, illegals, Obama, health reform or anything except WHAT ARE YOUR PERSONAL WISHES for treatment. Once you are incapacitated, it is difficult to speak with the practitioner and discuss what to do... The health providers I know, wish everyone would have these on file to make decision making easier so NO ONE ELSE has to decide for you. This is for ALL AGES, not just elderly. We all should have one on file to assist our relatives, friends and care practitioners when the worse comes to worse. Give me a break. -Philip Pete Theisen wrote: Philip Borkholder wrote: Michael (and all the other Chicken Littles out there) Advanced Directives are commonly discussed Hi Philip, Oh! Well, why didn't someone say so! If it isn't called euthanasia but rather a buzzword or catchphrase such as Advanced Directives then it is just - killing the old or sick people. Silly us to dare object! Abortion and euthanasia are the same issue. The mutt is a huge fan of abortion so he is a huge fan of euthanasia! Of course his bill has euthanasia! It is of keen interest to me because I am of the age and condition where progressives would consider me a useless eater. A couple of years ago I was flat refused health care for a couple of years because I couldn't qualify. At the same time illegals were being routinely seen at the same clinic with no qualifications whatsoever - unless speaking *no* English is a qualification, but they were younger and could be put back to work with a shot and a bottle of pills. When confronted with the fact that the illegals had no qualification I demanded the same privilege, got nothing. I am diabetic and they knew it, didn't make any difference, actually they preferred that I have something like that, since they were trying to kill me. They still are, but are not quite as daring about it now that I have written to every politician I can think of and the newspaper. There were something like five pages of euthanasia in the link Bob posted. You are right that it is nothing new, though. Just that to those affected it is getting old. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85b644.40...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: using FindWindowEx and close another Win 32 app
Thanks Richard, I was using this GETOBJECT() command, but the problem is, I had two instances of Access.Application running with two different DBs. :) Then the GETOBJECT() only caught the first one, which I want to leave open. Thanks though Richard Kaye wrote: Not sure about the API but you might be able to use automation to accomplish something like this. untested code alert m.loAccess=GETOBJECT(,[access.application]) IF VARTYPE(m.loAccess)=[O] m.loAccess.Quit ENDIF m.loAccess=NULL /untested code alert Of course, this does not take into account open files in a changed state that need to be saved or reverted, etc. rk -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 2:30 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: using FindWindowEx and close another Win 32 app Hi All, I'm using the win 32 api FindWindowEx to get the handle of an open application (MS.ACCESS) once I get that handle, is there another win 32 api to then close it via VFP? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85b6a4.6070...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: using FindWindowEx and close another Win 32 app
Thanks Christof! This is what I was looking for! Christof Wollenhaupt wrote: Function KillTask Parameter tcWindowName Declare Integer FindWindow in Win32Api Integer, String Declare Integer PostMessage in Win32Api Integer, Integer, Integer, Integer #Define WM_CLOSE 16 Local lnHwnd lnHwnd = FindWindow(0, tcWindowName) If lnHwnd = 0 Return Endif PostMessage( m.lnHwnd, WM_CLOSE, 0, 0 ) Return [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85b6ba.9050...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us
They removed the component that talked about discussing end of life because of all the chicken littles out there screaming BS lies about it and exaggerating the claims of euthanasia when it reality it was simply discussing Advanced Directives. give me a break. It made a lot of sense. But now they have to remove things politically because of all the violent, unfounded knee-jerk reactions Karl Rove's cheerleaders are having out there in the town hall meetings... and here on OT. Michael Madigan wrote: NO! THIS WAS MANDATORY IN THE HOUSE BILL. Every 5 years after a certain age, elderly had to meet with an end-of-life counselor. The Senate has now removed all the death panel language from the Senate Bill. Well if it didn't exist, how did they remove it? --- On Fri, 8/14/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 2:25 PM Michael (and all the other Chicken Littles out there) Advanced Directives are commonly discussed with almost anyone going into the hospital where the procedure might be serious. They are good to have on file and they are now done in private run programs. (My ex wife is a chaplain in a hospital and does this all the time) One of the current bills states that the govt. provided health care will cover the costs of having these discussions and writing up one's own personal advanced directive if they choose to. PERIOD Stop all the BS smoke screen lies that are trying to stop ANY KIND of health reform. Michael Madigan wrote: The Bill establishes panels. In the White House now is Ezekial Emanuel, who has written extensively on withholding care from the very young and the very old. --- On Fri, 8/14/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 10:23 AM I don't find eugenics and euthanasia in the bills being proposed. It's only in the bogus opposition smoke screens that are being spewed out by the likes of you and others who are simply trying to make the whole process of health reform fail. Michael Madigan wrote: You don't find eugenics and euthanasia disturbing? --- On Thu, 8/13/09, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: From: Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net Subject: Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009, 12:32 PM ...yawn... Bob Calco wrote: He can't even trust doctors to perform a tonsillectomy for the right reasons, you think Obama would trust them with unclear standards for determining live birth? I'm sure the new Planned Parenthood standards championed by Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel as a means to reduce health care costs will leave nothing to chance. That won't happen here. Rahm's brother makes Dr. Kevorkian look like a veritable pro-lifer by comparison. - Bob -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:14 AM To: mikes horse racing Subject: [OT] This is what obama care will give us http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1205165/Father-opens-coffin- dead-baby-alive.html [excessive quoting removed by server
Re: using FindWindowEx and close another Win 32 app
Hi Richard, You're right on. Your sample is what I was using till I got caught with two instances. :) And I did try putting the file name in the first property but I could not get that to work successfully. Thanks Richard Kaye wrote: It's hard to compete with Christof... g You didn't mention you had multiple running instances of Access. If you pass just the document name as the first param of GETOBJECT, you should be able to distinguish between instances. rk -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 3:10 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: using FindWindowEx and close another Win 32 app Thanks Richard, I was using this GETOBJECT() command, but the problem is, I had two instances of Access.Application running with two different DBs. :) Then the GETOBJECT() only caught the first one, which I want to leave open. Thanks though [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85ccd4.6080...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us
Pete The Advanced Directive is where YOU and YOU alone decide what you want done to you. Geez. What part of that don't you understand? Also, when you start using the term NAZI in your diatribes, you have lost the argument. You have swallowed hook, line and sinker what Karl Rove and his band of propaganda buddies have put out there to protect the status quo: Corporate power, Corporate profit over US Citizen rights to health coverage. Congratulations, they love you and the other fear mongers. -Philip Pete Theisen wrote: Pete Theisen wrote: That came out mangled for some reason, try this: Philip Borkholder wrote: They removed the component that talked about discussing end of life because of all the chicken littles out there screaming BS lies about it and exaggerating the claims of euthanasia when it reality it was simply discussing Advanced Directives. give me a break. It made a lot of sense. But now they have to remove things politically because of all the violent, unfounded knee-jerk reactions Karl Rove's cheerleaders are having out there in the town hall meetings... and here on OT. Michael Madigan wrote: NO! THIS WAS MANDATORY IN THE HOUSE BILL. Every 5 years after a certain age, elderly had to meet with an end-of-life counselor. The Senate has now removed all the death panel language from the Senate Bill. Hi Philip, If you wish to choose your time of death as it is euphemistically expressed, that is between you and God. *YOU* and God, you dare not make that kind of choice for me. I would call the proposal mass murder. To try it on one person would be assault with intent to murder. To suggest it as law is conspiracy to commit mass murder. Nothing like this has any place in US law. The self-starting Nazis in government are trying hard enough to kill us as it is without it being spelled out chapter and verse for them. The right to Life language in the Declaration of Independence will be there forever, it is not subject to revision. No matter how many liberal democrats are elected. What has this to do with Karl Rove? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85d17f.4060...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us
attempted killing please Pete. Take your conspiracy theories to the courts, not the health coverage debate. Pete Theisen wrote: Philip Borkholder wrote: The Advanced Directive is where YOU and YOU alone decide what you want done to you. Hi Philip, That's what it used to mean. Now it means they kill you. Not directly, but with the wrong meds or too many meds or not any meds, or procedures that go wrong. Routinely, over 98,000 per year. They claim it is accidental, but how can accidents like that keep happening year after year after year? Especially when the patient knows what is happening and is trying to stop it? As I was? What part of that don't you understand? I had this attempted killing happen to me. I posted about it today and back when it was happening. What part don't *you* understand? Also, when you start using the term NAZI in your diatribes, you have lost the argument. Who says, you? If I fail to impress you, that is merely failing to open a closed mind, that is all. Do you know where the word Nazi came from? National Socialism, from 30s Germany. That's what they want here now, National Socialism. But we have to be careful about how they balance the budget. In Nazi Germany they killed Jews either by design or neglect, defining them as useless eaters. In Nazi America they will either have to kill *a lot* of useless people or raise taxes. You know how they hesitate to raise taxes, at least until their lame duck period. So, they identify the weak and try to kill them. They have learned that I am not as weak as they thought so they have postponed killing me, but I am still on the death list. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85ddf8.1030...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Death Panels do exist
Ok Mr. Pete, Where's the proof of your absurd accusation? Pete Theisen wrote: Ed Leafe wrote: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/18/free-market_death_panels_97922.html ( -or- http://bit.ly/11qhlD ) Hi Ed, Yes, it is true. What the lady doesn't know is that the government program is going to be modeled on the same playbook. The bureaucrats are already working on incentives in various agencies, notably the IRS. So the national health care person would herd you into the slaughterhouse just as surely as the insurance companies are now doing. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a8bf4c2.3030...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Death Panels do exist
Uh Peter, I did read the article about the private insurance companies, and I do know that is happening and is true. I was referring to your absurd, unfounded statement below: Pete Theisen wrote: So the national health care person would herd you into the slaughterhouse just as surely as the insurance companies are now doing. Philip Borkholder wrote: Ok Mr. Pete, Where's the proof of your absurd accusation? Hi Philip, You are the one who didn't read the last link, I guess you didn't read this one either. Nothing I could show you would open your closed mind, you will just have to wait until it happens to you. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a8d5c2d.4090...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Rushmore and JOINs
Hello all, I know that Rushmore tech comes into play when you JOIN tables using fields that have index tags in their respective tables. However, does the tag have to match the name of the actual field being indexed? Reason I ask, in an app I support, performance was slow when joining two tables together on one key field. Let's say the field is: FGITEM The index tag is just ITEM The Join statement had: SELECT tableA.*, tableB.descrip FROM tableA INNER JOIN tableB on tableA.FGITEM = tableB.ITEM Once I added a new index TAG to tableA FGITEM tag FGITEM The query ran much faster. Does this make sense or am I misunderstanding it? Thank you, Philip Borkholder Vicksburg, MI Old School Yearbook Pics View Class Yearbooks Online Free. Search by School Year. Look Now! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/558d7928daeb179283574st04duc ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/558d7918.70...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Rushmore and JOINs
Thank you for the responses: What I find strange though, and the reason I posted, is that the JOIN field DID have an index TAG in the CDX with a TAG name that differed from the field, and the Query was slow. Once I added an additional Index tag, on the same field, with a TAG name that equaled the field, the query ran faster... very strange. -Philip On 6/26/2015 12:33 PM, Fred Taylor wrote: Yes, that's exactly correct. For Rushmore to kick in, the left side of your condition must match a tag's fields. The tag name is irrelevant. So in your example, TABLEA must have an index on FGITEM. The tag name does not matter. Fred On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Philip Borkholder plbor...@netzero.net wrote: Hello all, I know that Rushmore tech comes into play when you JOIN tables using fields that have index tags in their respective tables. However, does the tag have to match the name of the actual field being indexed? Reason I ask, in an app I support, performance was slow when joining two tables together on one key field. Let's say the field is: FGITEM The index tag is just ITEM The Join statement had: SELECT tableA.*, tableB.descrip FROM tableA INNER JOIN tableB on tableA.FGITEM = tableB.ITEM Once I added a new index TAG to tableA FGITEM tag FGITEM The query ran much faster. Does this make sense or am I misunderstanding it? Thank you, Philip Borkholder Vicksburg, MI Old School Yearbook Pics View Class Yearbooks Online Free. Search by School Year. Look Now! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/558d7928daeb179283574st04duc [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/558d82c8.8040...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Microsoft Date Time Picker properties
Hi Joe, That would be under Tools Object Browser Open Hit the tab Com Libraries Scroll down till you find Microsoft Date and Time Picker Control n.0 (SPn) Check the check box and it will display the methods and properties in the Classes Members section of the Object Browser. -Philip B. On 7/16/2015 7:57 PM, Joe Yoder wrote: I have discovered by looking at others code that one can access properties of the control via: - thisform.ControlName.object.value - thisform.ControlName.object.MinDate - thisform.ControlName.object.MaxDate I am sure there are more properties but since they don't show in the VFP Properties window I don't know what they are or where to go to find them. I have not figured out how to use a datetime field in a table as the control source for such a control either. The properties window allows me to set a control source but the field and display values don't stay matched. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks in advance, Joe --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/55a91aea.70...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Microsoft Date Time Picker properties
Joe, Doug Henning has a good posting on the use of it here: http://doughennig.blogspot.com/2008/06/using-microsoft-date-and-time-picker.html And here's a good article on using it in a grid http://weblogs.foxite.com/sandstorm36/2009/08/25/datetime-picker-in-a-grid-how-toupdated/ -Philip On 7/16/2015 7:57 PM, Joe Yoder wrote: I have discovered by looking at others code that one can access properties of the control via: - thisform.ControlName.object.value - thisform.ControlName.object.MinDate - thisform.ControlName.object.MaxDate I am sure there are more properties but since they don't show in the VFP Properties window I don't know what they are or where to go to find them. I have not figured out how to use a datetime field in a table as the control source for such a control either. The properties window allows me to set a control source but the field and display values don't stay matched. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks in advance, Joe --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/55a91b70.6010...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Visual Foxpro and Windows 10 problems
Hello all, Has anyone experienced any of these problems with Visual Foxpro and Windows 10? 1) Windows Updates renaming the VFP9.EXE ? 2) DBFs and EXE files being removed by Antivirus SOftware and/or Anti-Malware protection programs? One of my colleagues has said they are experiencing this. She did not say what version of VFP nor what AV software. Thank you Philip Borkholder The 7 Most Amazing Credit Cards If You Have Excellent ... http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/565ca0bddc28220bd3e8ast01duc ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/565ca0af.3070...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Visual Foxpro and Windows 10 problems
Bingo, that was it. After further inquiry (/they initially blamed Win 10/). They discovered it only happened on the stations they had "Anti-Exploit" anti-malware Software installed. :-/ Case closed. Thank you Sytze. On 11/30/2015 2:52 PM, Sytze de Boer wrote: I don't think these are symptoms of a Windows 10 problem. Yes, I have a client who suffered from this with Norton On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Philip Borkholder <plbor...@netzero.net> wrote: Hello all, Has anyone experienced any of these problems with Visual Foxpro and Windows 10? 1) Windows Updates renaming the VFP9.EXE ? 2) DBFs and EXE files being removed by Antivirus SOftware and/or Anti-Malware protection programs? One of my colleagues has said they are experiencing this. She did not say what version of VFP nor what AV software. Thank you Philip Borkholder The 7 Most Amazing Credit Cards If You Have Excellent ... http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/565ca0bddc28220bd3e8ast01duc [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/565cd81c.4050...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Win10 Free Upgrade Expiration???
Here is a product I downloaded and installed on my Windows 7 to remove the Windows 10 upgrade warning and block it completely from installing itself. It's called GWX Control Panel http://ultimateoutsider.com/downloads/ Philip Borkholder On 5/23/2016 2:00 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote: Andy - that IS Abysmal news indeed! To say M$ has become Arrogant is almost putting it lightly. Oh well, at this point - nothing to do but move forwards... On my Win8.1 laptop it keeps nagging about the Win10 update - and, up till now - I continue to just ignore the Nag - although, in the end - that IS the machine I will eventually update! Regards, Kurt Wendt Senior Systems Analyst Tel. +1-212-747-9100 www.GlobeTax.com -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of AndyHC Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 5:45 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Win10 Free Upgrade Expiration??? Well, expiration has become a moot point - yesterday I found my Win7 HP laptop displaying a screen saying "Installing Windows 10 Update - Do not switch off your PC". I had NOT clicked accept. This morning (!) the installation was complete. I could have declined to accept the ms licence, but in view of their amazingly arrogant behaviour I wasn't sure I wouldn't lose everything. I declined all the snooping and new default app options and now have to find out what does and doesn't work on my Win10 laptop. Words fail me - which is quite unusual! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/57474a72.2060...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC
Hey folks, Has anyone else experienced this error: "This app can't run on your PC" Our VFP9 App ran fine on Servers 2003, 2008 for Terminal Server with the drive mapped as F:\AppFolder\App.EXE Now when they upgraded to Server 2012, we get this error when running on a mapped drive, but if we use the full local drive path of the server: E:\Data\Appfolder\App.exe It runs fine. Does anyone know what part of Server 2012 is causing this block? Thanks, Philip Borkholder Affordable Wireless Plans Set up is easy. Get online in minutes. Starting at only $9.95 per month! www.netzero.net?refcd=nzmem0216 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/574748ec.8060...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC
It is the exact same one. What does not work is to run it from a mapped, shared folder. It only works running it with the direct local path. In this case, the TS is the same server as the File Server luckily. Philip On 5/26/2016 5:18 PM, Alan Bourke wrote: Is the non working EXE exactly the same size as the working one? Affordable Wireless Plans Set up is easy. Get online in minutes. Starting at only $9.95 per month! www.netzero.net?refcd=nzmem0216 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/57476f19.90...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC
Thanks Richard, I'll google it to see what to do. -Philip On 5/26/2016 5:51 PM, Richard Kaye wrote: It's the equivalent of an SSL certificate for desktop applications. Google code signing certificate to learn more. -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:47 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC Hi Tracy, That is something new to me. What is that and how do I do it? :-) Thanks Philip On 5/26/2016 3:31 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26: Hey folks, Has anyone else experienced this error: "This app can't run on your PC" Our VFP9 App ran fine on Servers 2003, 2008 for Terminal Server with the drive mapped as F:\AppFolder\App.EXE Now when they upgraded to Server 2012, we get this error when running on a mapped drive, but if we use the full local drive path of the server: E:\Data\Appfolder\App.exe It runs fine. Does anyone know what part of Server 2012 is causing this block? Thanks, Philip Borkholder Philip, Is your EXE digitally signed with a 256 bit key? Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/574770b8.2030...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC
Thanks Tracy, -Philip On 5/26/2016 6:30 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26: Thanks Richard, I'll google it to see what to do. -Philip On 5/26/2016 5:51 PM, Richard Kaye wrote: It's the equivalent of an SSL certificate for desktop applications. Google code signing certificate to learn more. -- rk Philip, If you do consider signing the EXE, be sure to shop around for the best price. This company was the best price that I found when I was searching. http://codesigning.ksoftware.net/ Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/57477c05.1080...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC
Hi Tracy, That is something new to me. What is that and how do I do it? :-) Thanks Philip On 5/26/2016 3:31 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26: Hey folks, Has anyone else experienced this error: "This app can't run on your PC" Our VFP9 App ran fine on Servers 2003, 2008 for Terminal Server with the drive mapped as F:\AppFolder\App.EXE Now when they upgraded to Server 2012, we get this error when running on a mapped drive, but if we use the full local drive path of the server: E:\Data\Appfolder\App.exe It runs fine. Does anyone know what part of Server 2012 is causing this block? Thanks, Philip Borkholder Philip, Is your EXE digitally signed with a 256 bit key? Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/57476ec5.2080...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Outlook 2016 security no longer allowing VFP app to send emails as it did in the past
Hi Mike, Is the application you're referring to Sage PRO ERP (Accpac Pro Series, SBT Pro Series?) If so, we ran into this same problem here with some installations of Outlook 2016. i simply changed the automatically send SMTP commands to prompt for the mail and it worked. .olemessage.Send(.T.) It's a little bit slower than being able to automatically send the email but it was a solution. Let me know if it is and I can help. Philip B. Vicksburg, MI On 7/25/2017 1:12 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: My client has Outlook 2016. At some point in the past, the Outlook version they had prior worked with the application that uses SMTP to send emails from it. I thought I recalled Microsoft tightening security over the years but that there was some (3rd party?) utility to get around the increased security blockage. Does anyone remember that and can comment on it? Thanks. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/100e85a4-921c-ce07-5167-9cdc06126...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: GETFILE() Returns Empty String in Some Cases
Are you declaring your variable as PRIVATE right before you run the
GETFILE() command?
PRIVATE mypath
mypath = GETFILE("csv","Spreadsheet","Open",0,"Open Spreadsheet")
Just curious if that is affecting it.
-Philip
On 7/31/2017 2:19 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
Permissions issue on the folder or on the selected file?
I don't see how. In both cases it's me doing the test, on the same
computer, with the same folder and file, with the same domain
administrator account.
Ken Dibble
www.stic-cil.org
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/588017c0-9341-521a-b853-270a04a58...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: GETFILE() Returns Empty String in Some Cases
You are welcome Ken,
I had the same thing happen to me awhile back that had me stumped!
... sometimes it's the last thing we would consider being the problem. :-)
On 7/31/2017 4:04 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
Are you declaring your variable as PRIVATE right before you run the
GETFILE() command?
PRIVATE mypath
mypath = GETFILE("csv","Spreadsheet","Open",0,"Open Spreadsheet")
Just curious if that is affecting it.
GAHHH!!! That's it!!
Not a PRIVATE declaration, the variable is declared LOCAL.
But in application mode there is a field in an open table with the
same name as the variable. I applied the "essential m-dot" to the
variable, and that fixed it.
Thanks very much Philip!!
Ken Dibble
www.stic-cil.org
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5d7ce745-1a70-880b-f621-fb14da530...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Outlook 2016 security no longer allowing VFP app to send emails as it did in the past
Hi Mike I've seen that error before in my MAPI emailing programs on new workstations. When Office is installed via a non-DVD method, then the WIN.INI file does not always get updated for MAPI. Try adding this to that Windows 10 file: C:\Windows\win.ini [Mail] CMCDLLNAME32=mapi32.dll CMC=1 MAPI=1 MAPIX=1 MAPIXVER=1.0.0.1 OLEMessaging=1 On 8/1/2017 2:45 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: On 2017-07-26 11:06, Alan Bourke wrote: It offered SMTP, MAPI, and Extended MAPI. If you can make it use Extended MAPI then you shouldn't have an issue sending with Outlook. computer specs: Windows 10 Professional, 64-bit I tried using Simple OR Extended MAPI but I get this error: https://www.screencast.com/t/OR1m3sOj4I I also get that error OUTSIDE of the application trying to email. I created a test.txt file on the desktop, right-click and say "Send to Mail Recipient" and I get this message. I go into the Default Programs and Outlook 2016 is listed as the default mail program, so not sure why it's saying there is none. Perhaps I should try CCleaner to clean up the registry? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a38a40e2-7572-00e1-b193-64f097a9e...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Report Anomaly
Hi John, Try opening your FRX file as a table then browse for the image record: BROWSE FOR objtype=17 FIELDS picture Open up the memo field and look at the exact path and name of the image: for example: "..\yourimage.jpg" How is it relative to your main folder file placements and subfolder where it is stored? -Philip B. On 8/7/2017 2:53 PM, John Weller wrote: Hi Tracy, Not sure what you mean by *copy it out*. For development purposes I put everything in a set of sub-folders within a single main folder. The data is in one sub-folder and the source code, including the image, is in another sub-folder. Both the app and the exe sit next to one another inside the main folder so the path to the image is identical. John John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Sent: 07 August 2017 19:09 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: Report Anomaly John, Is the image in a relative path to the report. The image needs to be on the disk, not in the executable. *(unless you copy it out)* HTH, Tracy -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of John Weller Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 2:00 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Report Anomaly I have written a membership system for a local organisation. I decided to add a facility to email a membership card to a member instead of posting it. I created a report which consists of a jpg image containing the background and base text, a scan of the original blank card, with 3 fields superimposed to hold name, membership no and expiry date. The image is in the page header section as it uses global variables for the data; I tried putting it in the body and using a single record cursor but the system insisted on producing three cards on the same sheet for some reason. The card is produced as a PDF using FoxyPreviewer and sent as an attachment. When I run it from VFP as an app it works perfectly but when I run it from the exe the report contains the data but not the background image. I'm baffled! Any suggestions would be gratefully received :-) John John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/749214eb-850b-caca-5265-fd7bc7a8f...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Report Anomaly
I hope that solves it John. I've had the same issues before so it rang a bell. :-) All the best! -Philip B. On 8/7/2017 5:07 PM, John Weller wrote: Hi Philip, That shows up the problem. I was creating the exe in the source code folder then moving it up a level before running it whereas the app was created at the same level as it was being run at. It's never caused a problem before, I'll have to see how it works outside the development environment now :-) Thanks John John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Sent: 07 August 2017 21:35 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Report Anomaly Hi John, Try opening your FRX file as a table then browse for the image record: BROWSE FOR objtype=17 FIELDS picture Open up the memo field and look at the exact path and name of the image: for example: "..\yourimage.jpg" How is it relative to your main folder file placements and subfolder where it is stored? -Philip B. On 8/7/2017 2:53 PM, John Weller wrote: Hi Tracy, Not sure what you mean by *copy it out*. For development purposes I put everything in a set of sub-folders within a single main folder. The data is in one sub-folder and the source code, including the image, is in another sub-folder. Both the app and the exe sit next to one another inside the main folder so the path to the image is identical. John John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Sent: 07 August 2017 19:09 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: Report Anomaly John, Is the image in a relative path to the report. The image needs to be on the disk, not in the executable. *(unless you copy it out)* HTH, Tracy -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of John Weller Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 2:00 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Report Anomaly I have written a membership system for a local organisation. I decided to add a facility to email a membership card to a member instead of posting it. I created a report which consists of a jpg image containing the background and base text, a scan of the original blank card, with 3 fields superimposed to hold name, membership no and expiry date. The image is in the page header section as it uses global variables for the data; I tried putting it in the body and using a single record cursor but the system insisted on producing three cards on the same sheet for some reason. The card is produced as a PDF using FoxyPreviewer and sent as an attachment. When I run it from VFP as an app it works perfectly but when I run it from the exe the report contains the data but not the background image. I'm baffled! Any suggestions would be gratefully received :-) John John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bfcd330f-2b0e-0c77-5db0-429ddfdd5...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
ReFox Experience
Hi folks, I'm in a difficult situation. I have a new customer who has a VFP app that she designed and owns. She then has customers where this was installed. Her previous programmer had provided her with "source code" so she thought it would be no problem hiring me to take over since the previous developer no longer has time to commit to the ongoing development of this software. I reviewed the "source code" she had to start quote her how much newer changes might cost. In my review of the software, I noticed it is missing: 1) VFP Project Files 2) Menu files (Mnx,Mnt). mpx is there. 3) Some graphic files used. 4) Who knows how many other files are missing? Without the original Project Files, I can't tell what else was used in the project. When she asked her previous programmer for these missing files, she was told they are probably on an old server that he would have to restart and try to retrieve files from it. He said it would probably be easier just having the new developer (me) decompile the EXE to get the source code. Question for you: Does ReFox uncompile an EXE into the actual MNX/MNT and Project Files? I'm thinking no. Probably just the MPR, VCX/T, PRG, etc. Also, I remember from long ago that ReFox would not de-compile any programming notes from the previous PRGs etc. My thought is the previous developer should've provided this to my client since she designed and owns the software. And now, since it is not all there, he should provide it to her. Instead, he wants to charge a hefty bill to start up his old server to retrieve what might be on there and no guarantee that it will all be there. Thanks for any thoughts, Philip B Vicksburg, MI Melissa McCarthy Confirms Unfortunate News track.volutrk.com http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5b6490fa2747f10ef4a37st02duc ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/92ada0bf-a70b-a36d-752d-babd77d11...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: ReFox Experience
Thanks Eric, See you at SW Fox! -Philip On 8/3/2018 3:23 PM, Eric Selje wrote: Yes, as long as the original developer didn't do anything special ReFox will reconstruct the MNX/MNT file. BTW ReFox is a sponsor at Southwest Fox this year - thanks ReFox! Eric On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:06 PM, roger tremblay wrote: I totally agree with the attorney route. Often times it is just like Ted said, one letter usually does the trick. On 8/3/2018 2:52 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: Thanks Ted, I'll pass this recommendation on. If worst comes to worst, do you have any experience with ReFox? Will it decompile MNX/MNT files? She's thinking about purchasing ReFox if need be. Philip On 8/3/2018 2:13 PM, Ted Roche wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: I'm in a difficult situation. I'd say your client is in a difficult situation. A VERY CHEAP solution I've used in the past is to have the client speak to their lawyer (or hire one, they're less expensive than you might think) and have the lawyer write a VERY STERN LETTER to the old programmer informing them on the serious consequences of not providing their former customer with their promised source code in a a workmanlike manner. At no charge. Promptly. In a surprising number of cases, that's enough to resolve the issue. (I have actually called a similar target and asked whether they wanted the papers served to them or if they could provide me with their attorney's contact info, and they folded on the spot, so...) Drink This Before Bed, Watch Your Body Fat Melt Like Crazy Celebrity Local http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5b64a47bf266b24711721st01vuc [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/8e4d3a14-cd43-56a1-54df-ebe791c61...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: ReFox Experience
Thanks Ted, I'll pass this recommendation on. If worst comes to worst, do you have any experience with ReFox? Will it decompile MNX/MNT files? She's thinking about purchasing ReFox if need be. Philip On 8/3/2018 2:13 PM, Ted Roche wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: I'm in a difficult situation. I'd say your client is in a difficult situation. A VERY CHEAP solution I've used in the past is to have the client speak to their lawyer (or hire one, they're less expensive than you might think) and have the lawyer write a VERY STERN LETTER to the old programmer informing them on the serious consequences of not providing their former customer with their promised source code in a a workmanlike manner. At no charge. Promptly. In a surprising number of cases, that's enough to resolve the issue. (I have actually called a similar target and asked whether they wanted the papers served to them or if they could provide me with their attorney's contact info, and they folded on the spot, so...) Drink This Before Bed, Watch Your Body Fat Melt Like Crazy Celebrity Local http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5b64a47bf266b24711721st01vuc ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b82c5d41-2d13-6487-1e30-57d647084...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Old VFP8 app on a Windows 7 computer suddenly fails
I've had something similar happen in the past Tracy. If you don't have the client installation available to re-register the DLLs for VFP8, then running a System Restore on the workstation to point when you knew the VFP8 app still worked might have fixed it. -Philip B. Vicksburg, MI On 2/28/2019 11:56 AM, Tracy Pearson wrote: It won't start. AVG is installed. Here's the details from the Event Viewer message http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event;> - 26 4 0 0x80 907913 System Owner-PC - pcplus9.exe - Application Error The application was unable to start correctly (0xc07b). Click OK to close the application. We are currently seeing if the customer will upgrade to our latest version which is running VFP 9. And uninstalling AVG. Any thoughts? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2243215e-09ba-b0aa-e662-9c363ea27...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP apps and UPS ShipExec SDK
Hi Kurt, I need to get the .NET Class Library and CONFIG file into a DLL so I can load it using wwDotNetBridge.PRG The ShipExec Tech Support really don't want to touch anything, just supply what corporate provides them to sell to a customer so the customer can connect it with their ERP system. I'm used to tapping into COM objects and calling APIs that are established and provided. I just wanted to see if anyone else successfully integrated ShipExec into a VFP app already so I don't have to experiment with it so much and I don't have to invest as much in a .NET developer to create a Client SDK. Thanks, -Philip Borkholder Vicksburg, MI On 5/16/2019 2:08 PM, Kurt @ Gmail wrote: What you want to do - definitely seems to spark a memory inside my old feeble mind. Maybe I had tried working on something like that some YEARS ago! I can even visualize in my head the circumstance - and I think it was for some client project - and they were doing shipments. But, beyond that - I have no recollection. I possibly did that even before I joined this forum! Did you search the archives for anyone else doing something similar? -K- On 5/16/2019 5:58 AM, Philip Borkholder wrote: Hi all, Has anyone worked with the UPS ShipExec SDK .NET Class Library files and a VFP app? I have been presented with a case and I am looking for guidance. Thanks, Philip Borkholder Vicksburg, MI Top Gut Doctor Warns: "Throw Out This Vegetable Immediately" unhealthpublications.com http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5cdd5e753a7065e6a1395st04vuc [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/46a78d2d-fd03-0acb-852d-4801fbd3c...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP apps and UPS ShipExec SDK
Hi all, Has anyone worked with the UPS ShipExec SDK .NET Class Library files and a VFP app? I have been presented with a case and I am looking for guidance. Thanks, Philip Borkholder Vicksburg, MI Top Gut Doctor Warns: "Throw Out This Vegetable Immediately" unhealthpublications.com http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5cdd5e753a7065e6a1395st04vuc ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/efb1a04c-8f20-26dd-8215-f1db1187e...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP and SalesForce CRM Integration
Hello, Has anyone had any experience with integrating SalseForce CRM with a VFP ERP system? Here is their site. https://www.salesforce.com/ I have a customer looking into it. They currently use Sage PRO ERP 7.7 which I support. Thank you Philip B. Vicksburg, MI ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200908.111948.379...@webmail07.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Apps/DBFs with AMD Processor
Thanks guys! Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Alan Bourke" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: VFP Apps/DBFs with AMD Processor Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:50:26 +0100 > In past years I always heard it's best to have Intel processors on > workstations when using VFP apps. It's irrelevant who the CPU vendor is. > > Have any of you had any problems using AMD processors and Windows 10 > with VFP apps? > Any version of AMD processor a better choice? As with any CPU faster is always better. That's about it. What's important is whether VFP runs on a given version of Windows. This is a single-threaded, 32-bit Windows executable and associated DLLs. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200917.132459.2364...@webmail02.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP Apps/DBFs with AMD Processor
Hello all, Not much activity lately. I searched the Archives for this issue but didn't find clarity. In past years I always heard it's best to have Intel processors on workstations when using VFP apps. Have any of you had any problems using AMD processors and Windows 10 with VFP apps? Any version of AMD processor a better choice? Thanks, Philip Borkholder Vicksburg, MI ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200916.142754.1060...@webmail11.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
NF Windows 11 ?
Has anyone heard or know anything about "Windows 11" being released on August 29, 2020? I just had a customer tell me they will be getting Windows 11 machines next month I found this: https://www.window11updates.com/ I thought Windows 10 was the main OS now for MS and they would just be releasing updates to it? If there is any truth to this, has anyone been testing any beta versions with VFP ? Thanks Philip B. Vicksburg, MI ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200720.144826.145...@webmail03.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: ProFox archives error
Thanks Ed! Philip B Sponsored by https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part_medium=uol_campaign=rss_taglines_more The World's Richest Person Is Now Richer Than Ever http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efdf59d71997759d442bst02duc1 Jeffrey Epstein Confidant Ghislaine Maxwell Arrested http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efdf59d8c93b759d442bst02duc2 Hiring Is Stronger Than Expected in June http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efdf59da75f7759d442bst02duc3 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200702.105541.2023...@webmail08.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
We a client using an ERP systems in VFP9 DBFs for their data. One of their users just got a new Dell XPS Notebook it has super slow results.It has an i7-9750H gen Intel processor with Win 10 64bit connecting to Windows Sever Essentials 2012 R2 server It is using a 1GB Card and shows it is connected at 1GB speed.I set the LanManWorkstation settings for to avoid CDX corruption:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] FileInfoCacheLifetime = 0FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=0DirectoryCacheLifetime=0 I have not made any changes with SMB1, 2 or 3 Their Hardware tech sent me this article form 2018 that states (Note: The author wrongfully mentions VFP 10, ignore that, it has nothing to do with this issue)https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2161246-win-10-64bit-latest-intel-processor-slow-accessing-foxpro-over-network Has anyone else experienced super slowness using DBFs in the above situation related to 8th gen Intel processors or higher?NOTE: Other stations are not experiencing this on the same network.We've tried plugging into different ports on the switches and same results. We're kind of desperate to find a solution. (SQL DBs are in the long term plans, but looking for a solution for the DBFs ASAP) Thanks Philip B.Vicksburg, MI Sponsored by https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part_medium=uol_campaign=rss_taglines_more Congress Takes Stand Over Hong Kong Law http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efdf96f762cc796f2039st04duc1 The World's Richest Person Is Now Richer Than Ever http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efdf96f91796796f2039st04duc2 Jeffrey Epstein Confidant Ghislaine Maxwell Arrested http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efdf96fac050796f2039st04duc3 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200702.19.2023...@webmail08.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
Followup question Alan,When you stopped setting these to zero because Win 10 was "fixed" How did you leave the File Server LanManServer settings for :SMB1SMB2SMB3 Some recommendations out there state we need to shut off SMB2 & 3 and turn on SMB1 on newer File Servers This File Server has not shut off SMB2 or 3 My understanding was that the 3 Registry settings I listed were set to zero then to compensate for not shutting of SMB2 & 3 Thanks,Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Alan Bourke" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:44:36 +0100 On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 4:11 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: > I set the LanManWorkstation > settings for to avoid CDX > corruption:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SYSTEM\\CurrentControlSet\\Services\\LanmanWorkstation\\Parameters] > FileInfoCacheLifetime = > 0FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=0DirectoryCacheLifetime=0 Set them back to the defaults again (10 or 15 in each case IIRC), set to zero they can cause serious speed issues and aren't needed unless you are experiencing the particular corruption issues that zeroing them fixes. AFAIK recent Windows 10 versions have fixed whatever MS broke in SMB that caused these corruption issues in VFP (and MS Access). -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200702.132416.2727...@webmail04.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
I just set all three registry settings back to their defaults:DirectoryCacheLifetime=10FileInfoCacheLifetime=10FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=5 There was no increase in speed. Anyone have any other advice? Thanks,Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Philip Borkholder" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:24:16 GMT Followup question Alan,When you stopped setting these to zero because Win 10 was "fixed" How did you leave the File Server LanManServer settings for :SMB1SMB2SMB3 Some recommendations out there state we need to shut off SMB2 & 3 and turn on SMB1 on newer File Servers This File Server has not shut off SMB2 or 3 My understanding was that the 3 Registry settings I listed were set to zero then to compensate for not shutting of SMB2 & 3 Thanks,Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Alan Bourke" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:44:36 +0100 On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 4:11 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: > I set the LanManWorkstation > settings for to avoid CDX > corruption:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParameters] > FileInfoCacheLifetime = > 0FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=0DirectoryCacheLifetime=0 Set them back to the defaults again (10 or 15 in each case IIRC), set to zero they can cause serious speed issues and aren't needed unless you are experiencing the particular corruption issues that zeroing them fixes. AFAIK recent Windows 10 versions have fixed whatever MS broke in SMB that caused these corruption issues in VFP (and MS Access). -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200702.140625.2727...@webmail04.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
Thank you Tracy,I'll review that with my customer. Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Tracy Pearson" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:47:42 -0400 What I have seen is a couple of network bottleneck issues. 1) The VFP exe should be on the local machine and accessing the data on the network. This removes a security layer and a network layer that happens when a section of the binary needs to be read. My VFP exe is over 20 MB. 2) The network card may have a burst setting that is set to high for the network to handle. My laptop is an i7-8550U and the onboard adapter needed to be adjusted. I had issues transferring files between a Linux system and the Windows 10 64-bit laptop over SFTP until I turned off the Burst. Mine is called "Throughput Booster" HTH, Tracy -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 11:11 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors We a client using an ERP systems in VFP9 DBFs for their data. One of their users just got a new Dell XPS Notebook it has super slow results.It has an i7-9750H gen Intel processor with Win 10 64bit connecting to Windows Sever Essentials 2012 R2 server It is using a 1GB Card and shows it is connected at 1GB speed.I set the LanManWorkstation settings for to avoid CDX corruption:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SYSTEM\\CurrentControlSet\\Services\\LanmanWorks tation\\Parameters] FileInfoCacheLifetime = 0FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=0DirectoryCacheLifetime=0 I have not made any changes with SMB1, 2 or 3 Their Hardware tech sent me this article form 2018 that states (Note: The author wrongfully mentions VFP 10, ignore that, it has nothing to do with this issue)https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2161246-win-10-64bit-latest-int el-processor-slow-accessing-foxpro-over-network Has anyone else experienced super slowness using DBFs in the above situation related to 8th gen Intel processors or higher?NOTE: Other stations are not experiencing this on the same network.We've tried plugging into different ports on the switches and same results. We're kind of desperate to find a solution. (SQL DBs are in the long term plans, but looking for a solution for the DBFs ASAP) Thanks Philip B.Vicksburg, MI --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200702.121442.2280...@webmail05.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
Thank you Dave,
We did shut off all the power saving features of the NIOC.
I'll try these other settings.
Philip
-- Original Message --
From: Dave Crozier
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:59:20 +
Philip,
Check the NIOC and set it to default to 1Gb and not use the "Auto" feature to
decide what speed it is running at i.e.
in the Advanced Properties of the network card set Speed & Duplex to be 1.00Gb
and set Auto Disable Gigabit to disabled (if this setting is present).
Also, sometimes the "Green Ethernet" setting allows the NIC to go to sleep so
try disabling this as well.
Dave
Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
T 01706 222 792
E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
Follow us:
Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire, BB4 5HH
This communication and the information it contains is intended for the
person or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are confidential
and may be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail in error you must
not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unauthorised use,
copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.
Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the
risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent via
e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are advised to
run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Flexipol
Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an
e-mail and/or any attachment is received.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have adequate
virus protection.
-
Terms & Conditions:
Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the property in
the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds payment in full of the
price of the goods and all other goods agreed to be sold by the seller to the
buyer for which payment is then due. Until such time as the property in the
goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall hold the goods as the seller's
fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods separate from those of the buyer
and third parties and properly stored protected and insured and identified as
the seller's property but shall be entitled to resell or use the goods in the
ordinary course of its business. Until such time as the property in the goods
passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time
-Original Message-----
From: ProFox On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder
Sent: 06 July 2020 18:30
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
Thank you Ted,
I'll have him test this out.
When I looked at the properties of the NIC driver, it said it was connected at
1GB but that probably is what you were pointing out.
Question to you though: won't the speedtest.net just test the Internet
connection speed rather than the LAN speed?
Thanks,
Philip
-- Original Message --
From: Ted Roche
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 15:07:17 -0400
Phil:
1. Can you confirm the local machine's network is actually running at full
speed? Just because the driver thinks it's connected at 1Gbps doesn't mean it
isn't rejecting 90% of packets. Try https://speedtest.net on this and another
machine on the network to ensure there's not some blockage at the networking
level.
2. Is it possible to (temporarily) move a set of DBFs locally to the machine,
and see if the app runs okay with local data? This will determine if it is the
local machine (bad CPU, bad RAM, something-something-local) or if the problem
is the network or the server. In my experience, there's often a configuration
problem on a new machine that needs adjustment. The machine's logs would show
this.
3. Ensure the new machine is up to date in Windows updates and also drivers
supplied by the vendor -- an amazing number of machines ship with software that
doesn't work until it's updated.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:08 PM Philip Borkholder
wrote:
> I just set all three registry settings back to their
> defaults:DirectoryCacheLifetime=10FileInfoCacheLifetime=10FileNotFound
> CacheLifetime=5 There was no increase in speed. Anyone have any other
> advice?
> Thanks,P
Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
Thank you Ted, I'll have him test this out. When I looked at the properties of the NIC driver, it said it was connected at 1GB but that probably is what you were pointing out. Question to you though: won't the speedtest.net just test the Internet connection speed rather than the LAN speed? Thanks, Philip -- Original Message -- From: Ted Roche To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 15:07:17 -0400 Phil: 1. Can you confirm the local machine's network is actually running at full speed? Just because the driver thinks it's connected at 1Gbps doesn't mean it isn't rejecting 90% of packets. Try https://speedtest.net on this and another machine on the network to ensure there's not some blockage at the networking level. 2. Is it possible to (temporarily) move a set of DBFs locally to the machine, and see if the app runs okay with local data? This will determine if it is the local machine (bad CPU, bad RAM, something-something-local) or if the problem is the network or the server. In my experience, there's often a configuration problem on a new machine that needs adjustment. The machine's logs would show this. 3. Ensure the new machine is up to date in Windows updates and also drivers supplied by the vendor -- an amazing number of machines ship with software that doesn't work until it's updated. On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:08 PM Philip Borkholder wrote: > I just set all three registry settings back to their > defaults:DirectoryCacheLifetime=10FileInfoCacheLifetime=10FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=5 > There was no increase in speed. Anyone have any other advice? > Thanks,Philip > -- Original Message -- > From: "Philip Borkholder" > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors > Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:24:16 GMT > > Followup question Alan,When you stopped setting these to zero because Win > 10 was "fixed" How did you leave the File Server LanManServer settings for > :SMB1SMB2SMB3 Some recommendations out there state we need to shut off SMB2 > & 3 and turn on SMB1 on newer File Servers This File Server has not shut > off SMB2 or 3 My understanding was that the 3 Registry settings I listed > were set to zero then to compensate for not shutting of SMB2 & 3 > Thanks,Philip > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Alan Bourke" > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors > Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:44:36 +0100 > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 4:11 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: > > > I set the LanManWorkstation > > settings for to avoid CDX > > > corruption:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParameters] > > FileInfoCacheLifetime = > > 0FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=0DirectoryCacheLifetime=0 > > Set them back to the defaults again (10 or 15 in each case IIRC), set to > zero they can cause serious speed issues and aren't needed unless you are > experiencing the particular corruption issues that zeroing them fixes. > AFAIK recent Windows 10 versions have fixed whatever MS broke in SMB that > caused these corruption issues in VFP (and MS Access). > > > > -- > Alan Bourke > alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200706.132959.1208...@webmail11.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
Thanks Alan, I don't usually shut off SMB2 or 3 either, just others have suggested it on other forums. It always makes the speed worse. Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Alan Bourke" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:00:09 +0100 I never touch any of that Philip. You want to be running on SMB2 or SMB3. They are orders of magnitude faster than SMB1 and much more secure. In fact on newer Windows servers SMB1 isn't even present any more. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 6:24 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: > Followup question Alan,When you stopped setting these to zero because > Win 10 was "fixed" How did you leave the File Server LanManServer > settings for :SMB1SMB2SMB3 Some recommendations out there state we need > to shut off SMB2 & 3 and turn on SMB1 on newer File Servers This File > Server has not shut off SMB2 or 3 My understanding was that the 3 > Registry settings I listed were set to zero then to compensate for not > shutting of SMB2 & 3 Thanks,Philip > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Alan Bourke" > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors > Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:44:36 +0100 > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 4:11 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: > > > I set the LanManWorkstation > > settings for to avoid CDX > > corruption:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SYSTEM\\CurrentControlSet\\Services\\LanmanWorkstation\\Parameters] > > FileInfoCacheLifetime = > > 0FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=0DirectoryCacheLifetime=0 > > Set them back to the defaults again (10 or 15 in each case IIRC), set > to zero they can cause serious speed issues and aren't needed unless > you are experiencing the particular corruption issues that zeroing them > fixes. AFAIK recent Windows 10 versions have fixed whatever MS broke in > SMB that caused these corruption issues in VFP (and MS Access). > > > > -- > Alan Bourke > alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200706.133106.1208...@webmail11.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors
Thanks Alan,I thought we had to always have them set for Windows 10.I'll try that.-Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Alan Bourke" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:44:36 +0100 On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 4:11 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: > I set the LanManWorkstation > settings for to avoid CDX > corruption:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SYSTEM\\CurrentControlSet\\Services\\LanmanWorkstation\\Parameters] > FileInfoCacheLifetime = > 0FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=0DirectoryCacheLifetime=0 Set them back to the defaults again (10 or 15 in each case IIRC), set to zero they can cause serious speed issues and aren't needed unless you are experiencing the particular corruption issues that zeroing them fixes. AFAIK recent Windows 10 versions have fixed whatever MS broke in SMB that caused these corruption issues in VFP (and MS Access). -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200702.131325.2727...@webmail04.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
ProFox archives error
Internal Server ErrorThe server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. Either the server is overloaded or there is an error in the application. Is there a different site to search ProFox archives?I keep getting this error. Philip B.Vicksburg, MI Sponsored by https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part_medium=uol_campaign=rss_taglines_more In This State, the Party's Over http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efd0fab5712ffab2dbcst02duc1 Fox Anchor Out Amid Sexual Misconduct Accusations http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efd0fab73108fab2dbcst02duc2 Doomed Groom May Have Infected 100 at His Wedding http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efd0fab8e3c9fab2dbcst02duc3 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200701.183453.2926...@webmail09.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Label Dynamic Back Color on objects
Hi folks, Has anyone used the advanced scripting tab in Label Forms for an opaque rectangle to have it's backcolor read from a field in the cursor? I am generating RGB() settings in the underlying cursor to set the back color of a rectangle. I tried to create Property=BackColor and value =evaluate(labelbc) Where the field labelbc had RGB(255,0,148) etc. Thanks Philip B. Vicksburg, MI ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200720.201641.2007...@webmail08.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: NF Windows 11 ?
Thanks guys, I told the customer I had not heard of any talk of Version 11. Philip -- Original Message -- From: "MB Software Solutions, LLC" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: NF Windows 11 ? Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:14:35 -0400 Yeah, I call BS on this one. On 7/20/2020 3:14 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > On the disclaimer page of that site: "The website has no affiliation to > Microsoft company." > > I haven't heard anything about there being a Windows 11. > Looked like a advertising website. > > -Original Message- > From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Philip > Borkholder > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 2:48 PM > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: NF Windows 11 ? > > Has anyone heard or know anything about "Windows 11" being released on > August 29, 2020? > I just had a customer tell me they will be getting Windows 11 machines next > month > I found this: > https://www.window11updates.com/ > > I thought Windows 10 was the main OS now for MS and they would just be > releasing updates to it? > > If there is any truth to this, has anyone been testing any beta versions > with VFP ? > > Thanks > > Philip B. > Vicksburg, MI > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200720.201247.2007...@webmail08.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Label Dynamic Back Color on objects
Good question, Yes. Philip -- Original Message -- From: Richard Kaye To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: Label Dynamic Back Color on objects Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:31:03 + Silly question time. Do you have REPORTBEHAVIOR set to 90? -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 8:17 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Label Dynamic Back Color on objects Hi folks, Has anyone used the advanced scripting tab in Label Forms for an opaque rectangle to have it's backcolor read from a field in the cursor? I am generating RGB() settings in the underlying cursor to set the back color of a rectangle. I tried to create Property=BackColor and value =evaluate(labelbc) Where the field labelbc had RGB(255,0,148) etc. Thanks Philip B. Vicksburg, MI [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20200721.081508.1892...@webmail08.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Setting Class Libraries
Hi all, Quick question that I can't remember the hierarchy. Situation: Running a VFP App compiled in an EXE. This EXE has a VCX class library file compiled into it that the author used. If I have a newer version of the VCX that performs some of the methods cleaner/faster than the one the author used, Can I simply place the newer VCX into the root of the application folder? Will the newer VCX take precedence when the SET CLASSLIBRARY TO command runs in the EXE? Thanks Philip B Vicksburg, MI ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210115.120306.2928...@webmail03.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Setting Class Libraries
Thanks Frank, Second question. What if I set CLASSLIBRARY TO mynewerclass.vcx ADDITIVE IN a hook provided by the author after the EXE starts? Thanks Philip -- Original Message -- From: Frank Cazabon To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Setting Class Libraries Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:21:13 -0400 What is in the exe will be used Frank. Frank Cazabon On 15/01/2021 1:03 pm, Philip Borkholder wrote: > Hi all, > Quick question that I can't remember the hierarchy. > > Situation: > > Running a VFP App compiled in an EXE. > This EXE has a VCX class library file compiled into it that the author used. > > If I have a newer version of the VCX that performs some of the methods > cleaner/faster than the one the author used, > Can I simply place the newer VCX into the root of the application folder? > > Will the newer VCX take precedence when the SET CLASSLIBRARY TO command runs > in the EXE? > > > > Thanks > > Philip B > Vicksburg, MI > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210115.134104.1755...@webmail05.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro 2.6 for Windows App
Thanks guys! -- Original Message -- From: Ted Roche To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: FoxPro 2.6 for Windows App Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:21:29 -0400 If there is any way possible for the client to get their app recompiled into VFP, they will save themselves a lot of headaches. Porting isn't free; you may need to work around / rewrite older code that uses PLBs or MENU TO commands, etc. Older lost source can be recovered with some of the utilities. There's no reason not to try. That said, recent (but perhaps not the most recent) Windows 10 32-bit can run 16-bit windows apps, so there might be a little more time left before the curtain falls. Microsoft has announced they plan to end 32-bit Windows and go fully 64-bit. You *could* run an older Win10 in a VM running 16-bit FPW, but that way leads madness, and would ultimately cost the client more money in the long run. Do a search for 16-bit windows apps on Win32 and you should find lots of articles like: See: https://www.groovypost.com/howto/enable-16-bit-application-support-windows-10/ On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 3:45 PM Philip Borkholder wrote: > Hello all, > > One of my customers still has a FoxPro 2.6 for Windows app running on a > network. They are currently running it on Windows 7 32 bit OS. > > Question I have for you. > Does FoxPro 2.6 have to have a 32 bit hardware (machine) as well as > Windows 32 bit OS ? > Or can it get by running on Windows 7 32 bit OS or even Windows 10 32 bit > OS ? > > What experiences have you had in this situation? > > Their hardware company is getting upset trying to keep them on reliable > machines. > > Thanks, > > Philip Borkholder > Bison Tech Plus > Vicksburg, MI > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210624.230558.210...@webmail02.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
FoxPro 2.6 for Windows App
Hello all, One of my customers still has a FoxPro 2.6 for Windows app running on a network. They are currently running it on Windows 7 32 bit OS. Question I have for you. Does FoxPro 2.6 have to have a 32 bit hardware (machine) as well as Windows 32 bit OS ? Or can it get by running on Windows 7 32 bit OS or even Windows 10 32 bit OS ? What experiences have you had in this situation? Their hardware company is getting upset trying to keep them on reliable machines. Thanks, Philip Borkholder Bison Tech Plus Vicksburg, MI ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210624.154321.2588...@webmail04.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Pringing PDFs via ShellExecute from VFP
Thanks Chris!
-- Original Message --
From: Chris Davis
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Pringing PDFs via ShellExecute from VFP
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 09:43:35 +
Hi Philip
I had the same problem recently and switched with success to
http://www.columbia.edu/~em36/pdftoprinter.html
as sometimes we found adobe would leave itself open so any checks to see if it
was still running couldn't be relied on.
Then using the following ShellExecute code ... you will notice my method on the
form agcheckexe("pdftoprinter.exe"), I have included that code as well as this
basically loops until any previous instances have finished before it launches
again for the next PDF you want to queue up ...
&& PDF PRINT METHOD
LPARAMETERS lcfilename
lcfilename=ALLTRIM(TRANSFORM(lcfilename))
declare INTEGER ShellExecute in shell32 INTEGER handle, STRING @ oper, ;
STRING @ ifile, STRING @ iparam, STRING @ ipath, INTEGER showcmd
lcfile="c:\pdfprinter\pdftoprinter.exe"
lcpath=""
lcparam=["]+lcfilename+["]
DO WHILE thisform.agcheckexe("pdftoprinter.exe")
ENDDO
shellexecute(0,"open",lcfile,lcparam,lcpath,1)
=
&& AGCHECKEXE METHOD
LPARAMETERS tcName, tlTerminate
LOCAL loLocator, loWMI, loProcesses, loProcess, llIsRunning
loLocator = CREATEOBJECT('WBEMScripting.SWBEMLocator')
loWMI = loLocator.ConnectServer()
loWMI.Security_.ImpersonationLevel = 3 && Impersonate
loProcesses = loWMI.ExecQuery([SELECT * FROM Win32_Process WHERE Name = ']
+ tcName + ['])
llIsRunning = .F.
IF loProcesses.Count > 0
FOR EACH loProcess in loProcesses
llIsRunning = .T.
IF tlTerminate
loProcess.Terminate(0)
ENDIF
ENDFOR
ENDIF
RETURN llIsRunning
====
Regards
Chris
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder
Sent: 01 July 2021 20:55
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Pringing PDFs via ShellExecute from VFP
Hi all,
I am currently printing VFP reports in sequence, then using ShellExecute to
print PDFs via their default program (Adobe DC).
I am trying to keep each print job in sequence so they come out in the tray
together:
Example:
WO #1
Drawings for WO #1 (PDF via ShellExecute)
WO #2
Drawings for WO #1 (PDF via ShellExecute)
etc.
What I'm running into is sometimes WO#2 prints out before WO#1's PDF prints
from Adobe DC.
Does anyone have experience in using a Windows API to see if Adobe has printed
the PDF before I can continue printing my next VFP form?
Thanks
Philip B
Bison Tech Plus
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message:
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210702.085218.245...@webmail03.dca.untd.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Pringing PDFs via ShellExecute from VFP
Thanks Mike! -- Original Message -- From: Mike To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Pringing PDFs via ShellExecute from VFP Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 17:19:55 -0500 This seems to be related to your need...at least the input from DSummZZZ. https://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=85 <https://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=85> May need to sort through the output to find what you're looking for. Mike Philip Borkholder wrote: > Hi all, > > I am currently printing VFP reports in sequence, then using ShellExecute to > print PDFs via their default program (Adobe DC). > I am trying to keep each print job in sequence so they come out in the tray > together: > Example: > > WO #1 > Drawings for WO #1 (PDF via ShellExecute) > > WO #2 > Drawings for WO #1 (PDF via ShellExecute) > > etc. > > What I'm running into is sometimes WO#2 prints out before WO#1's PDF prints > from Adobe DC. > > Does anyone have experience in using a Windows API to see if Adobe has > printed the PDF before I can continue printing my next VFP form? > > Thanks > > Philip B > Bison Tech Plus > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210702.085231.245...@webmail03.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Pringing PDFs via ShellExecute from VFP
Hi all, I am currently printing VFP reports in sequence, then using ShellExecute to print PDFs via their default program (Adobe DC). I am trying to keep each print job in sequence so they come out in the tray together: Example: WO #1 Drawings for WO #1 (PDF via ShellExecute) WO #2 Drawings for WO #1 (PDF via ShellExecute) etc. What I'm running into is sometimes WO#2 prints out before WO#1's PDF prints from Adobe DC. Does anyone have experience in using a Windows API to see if Adobe has printed the PDF before I can continue printing my next VFP form? Thanks Philip B Bison Tech Plus ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210701.155454.1189...@webmail01.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxPro 2.6 for Windows App
Thank you Christof. -Philip -- Original Message -- From: Christof Wollenhaupt To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: FoxPro 2.6 for Windows App Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:51:18 +0200 Hi Philip, > Does FoxPro 2.6 have to have a 32 bit hardware (machine) as well as Windows > 32 bit OS ? You need any CPU compatible with Intel x86 or x64 (ARM won't work) and a 32-bit OS. That makes Windows 10 the last version to support 16-bit Windows or DOS programs. -- Christof [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210627.144800.2194...@webmail09.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: looking for a multi-user alternative to view gmail emails
"a slightly less geriatric"
Ha ha ha h... that covers us. :-)
-- Original Message --
From: Ted Roche
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: looking for a multi-user alternative to view gmail emails
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:45:54 -0400
Ken:
If the only reason you are using a MS Exchange server is to read gmail from
a single gmail account, you should eliminate it completely. It's swatting
flies with a howitzer.
Does each user have Outlook installed on their own machine, or are they
sharing a VM or Remote-Desktop'ing into a single machine? If it's a simple
configuration it should be straight-forward and if it's more complex, well,
let us know.
If it's one person per Outlook, you should be able to configure them to
access the Gmail account directly and read the mail there. Log onto Gmail
via a web browser and select the gear icon in the upper right ("Settings")
and "See All Settings" and then the tab labeled "Forwarding and
POP/IMAP" and look for the "Configure your email client" links for the
setup you need to do in Outlook. I'm not positive whether POP (an ancient
protocol) or IMAP (a slightly less geriatric) is more appropriate for your
situation, and you may need to do some experimentation to get the behavior
you want.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:47 PM Ken McGinnis wrote:
> looking for a multi-user alternative (to MS Exchange) to view gmail emails
>
> For more than 10 years I have been using a gmail account for users to
> send support questions. I had that gmail account linked (somehow) to MS
> Exchange hosted by Rackspace. This was recommended by someone on this
> list. It has been working for >10 years and I have long-since forgotten
> how I set all that stuff up.
>
> Now Rackspace no longer supports Exchange 2007 and the Outlook 2007
> client that we use to access exchange and see the emails that came into
> gmail. Hope that makes sense. I think it should be simple to have imap
> and/or POP in the gmail account activated (which it/they
> is/arepro...@leafe.com). It seems like Exchange should be able to 'poll'
> the gmail server and download the email (hope that makes sense). Somehow
> the people at Rackspace don't know what I am talking about?? the support
> person today says I need to set up MX records in gmail so gmail will
> send to exchange? that does not make any sense to me. I admit that I may
> not be the youngest person on this list, but I am still alive and I love
> VFP and most of the support issues. Anyone out there know what I am
> missing?
>
> Thx in advance
>
> Ken
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message:
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210423.173045.2699...@webmail06.dca.untd.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Reports and Insufficient GDI resources (Error 2203)
Hello, Has anyone run into this error with reports: Insufficient GDI resources (Error 2203) This past week all of a sudden multiple customers are receiving this error. I looked it up and found a windows registry key to set the GDI resources from the default 1 to 3 and that resolves the error. Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows\ GDIProcessHandleQuota from 1 to 3 However, why would it just all of a sudden start doing this? I support two different ERP Systems written in Visual Foxpro 9sp2 and both are getting it on large print jobs that used to (prior to this past week) work just fine. Thank you, Philip B Vicksburg, MI ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/20210324.194454.2382...@webmail10.dca.untd.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
