[protobuf] AddAllocated, how to use and what version was it introduced

2015-08-10 Thread Carl
witch to 2.6.1 I am still not seeing it. Is this a Protocol Buffer 3.x feature? If so how stable is 3.x? Regards Carl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[protobuf] Re: AddAllocated, how to use and what version was it introduced

2015-08-10 Thread Carl
Please disregard found it in 2.6.1 On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 8:34:16 AM UTC-4, Carl wrote: > > I have an allocated PB message that I want to have "adopted" by another > message with a repeated field. > > I have come across this snippet: > > foo->mutabl

[protobuf] Deleting a message from a repeated message (ver. 2.6 PB)

2015-10-02 Thread Carl
g. (seems I am not the only one who struggles with this) Thanks. Regards Carl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubsc

[protobuf] Protocol Buffers 3.0 and JSON, just what does that mean.

2016-06-13 Thread Carl
? Is there an example of how a C++ app can read/write a PB to JSON. I already have a include file (.h) generated via protoc (ver 3) and don't see a published UI. Thanks Carl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group.

[protobuf] Joining multiple protocol buffer packages into a single C++ namespace?

2012-08-29 Thread Carl
e I missed something in the doc, because the script the refactor the output of N number of packages gets real ugly. Regards Carl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://grou

[protobuf] Re: Joining multiple protocol buffer packages into a single C++ namespace?

2012-09-02 Thread Carl
Found the answer: Package MathPB; becomes Package WrapperPackage.MathPB; puts it all in a c++ namespace WrapperPackage Regards Carl On Monday, August 27, 2012 10:39:41 AM UTC-4, Carl wrote: > > Greetings: > > I know that using a line like this: > > Pack

[protobuf] Re: Trying to create 2.5 on Win7 / Cygwin with CL 15 (MSVS 2008)

2013-10-31 Thread Carl
After finding a virgin copy of VS 2008 express (not easy to do), I was able to build build what I needed using the Visual Studio process. Regards Carl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this grou

[protobuf] Re: Protocol Buffer using QT creator

2014-03-05 Thread Carl
s oodles of dll are missing. (Qt creator puts them in it's path which is why that works) To figure out which dlls are missing run "depends" (http://www.dependencywalker.com/), read it's doc first some dlls are expected to be missing. That should get you going. Regards Car

[protobuf] Case insensitive languages and field names

2023-11-04 Thread Carl Gay
mpty being renamed to PBEmpty, but that's not a problem for Dylan.) Thoughts? Prayers? Thanks. -Carl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an em

[protobuf] Re: Case insensitive languages and field names

2023-11-04 Thread Carl Gay
On Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 11:49:41 PM UTC-4 Carl Gay wrote: Hi. I'm implementing <https://github.com/cgay/protocol-buffers> protocol buffers for a case-insensitive language (Dylan) and I'm wondering if there's prior art that would give me an idea how to handl

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protocol Buffers 3.0 and JSON, just what does that mean.

2016-06-15 Thread Carl Slater
Chad You nailed it thank you thank you. Where should I have seen this in the doc? Seems the class TypeResolver was the missing link, but this is my first exposure to it. Again thanks. Regards Carl On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:02 AM Chad Beaulac wrote: > Attached is a GT

[protobuf] Creating Dummy Protos

2012-09-10 Thread Carl Mastrangelo
Noogler here, I am wondering if there is a good way to test methods that take protos as parameters? For each of my test methods, I seem to have to create a pretty complicated proto only to set a single field nested deep inside. This results in a lot of setup code for my tests. Is there a fas

[protobuf] Re: Protobuf Pull Request

2017-02-03 Thread &#x27;Carl Mastrangelo' via Protocol Buffers
+protobuf On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 6:13:33 AM UTC-8, al...@ly.st wrote: > > Can anyone on this list help get this work on google/protobuf completed? > https://github.com/google/protobuf/pull/2635 > > I'm trying to add support for manylinux wheels so that Python users get > the fast protobu