Re: [Jprogramming] jajh anyone?

2020-09-01 Thread Raul Miller
Yes indeed, the implementation here uses curl to pull down a jforum
page and execute a sentence inside of it.

If your system uses wget instead, that won't work. I could have made
it more robust, using a longer expression, but that was sort of not
the point.

Take care,

-- 
Raul

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 5:25 PM Jose Mario Quintana
 wrote:
>
> > If we're going to go with obscure large numbers,
>
> Well, the point of providing an argument a couple of hundred orders of
> magnitude higher than necessary to the Turing tar-pit was to emphasize that
> one could easily obfuscate its code indefinitely.  Was it not?
>
> > ".a.{~35+91#.inv".0 :0-.LF
> > 81366029708523506035417756025037363272973280294647519604819263
> > ...
> > )
>
> I just get an error when I try your version, never mind.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:22 PM Raul Miller  wrote:
> >
> > If we're going to go with obscure large numbers, beware of
> > ...
> --
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm


Re: [Jprogramming] jajh anyone?

2020-09-01 Thread Jose Mario Quintana
> If we're going to go with obscure large numbers,

Well, the point of providing an argument a couple of hundred orders of
magnitude higher than necessary to the Turing tar-pit was to emphasize that
one could easily obfuscate its code indefinitely.  Was it not?

> ".a.{~35+91#.inv".0 :0-.LF
> 81366029708523506035417756025037363272973280294647519604819263
> ...
> )

I just get an error when I try your version, never mind.



On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:22 PM Raul Miller  wrote:
>
> If we're going to go with obscure large numbers, beware of
> ...
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm