Comment #14 on issue 187 by austin.l...@gmail.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
I was able to use Keaton's plugin as a starting point and am using it now.
I didn't know that the protobuf compiler was that
Comment #11 on issue 187 by ken...@google.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
Hi all,
Attached is a little protoc plugin written in Python which converts all the
inputs to LITE_RUNTIME -- including renaming
Comment #12 on issue 187 by ken...@google.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
s/code code/core code/
s/retains/remains/
*sigh*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #7 on issue 187 by ken...@google.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
If you just want to append a string to the file, you can easily do that
like:
cp foo.proto foo2.proto
echo 'option
Comment #8 on issue 187 by dima: Command-line argument to override
the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
Now suppose foo.proto is imported by a few other .proto files... You'll
have to modify each one of them, too.
Every other compiler - gcc,
Comment #9 on issue 187 by ken...@google.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
I agree that protoc should provide something. I was merely pointing out
that eshober's suggestion can trivially be implemented
Comment #10 on issue 187 by esho...@fusionio.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
Admittedly, my suggestion above does not handle imports and that makes it
mostly unusable whether done in or outside of protoc.
Comment #6 on issue 187 by esho...@fusionio.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
What about an even more generic implementation where you can optionally poke
arbitrary strings into the file from the commandline?
Comment #5 on issue 187 by esho...@fusionio.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
We also need this feature. We're sharing .proto files between applications.
One of the apps has a requirement to be optimized
Comment #4 on issue 187 by ken...@google.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
I agree, we should be able to override options on the command-line. The
only problem
is that it's unclear how far this support
Comment #3 on issue 187 by mike.weller: Command-line argument to override
the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
This is something I've always thought was needed. It makes much more sense
to me to
define these kinds of options on the command line so
Comment #1 on issue 187 by dima: Command-line argument to override
the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
Actually, the patch is wrong... It overrides optimize_for if it's set
in .proto
files, but does not override the default value.
--
You
Comment #2 on issue 187 by n...@chromium.org: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
Would it be much more difficult to support arbitrary option overrides on
the command
line?
--
You received this message because
13 matches
Mail list logo
