-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [Design] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:00 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint specifications
If Protel could assign a different footprint for rotation, or side,
based on some sort
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint specifications
-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [Design] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
On 07:07 AM 17/03/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [Design] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:00 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint specifications
If Protel could assign a different
and therefore lots of money.
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Leo Potjewijd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 5:24 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint specifications
At 10-03-04 18:36, Ray Mitchell wrote:
I'm sure
-Original Message-
From: Ray Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 5:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint specifications
Hello,
I'm sure this is a repeat, but is there a simple
specification readily available that gives
Everyone,
Thanks for all the responses on footprints. This whole issue is pretty
sickening actually. Since we produce low quantities of diverse products we
have no dedicated PCB layout people. All engineers do their own circuit
designs and parts specification and ultimately are expected to
RSD Communications ltd
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWWhttp://www.rsd.tv
==
-Original Message-
From: Ray Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:48 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint
TEST.
-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [Design] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 2:49 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint specifications
Ray
I know your pain, I started off life as a designer, then a
layout engineer
I use IPC-SM-782 (Surface Mount Design and Land Pattern Standard) from www.ipc.org. I
am not a member but can but publications from them at non-member prices. IPC-SM-782
does not have all IC footprints but has many standard parts.
Another resource (for IC footprints) is Philips Integrated
Hi Ray,
The spec for surface mount footprints is IPC-782A with amendments 1 and
2. Since you are in Government, you probably have a copy available in your
command library. If not, standards are for sale through www.ipc.org
At 09:36 AM 3/10/04, you wrote:
Hello,
I'm sure this is a repeat,
[At the risk of sounding like a commercial...]
Try this link Ray, and see if what they are doing will help.
http://www.pcblibraries.com/
A good friend of mine, Tom Hausherr, has been working on a common industry
library with the IPC and has come out with a product that they think will
help
At 10-03-04 18:36, Ray Mitchell wrote:
I'm sure this is a repeat, but is there a simple specification readily
available that gives the commonly accepted (if there is such a thing)
dimensions for 0402, 0603, ..., SIOC-14, etc., and all the other
standard footprints? I don't really want to wade
12 matches
Mail list logo
