Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-14 Thread ga
Kopie: 01.08.2002 Thema: Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start! 12:33

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-14 Thread ga
Keep this fight off the forum! Mail it directly to the person(s) you want to address, if you think it appropriate. Did they not teach you manners when you were young? Obviously not. Most probably you will start shouting at me now. Send your insults to my given eMail address, not to the forum. Mi

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-13 Thread Sanders, Dave
bject: Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start! Ian - I have waited well over a week here now, thinking about whether or not I should even respond to your little tirade. I have walked away from responding to this some 20 or 30 times or more, during that period. is that Tony appears to

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
The winner of a useless personal argument is the one who first realizes it is useless and who therefore walks away from it, leaving the other(s) raving before an audience which no longer includes this winner (or at least he gives little or no sign of still being present). One who is most inten

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-13 Thread JaMi Smith
02 1:50 AM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start! > On 11:24 PM 31/07/2002 -0700, JaMi Smith said: > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-01 Thread Igor Gmitrovic
Ian, well said. People have tried to hint before that it has gone over the top. Igor -Original Message- From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 1 August 2002 6:51 PM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start! On 11:24 PM 31/07

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-01 Thread Damon Kelly
> Sent: Thursday, 1 August 2002 18:51 > To: Protel EDA Forum > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start! > > > On 11:24 PM 31/07/2002 -0700, JaMi Smith said: > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-01 Thread Rich Thompson
Finger hovering over the JaMi block... Ian Hehe, well said Ian. I don't think I ever had to kill filter anyone on a mailing list before :-) Here's hoping I never have to. JaMi, please chill out a little, this isn't a playground. These arguments have been fun to watch but are getting

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-01 Thread Brock Russell
Ian wrote: >I will put it to the group. Who has played the more constructive role in >the forum over the past years. Who would you most like to shut-up? You are an asset to this group Ian. Brock * Tracking #: D0E1A009

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-01 Thread Duane Foster
Well said... I definitely appreciate Ian's contribution to this forum. Duane -Original Message- From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:51 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start! On 11:24 PM 31/07

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-01 Thread ga
You make your point very clear, Ian. I am with you. Concerning the bug list you manage: Did you add the bug in gerber generation of renamed layers and the bug in translating layer information to Specctra to the list, which I described some weeks ago? I never received any comment to these mails.

Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. - Flame start!

2002-08-01 Thread Ian Wilson
On 11:24 PM 31/07/2002 -0700, JaMi Smith said: >- Original Message - >From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:09 PM >Subject: Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. > > > > As others have told you, there are re