On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, David Aspinall wrote:
I am keen to use a more modern distributed system but it probably means
choosing an external provider rather than trying to get the University
to provide yet another semi-supported tool that works at the beginning
and then rusts. Sourceforge is the
I'd recommend Savannah (either as a GNU or a non-GNU project).
interesting idea, good choice of VC systems there, not just bzr
Which reminds me: it would be nice to include PG into the GNU ELPA (a
package archive from which Elisp packages can be installed conveniently
via package.el). If
I would not expect a paragraph that starts with modern end with
Sourceforge. They added some half-harted support for Mercurial,
Bazaar, Git some years ago, and people rightly complained that it was
too late and too little.
There are several reasons to suggest sf. One is the provision of
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, David Aspinall wrote:
There are several reasons to suggest sf. One is the provision of trac.
So you actually like trac? As a German I always pronounce it with a very
soft t. Seriously: I am looking for a really good issue tracker for a
few years already, one that
default. There is no real fix, because cvs log cannot generate
all information that belongs to a particular branch. Even Debian
Actually, there is a real fix: convert the CVS repository to some other
(saner?) format like Bazaar or Git, and then use those tools to get the
change log for
