Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
> The "multilayer" layer causes all kinds of problems. For example, vias live
> on "multilayer," intrinsically. But blind and buried vias are most
> certainly not on every copper layer. As as result of how Protel treats
> "multilayer" and vias, one cannot get a true,
At 01:50 PM 11/9/01 +1100, Geoff Harland wrote:
>However, I also consider that efforts to change or enhance pad and via
>objects would open a very large can of worms. Amongst the issues to consider
>(but certainly not the only issues concerned) are whether properties
>associated with the Solder M
> >P99SE SP6, PCB Editor
> >
> >With Top Solder Mask and Outline (I name Mechanical 1 "Outline") enabled,
> >as initially displayed, with Outline being the current layer, only actual
> >primitives on the Solder Mask and Outline layers are displayed. The
> >calculated solder mask pads are not displ
At 11:31 AM 11/9/01 +1100, Ian Wilson wrote:
>I think I would like to be able to define named collections of layers that
>can be used during pad stack creation and display manipulation. With this
>technique, multi-layer as an explicit layer is no longer needed - it
>merely becomes a layer coll
At 06:56 PM 8/11/01 -0500, you wrote:
>P99SE SP6, PCB Editor
>
>With Top Solder Mask and Outline (I name Mechanical 1 "Outline") enabled,
>as initially displayed, with Outline being the current layer, only actual
>primitives on the Solder Mask and Outline layers are displayed. The
>calculated s
P99SE SP6, PCB Editor
With Top Solder Mask and Outline (I name Mechanical 1 "Outline") enabled,
as initially displayed, with Outline being the current layer, only actual
primitives on the Solder Mask and Outline layers are displayed. The
calculated solder mask pads are not displayed.
If one c
