Tim,
One thing that was not discussed tha tyou may or may not know about, and
which may be helpful to you is the issue of spacing of your Polygon Plane
from all other features of your board.
In the absence of any special clearance rules (which you can set up), the
Polygon Plane will default to
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:10 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: JaMi Smith
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Best settings for polygon fill on signal layer?
Tim,
One thing that was not discussed tha tyou may or may not know about, and
which may be helpful to you is the issue of spacing of your Polygon
Tim,
first my observations. I have always found that 45 degree polygons
are a lot slower than 90 degree polygons at repouring. Since yours is
completely filled I don't see where 45 degree is doing anything for you.
Second, rather than using a grid matching the track width, I normally use
what about the question of octagon vs arcs on the pours?
we use the arcs (without notable problems) for whatever that is worth
they look nice anyway
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Tim,
first my observations. I have always found that 45 degree polygons
are a lot slower than
: [PEDA] Best settings for polygon fill on signal layer?
Tim,
first my observations. I have always found that 45 degree polygons
are a lot slower than 90 degree polygons at repouring. Since yours is
completely filled I don't see where 45 degree is doing anything for you.
Second, rather than
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Best settings for polygon fill on signal layer?
what about the question of octagon vs arcs on the pours?
we use the arcs (without notable problems) for whatever that is worth
they look nice anyway
Dennis Saputelli
