In a recent discussion on re-annotation a regular poster to this forum was
skeptical that the synchronizer would cope with large scale changes to
designators, including resetting and then re-running the Sch annotation
process. This shows signs of "old-style netlist thinking" where one had to
On 11:53 AM 16/07/2001 +0100, Andrew Ircha said:
><..Snip..>
>You're close but not quite there. I was making modification in one
>library, hiting UpdatePCB (which presents as a button in the explorer
>panel), and instead of putting my new, freshly changed footprint into
>the open PCBs, it was taki
Dennis,
the initial cost for the software based version is $595USD for a
three user license (they don't have a single user license). The book version
is now a single CDROM and it is priced at $495. We had previously subscribed
to the printed book version and it had been approx. $400 I beli
thanks Brad
so i take it you think it is worth it?
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
>
> Dennis,
> the initial cost for the software based version is $595USD for a
> three user license (they don't have a single user license). The book version
> is now a single CDROM and it is priced
Dennis,
yes I think it is worth it. I have used the SMT+ system for approx.
7 years. Formerly I was sitting and doing the calculations by hand based
upon their methods. Sometimes this was painful to calculate all the pad
sizes and then the precise pad centers. This was before my present em
Just to jump in in defense of Maxim...I use a lot of their power supply and
communication related parts (MAX724, MAX1480, MAX1490, MAX488 etc...) and
they have been very good with samples and lead times through Maxim direct
sales even for small volumes ( less than 50 pieces sometimes..)
Maybe they
their parts are good
but I have not had your experience with availability
Dennis Saputelli
Madhu Annapragada wrote:
>
> Just to jump in in defense of Maxim...I use a lot of their power supply and
> communication related parts (MAX724, MAX1480, MAX1490, MAX488 etc...) and
> they have been very go
that's a great recommendation
i guess now i'll have to buy it!
thanks
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
>
> Dennis,
> yes I think it is worth it. I have used the SMT+ system for approx.
> 7 years. Formerly I was sitting and doing the calculations by hand based
> upon their methods.
Andrew Ircha wrote:
> You're close but not quite there. I was making modification in one
> library, hiting UpdatePCB (which presents as a button in the explorer
> panel), and instead of putting my new, freshly changed footprint into
> the open PCBs, it was taking a footprint with the same name
At 08:52 PM 7/15/01 -0700, Dennis Saputelli wrote:
>the problem with single point grounds is that they used to work
>in the current hi speed hi freq environment they don't work anymore
>(according to info in the SI list)
Right. There remain applications for nets which are maintained as distinct
Has anyone ever tried to modify or add to the help menu ? Is this possible ?
If anyone knows how to add menu items which link to text documents in the
help menu structure please let me know.
Thanks,
Daniel Webster
PCB Designer
Northern Airborne Technology
Kelowna, BC, Canada
THIS EMAIL AND AN
sounds better than RelCalc from www.t-cubed.com which I used at my previous employer.
Cheers!
Drew
- Original Message -
From: "Brendon Slade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] MTBF Software
> Not wa
At 09:20 PM 7/16/01 +1000, Ian Wilson wrote:
>In a recent discussion on re-annotation a regular poster to this forum was
>skeptical that the synchronizer would cope with large scale changes to
>designators, including resetting and then re-running the Sch annotation
>process.
C'est moi.
> Th
13 matches
Mail list logo
