Sucre Mommer? (See Adrian Belew crica 1983?, "The Mommer")
;)
aj
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On 02:08 PM 16/01/2003 -0500, Joe Sapienza said:
> >it's only money
>
> Yes but who's?
>
>>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On 02:08 PM 16/01/2003 -0500, Joe Sapienza said:
it's only money
Yes but who's?
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manag
it's only money
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Cad worthy Plasma screen.
>
> For a mere 7K or so, that is... I sure wish I worked
Partly depends on the accuracy of the monitor. For something with lousy
focuse, there's not much that an increase pixel count will do to improve the
situation.
partly depends on the tolerance of the user to small workspace.
For me, 16x12 is about right, but 1280x1024 or even 1024x768 will do in a
For a mere 7K or so, that is... I sure wish I worked for someone who'd cough
that up for a monitor...
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]>
>
> You can never have enough, just stop at what you can afford...
>
> I have two x 21" 1600 x 1200 @ 85Hz, the IBM moni
You can never have enough, just stop at what you can afford...
I have two x 21" 1600 x 1200 @ 85Hz, the IBM monitor has more
pixels than my two together... now that IBM would cool :)
Darren Moore
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Higginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> BTW, I'm inter
> From: Steve Wiseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Yep - not cadworthy... Start saving for this instead.
> http://www.lcdspecifications.com/ibmpdfs/MD22292A1.pdf
>
3840x2400 pixels? This seems a bit like overkill to me. And it would cost
more than your protel license.
I use a decent 19" CRT run
: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Cad worthy Plasma screen.
> 15/01/2003 22:14:07, "Brian Guralnick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Has anyone seen a CAD worthy Plasma screen? At least an ''authentic'' 1280x1024,
> or 160
15/01/2003 22:14:07, "Brian Guralnick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Has anyone seen a CAD worthy Plasma screen? At least an ''authentic'' 1280x1024,
or 1600x1200.
>
>I have seen a few 28...42 inch plasma screens & they all sucked.
Yep - not cadworthy... Start saving for this instead.
http://www.
