Re: [PEDA] Suggestions for improving Protel...

2001-05-07 Thread Geoff Harland

I don't think that this item has been listed previously during this thread:

- (Pcb Server): When a pad uses the Pad Stack feature (i.e. when the Use
Pad Stack checkbox in the Properties Tab of the Pad dialog box is
checked), the X-Size and Y-Size distances displayed in the Properties Tab
(of the Pad dialog box) are *always* the same as the corresponding
distances displayed for the *Top* layer within the Pad Stack Tab (of the
Pad dialog box). That is indeed appropriate if the pad concerned is on one
of the top layers, i.e. the Top Overlay, Top Solder Mask, Top Paste Mask,
or Top signal/copper layer. However, a good case could be made for saying
that this is *not* appropriate if the pad is on any of the other layers. If
the pad concerned is on one of the bottom layers, i.e. the Bottom Overlay,
Bottom Solder Mask, Bottom Paste Mask, or Bottom signal/copper layer, then
the distances displayed in the Properties Tab should *instead* be the same
as the corresponding distances displayed for the *Bottom* layer within the
Pad Stack Tab. And if the pad concerned is on any of the remaining layers,
then the distances displayed in the Properties Tab should be the same as
the corresponding distances displayed for the *Middle* layer within the Pad
Stack Tab.

Another aspect of the current situation is that if the Use Pad Stack
checkbox (in the Properties Tab of the Pad dialog box) is changed from a
checked state to an unchecked state, then the dimensions of the pad on *all*
layers (top, middle, and bottom) are changed to the previous dimensions of
the pad on its Top layer (as previously listed in the Pad Stack Tab of the
Pad dialog box). Again, that should only be the case if the pad is on one
of the top layers.

Maybe not the biggest of issues. But still annoying in some situations when
de-pad-stacking pads that are not on one of the top layers. Pcb files
that were previously created using Adv Pcb 2.8 can be problematic in this
regard.

Regards,
Geoff Harland.
-
E-Mail Disclaimer
The Information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
confidential and not for public display.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To join or leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Suggestions for improving Protel...

2001-05-07 Thread Jim Mcgrath


Hi All,

I feel I have to comment on this, maybe a liitle off of  Geoff's line but the
2.8
comes into play. I have asked in the past that the pads stack include
EVERYTHING down to the plane layers, spokes, spacing, gaps, etc
as it was done in 2.8.

Geoff, I don't know if you remember but I sent you the reasons why, directly
to you Email address. You said you would look into it.

Since the rules set up toatally disregards the planes that emphasises the fact
that
this needs to be implimented at the DDB level which is equal to the PCB
level of 2.8. Not as a Rule setup!

It is something that was completely lost in the upgrade to SE.

If You can't tell it Is ticking me off.

Reagrds to all,

Jim

snip
Geoff Harland wrote:


 Maybe not the biggest of issues. But still annoying in some situations when
 de-pad-stacking pads that are not on one of the top layers. Pcb files
 that were previously created using Adv Pcb 2.8 can be problematic in this
 regard.

 Regards,
 Geoff Harland.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To join or leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *