I often have situations like this:
void do_something(const std::string value)
{
my_proto_buffer.set_value(value);
// serialize my_proto_buffer to a stream
}
Would it be valid to do this:
void do_something(const std::string value)
{
Giving this a bump. This might also be considered a feature request (the
ability to temporarily assign a string value to a protocol buffer during
serialization, rather than copying it).
--Kevin
On Friday, March 8, 2013 1:49:29 PM UTC-8, Kevin Regan wrote:
I often have situations like
will protobuf support shared_ptr stuff.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Kevin Regan kevin@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Giving this a bump. This might also be considered a feature request (the
ability to temporarily assign a string value to a protocol buffer during
serialization, rather
This is how I handle the same issue. This would be similar to most
multi-threaded daemons taking client input. The manager reads the message
type and passes the socket/stream to a handling thread.
On Monday, July 8, 2013 10:59:12 AM UTC-7, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Unfortunately it's not
on Ubuntu
12.04) that expects the protobuf library and JsonCpp
(http://jsoncpp.sourceforge.net/) to be installed in /usr/local.
Please let me know what you think and if you have any suggestions.
Thanks,
Kevin Regan
k.re...@emc.com
kevin.d.re...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because
