> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am happy to
> post them but I suspect that some people may get uppity for some
> reason. If a few people are interested in comparison between
> DXP and P99SE
> I will pass comment, otherwise I will do it much more r
Dear sir:
In
placing polygon ground, there always exist some tiny polygon, these
tiny trace will interfer signal trace.
I
have 2 methods to deal with this:
1: dobule click the polygon plane, unlock primitive ,then modify the tiny
traces.
The
Ian,
Let me get this straight.
So what you are saying here is that there really is no proper
update footprint?? (reason Protel does not understand the word
update) By that I mean if I have a library of footprints then
change say 10 of them. These 10 were used in a design.
I now would like to be abl
Hi,
That would be interesting, like me who have to convince my boss as to why we
should migrate to DXP.
Thanks Julian, you have made my view come to light.
jeyaraman
- Original Message -
From: "Julian Higginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesda
At 28/05/2003 03:03, Julian wrote:
I think it's interesting
snip_snip
Maybe if you start a convention where you flag the header with {compare} or
{DXP/99SE} or something, those people who don't like it can delete the
messages unread.
Good idea! Even for the folks who _are_ interested (like me
> In placing polygon ground, there always exist some tiny polygon, these
tiny trace will interfer signal trace.
When placing or editing the polygon plane, click on the "Remove dead copper"
box. This will clear all unconnected copper "bits"
Ian Rozowsky
R&D Director
Centurion Systems (Pty) Ltd.
Bo
On 11:25 AM 28/05/2003, =?big5?B?Ik1pYW8sIFlpLUp1biAowVukQLZ2IElBQy1OKSI=?=
said:
Dear sir:
In placing polygon ground, there always exist some tiny
polygon, these tiny trace will interfer signal trace.
I have 2 methods to deal with this:
1: dobule click the p
