Hi Bill,
Your sentence does not crash (once JE is updated).
Before updating the JE, with the beta-k install package from the website,
it does crash:
JVERSION
Engine: j904/j64/linux
Beta-k: commercial/2023-01-24T04:43:19
Library: 9.04.11
Platform: Linux 64
Installer: J904 install
InstallPath: /h
Can you also confirm this will crash or not
(-/ .*)x: 4 4$_ __ 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 6:36 PM Jan-Pieter Jacobs
wrote:
> I recently had problems with GMP too on my AVX (not AVX2) laptop.
> They seem to be solved with the most recent beta.
> With a fresh install from
I recently had problems with GMP too on my AVX (not AVX2) laptop.
They seem to be solved with the most recent beta.
With a fresh install from the install package "j904_linux64.tar.gz
2023-01-24 17:44 3.4M j904 linux 64-bit" from
http://www.jsoftware.com/download/j904/install/ , I initially got a
If it's the GMP that tripped me up by giving a nonce error on "x:" last
month, you need to
load 'pacman'
install'gmp'
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:26 AM 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming <
programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>
> There is also a numeric library install required (forget which on
There is also a numeric library install required (forget which one) that while
it shouldn't crash without it, will not produce extended results.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 10:31:45 p.m. EST, bill lam
wrote:
We have received reports on the crash but can't reproduce by ourselves
We have received reports on the crash but can't reproduce by ourselves.
Would you give detail of the 2 computers such
linux distro name and version, and
version of glibc ( ldd --version)
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:22 AM Omar Antolín Camarena <
omar.anto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And it no longer
> And it no longer crashes.
There's a little bit of luck involved in that. I use J on two computers, on
one j904 works just fine but on the other doing anything at all using
extended integers makes it crash.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 9:19 PM Mike Duvos wrote:
> Thanks. I got j904 installed fro
Thanks. I got j904 installed from the zips. Surprisingly, it is up to 58
times faster doing modular exponentiation on large extended precision
integers. And it no longer crashes.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:24 PM Devon McCormick wrote:
> It's probably blank because there is no all-in-one instal
It's probably blank because there is no all-in-one installer for 9.04.
Raul is correct that you have to install it from zips.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 8:24 PM Raul Miller wrote:
> I don't know why there's a link to a non-existent all in one page.
>
> For now, I think you have to install it from a
I don't know why there's a link to a non-existent all in one page.
For now, I think you have to install it from a zip archive:
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/Installation/J904/Zips
I hope this helps,
--
Raul
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 7:50 PM Mike Duvos wrote:
>
> I went to the Wiki page
I went to the Wiki page for j904 and clicked on the all-in-one installer
for Windows, and it took me to a Wiki page with nothing on it. Do I have
to install it some other way?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:32 PM Raul Miller wrote:
> When I run (genkey 32) under j903, I get a crash.
>
> When I run
When I run (genkey 32) under j903, I get a crash.
When I run (genkey 32) under j904, it works fine.
A number of issues have been addressed in j904 (and it's almost ready
for release). It might be worth upgrading.
--
Raul
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:21 PM Mike Duvos wrote:
>
> I installed it a f
I installed it a few weeks ago from the link in the wiki to the most recent
stable version. If I click on “about” in jqt , it says…
Engine: j903/j64avx2/windows
It said the beta was for “adventurous users.”
Should I be running a different one?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:01 PM Elijah Stone wr
What version of je are you running? I get innocuous results:
genkey 32
15970092203996114281 4061548213 3932020837
genkey 32
14979749644274477941 4038627851 3709118591
genkey 32
15125320685289546439 3974107847 3805966337
If you are not running the latest beta, I suggest doing so; among
I wrote a brief J script to generate random RSA keys in various lengths. I
put a copy in my Dropbox at the following URL…
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0y0tpgtjtv4vvd2/rsakeys.ijs
In this script is a function called “genkey” which crashes J.
genkey =: 3 : 0"0
q =. p =. randprime y
while. q = p
d
Henry’s reply is relevant. There was a space following )n … I forget the
details of the discussion about this when noun ddefs were introduced.
So back to the jios release, as this occurred in a script copied over from my
Windows environment. The toy example was a cover for slightly more compl
What's in the small box? (Do you have 13{a. in foo?)
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 1:32 PM 'Mike Day' via Programming
wrote:
>
> It’s a moot point whether this should be under programming or beta; it looks
> as if it’s the j engine rather than Ian’s amazing new iOS implementation.
In your toy example there is a space after )n, which creates a row.
Henry Rich
On 10/30/2022 1:32 PM, 'Mike Day' via Programming wrote:
It’s a moot point whether this should be under programming or beta; it looks as
if it’s the j engine rather than Ian’s amazing new iOS implementation.
In Jio
It’s a moot point whether this should be under programming or beta; it looks as
if it’s the j engine rather than Ian’s amazing new iOS implementation.
In Jios for iPad:
NB. A toy example
foo =: {{)n
abcd
efgh
}}
foo NB. Expecting two rows…
abcd
efgh
LF cut foo NB. And two boxes…
The android j902 release is also fixed (Linux in the previous mail).
On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 16:10, Jon Quant wrote:
> Thanks Mike.
>
> I've upgraded to j902 and the problem is fixed. Just starting to learn J,
> so my mind was already being expanded. Glad it's fixed and not my
> understanding...
Thanks Mike.
I've upgraded to j902 and the problem is fixed. Just starting to learn J,
so my mind was already being expanded. Glad it's fixed and not my
understanding... ;)
On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 16:05, 'Mike Day' via Programming <
programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
> This rings a bell ... I thi
This rings a bell ... I think this might have been a problem with an early
beta, forget which version. Later correspondence shows you’re in release beta
901-a, so likely to have been buggy, perhaps.
Cheers,
Mike
Sent from my iPad
> On 14 Sep 2021, at 14:59, Jon Quant wrote:
>
> Dear all,
Hi bill,
On Linux:
Engine: j901/j64/linux
Release-a: commercial/2019-12-12T12:42:27
Library: 9.01.20
Platform: Linux 64
Installer: unknown
InstallPath: /usr/share/j/9.01
Contact: www.jsoftware.com
On Android:
Engine: j901/j64/android
Release-a: commercial/2019-12-21T13:04:08
Library: 9.01.18
J
On my android, I get what you would expect.
kk=.i.5
kk
0 1 2 3 4
] kk=.>:kk
1 2 3 4 5
i.5
0 1 2 3 4
JVERSION
Engine: j902/j64/android
Release-a: commercial/2020-12-10T11:16:47
Library: 9.02.08
J Android: 1.4.12/11/30
Platform: Android 64 (arm64-v8a)
Installer: unknown
InstallPath: /
Are you using the beta version (j903)? please type JVERSION inside J and
show us the output.
If this is actually happening, then it's a bug.
Could be something to do with this:
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/SpecialCombinations#Pre-Parsed_Parenthesized_Primitives_.28.29
On Tue,
What's the version you tested?
JVERSION
This is bug if you reproduce it.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021, 9:59 PM Jon Quant wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have tried the following code and get unexpected results and wanted your
> seasoned advice.
>
>kk=.i.5
>kk
> 0 1 2 3 4
>kk=.>:kk
>kk
> 1 2 3
Thanks Pablo and Devon,
I was expecting both your results. However my Linux j901 and android phone
both give the same odd behaviour.
If I keep reassigning kk=.>:kk then i.5 advances also!!!
On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 15:21, Devon McCormick wrote:
> I get nothing like this, only what one would exp
I get nothing like this, only what one would expect:
kk=.i.5
kk
0 1 2 3 4
kk=.>:kk
kk
1 2 3 4 5
i.5
0 1 2 3 4
You must have done something else too but I can't think what it might be as
I don't think re-assignment of J primitive is possible (in J).
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:03 A
No. I get:
kk=.i.5
kk
0 1 2 3 4
kk=.>:kk
kk
1 2 3 4 5
i.5
0 1 2 3 4
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3:59 PM Jon Quant wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have tried the following code and get unexpected results and wanted your
> seasoned advice.
>
>kk=.i.5
>kk
> 0 1 2 3 4
>kk=.>:kk
>kk
> 1
Dear all,
I have tried the following code and get unexpected results and wanted your
seasoned advice.
kk=.i.5
kk
0 1 2 3 4
kk=.>:kk
kk
1 2 3 4 5
i.5
1 2 3 4 5
kk=.>:kk
i.5
2 3 4 5 6
So this modifies the behaviour of the 'i.' verb! Is there a (functional
programming) grammar
I confirm this: m -. n and m&-. n and even n&(-.~) m are about 5x
faster than -.&n m .
I can't imagine a reason why; I suppose I would need to look at the
source code to see.
Henry Rich
On 10/13/2013 12:52 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
10 ts 'm -. n'
0.0899539 5.24346e6
g=:m&-.
1
k n from -.&n before applying
it to both. Of course it would be nice if it were faster.
- Original Message -
From: Brian Schott
To: "programm...@jsoftware.com"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 12:52:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Odd timings for dyadic not (-.)
10
10 ts 'm -. n'
0.0899539 5.24346e6
g=:m&-.
10 ts 'g n'
0.0908445 5.24365e6
Is the above relevant? Used iPad, pre OS7.
---
(B=)
On Oct 13, 2013, at 12:07 AM, Ganesh Rapolu wrote:
> m =. 1e6 ?@$ 1e6
> n =. 5 ?@$ 1e6
> f =. -.&n
> 10 ts 'm -. n'
> 0.0261088 9.43834e6
> 10
m =. 1e6 ?@$ 1e6
n =. 5 ?@$ 1e6
f =. -.&n
10 ts 'm -. n'
0.0261088 9.43834e6
10 ts 'f m'
0.115288 8.39014e6
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
34 matches
Mail list logo
