Re: [PG-devel] Possible License Change

2011-12-28 Thread Makarius

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, David Aspinall wrote:


Dear PG developers,

We're considering a change of license for Proof General (Emacs) from GPL 
to a BSD-style license (probably the Modified BSD).  The main reason for 
a change to a more permissive license is so that colleagues at MSR and 
elsewhere can collaborate more easily with us.


I don't mind either way.  BSD-style licensing might give some people the 
warm feeling that they could in principle produce a closed version, but 
this is rather theoretical in practice, since there are always 
dependencies on GPL components.



Makarius
___
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel


Re: [PG-devel] Possible License Change

2011-12-19 Thread Stefan Monnier
> If you have any concerns, please let me know.

I for one only license my code under the GPL, not the BSD license.
Especially for Elisp code which will always end up being linked to GPL'd
code (Emacs or XEmacs, basically).

I see no technical reason why people at MSR (or anywhere else for that
matter) can't contribute Elisp code under the GPL.  BTW, they can still
contribute their own code under the BSD license, and such code can still
be integrated into ProofGeneral without having to change PG's license.


Stefan
___
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel


[PG-devel] Possible License Change

2011-12-19 Thread David Aspinall
Dear PG developers,

We're considering a change of license for Proof General (Emacs) from GPL to a 
BSD-style license (probably the Modified BSD).  The main reason for a change to 
a more permissive license is so that colleagues at MSR and elsewhere can 
collaborate more easily with us.  I expect/hope that this would not impact any 
of the 3rd party packagers and Linux distributions shipping Proof General.

I'm waiting for University folk to discuss further with me on exact details, 
but wanted to check first with PG developers whether anyone would raise 
objection.  The simplest plan is probably to switch license with the next 
release version.  Once there is a clearer proposal for the precise license and 
switch plans, I'll consult on the users list.

If you have any concerns, please let me know.

Best wishes,

 - David

___
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel

-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.