[protobuf] Re: Issue 607 in protobuf: Replace TSan API declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Comment #8 on issue 607 by gli...@chromium.org: Replace TSan API declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607 Niall, which Clang version are you using? Clang 3.5 must have this header (in fact we've just checked

[protobuf] Re: Issue 607 in protobuf: Replace TSan API declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Comment #9 on issue 607 by nialldouglas14: Replace TSan API declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607 I would assume at the time of report I would be running 3.4 as 3.5 wasn't out yet. Actually, until that

[protobuf] Re: Issue 607 in protobuf: Replace TSan API declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Updates: Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #10 on issue 607 by xiaof...@google.com: Replace TSan API declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607 Yes, I think we need to make the header work on Clang 3.4

[protobuf] Re: Issue 607 in protobuf: Replace TSan API declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Comment #11 on issue 607 by nialldouglas14: Replace TSan API declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607 I can verify someone else's work after they have tested it themselves. I don't believe I am authorised by

[protobuf] Re: Issue 329 in protobuf: Add support for [deprecated = true] on all types of definitions

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: xiaof...@google.com Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0 Comment #4 on issue 329 by xiaof...@google.com: Add support for [deprecated = true] on all types of definitions https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=329 The deprecated annotation is

[protobuf] Re: Issue 330 in protobuf: add the possiblity to choose TextFormat default printer in java

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WontFix Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #5 on issue 330 by xiaof...@google.com: add the possiblity to choose TextFormat default printer in java https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=330 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You

[protobuf] Re: Issue 334 in protobuf: Let ExtendableMessage.getExtensionFields() be public for Java runtime!

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WontFix Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #1 on issue 334 by xiaof...@google.com: Let ExtendableMessage.getExtensionFields() be public for Java runtime! https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=334 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You

[protobuf] Re: Issue 335 in protobuf: migrate repository to git

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 335 by xiaof...@google.com: migrate repository to git https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=335 Our github site is now live at: https://github.com/google/protobuf -- You received this message because this project is configured to

[protobuf] Re: Issue 339 in protobuf: maven hangs on windows when compiling protobuf java

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: OutOfScope Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #1 on issue 339 by xiaof...@google.com: maven hangs on windows when compiling protobuf java https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=339 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 349 in protobuf: ShortDebugString making core

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: CannotReproduce Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #2 on issue 349 by xiaof...@google.com: ShortDebugString making core https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=349 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this

[protobuf] Re: Help try out Protocol Buffers 2.6.1rc1

2014-10-13 Thread Feng Xiao
Sticking this to the top as the group is spammed by me closing obsolete issues... On Thursday, October 9, 2014 3:56:38 PM UTC-7, Feng Xiao wrote: Hi all, I just tagged v2.6.1rc1 and uploaded release packages here: https://github.com/google/protobuf/releases/tag/v2.6.1rc1 This is a minor

[protobuf] Re: Issue 226 in protobuf: Python API doesn't support reading/writing delimited messages

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Comment #5 on issue 226 by nadersal...@gmail.com: Python API doesn't support reading/writing delimited messages https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226 Any reason why? -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 361 in protobuf: Fix warnings

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WontFix Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #15 on issue 361 by xiaof...@google.com: Fix warnings https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=361 Closing this as WontFix. If you still get warnings with the newly released 2.6.0, please help file an

[protobuf] Re: Issue 361 in protobuf: Fix warnings

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Comment #16 on issue 361 by dholb...@gmail.com: Fix warnings https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=361 RE: It's the convention at Google to use int as loop counters, which makes it pointless to update the code to use size_t Surely the max-value that the loop counter is compared

[protobuf] Re: Issue 364 in protobuf: Make static serialization and deserialization of messages in java

2014-10-13 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WontFix Owner: xiaof...@google.com Comment #3 on issue 364 by xiaof...@google.com: Make static serialization and deserialization of messages in java https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=364 We are considering adding a new Java implementation