Comment #14 on issue 298 by matteo.c...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
It shouldn't be this difficult. maven-bundle-plugin can generate a proper
OSGi manifest, any reason why this is taking so long? :)
Comment #15 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Sorry, I didn't have enough time to work on protobuf opensource release for
the last few weeks.
As to the OSGi manifest, the change se
Comment #16 on issue 298 by matteo.c...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
OSGi is the defacto standard to build modular java applications. Many
groups have done the wrapping themselves (see
http://mvnrepo
Comment #5 on issue 344 by elivei...@gmail.com: Compile Error in Visual
Studio 2010 and 2011 (developer preview)
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=344
Thanks. I worked around this by disabling the tests.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Comment #17 on issue 298 by cjdo...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Re: "it doesn't seem right to me that we should change protobuf to make it
conform to the specification of a certain container." All Apa
Comment #18 on issue 298 by rocketra...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
"it doesn't seem right to me that we should change protobuf to make it
conform to the specification of a certain container." --> In
Comment #19 on issue 298 by cvgav...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
I would like to use protobuf (in its latest version) in my equinox project
too... Today I had to use a old version that was wrapped by
Comment #20 on issue 298 by m...@thebishops.org: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Protobuf is about enabling optimal data transfer between devices and
servers. OSGi is about java software on mobile devices as well as
Comment #21 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
I have no idea of how widely OSGi is used in the open source community. Is
it the suggested way to add OSGi meta data to every Java ja
Comment #22 on issue 298 by matteo.c...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
This is the best way to add suport in my opinion since the manifest file
gets generated and there's no room for mistakes there ->
Comment #23 on issue 298 by cjdo...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Re: "Is it the suggested way to add OSGi meta data to every Java jar?" Yes.
Increased modularity is Java's future, and OSGi is the domin
Comment #24 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
OK, I'll patch the change suggested in comment #7 to the trunk soon. Thanks
for your info.
--
You received this message because you
Comment #25 on issue 298 by debroux@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
It could be good to have two different artifacts for the full-blown version
and the significantly smaller and leaner lite version...
Comment #26 on issue 298 by rocketra...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
If you have a lite and full jar, from an OSGi perspective, it is better
*not* to distinguish the package exports i.e. for the packag
Is there any open source implementaion using USB as transport mechanism?
At our company we are planning to use USB, Let me know if there are any 3rd
party implementors.
Best Regards,
Rahu.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
T
Hi,
Does anyone know how to use protobuf with qpid? Are there any documents or
tutorial that I can get familiar with?
Thanks,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.
This position is working on services to support the Enterprise Security
Master.
It will be integrating with our clients enterprise cache and with services
to deliver essential security master data to large volumes of consumers
with optimal performance.
Requires demonstrated proficiency in
Hello,
I have the same problem. I genereted message from proc file and there is
not an "toByteAray()" method. Even after I call build() I do not have
possibility to use toByteArray(). It is quite strange because there is
method parseparseFrom(byte[] data)..
On Thursday, October 13, 2011 3:52:
Hello Mark.
Is it possible for me to serialize and deserialize a list directly? Like
this:
public static void Serialize(T obj, string filename)
{
//Serialize
using (FileStream stream = File.Open(filename, FileMode.Create))
{
Serializer.
Hi,
If i try to use ProtoMember and DataMember attributes together for one
field, a "Duplicate field-number detected; 1 on: " error posted.
I have tried:
[DataMember]
[ProtoMember(1, AsReference = true)]
or
[DataMember(Order = 1)]
[ProtoMember(1, AsReference = true
Hi,
is there an option to have TextFormat::Print use hexadecimal instead of
octal for "bytes"?
What I would like to see out of TextFormat::Print, for a *bytes* field (not
*string*), is something like:
*bcdnumber: "\x12\x34\x5F"*
instead of what is currently shown:
*bcdnumber: "\0224_"
*
Not some
Is there a way to attach one protocol buffer message to another as an
arbitrary extension, i.e. without declaring it as an extension of the
containing one? I realize that I could use a 'bytes' field in the container
message instead of relying on extensions, but I'd prefer not to do this as
my c
22 matches
Mail list logo
