Comment #45 on issue 57 by ankit.ga...@gmail.com: null values should be
treated as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
To have null in proto buffer, can workaround me something like wrapping the
value and type of value(null/non-null) into a message and then send
Comment #46 on issue 57 by ag.coolg...@gmail.com: null values should be
treated as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
To have null in proto buffer, can workaround be something like wrapping the
value and type of value(null/non-null) into a message and then send
Comment #44 on issue 57 by osu...@gmail.com: null values should be treated
as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
Interesting thread. I love protobuf. I think the foundation of the
disagreement is in comment #33:
[We] do not like the idea of treating null and not
Comment #41 on issue 57 by mikerobe...@gmail.com: null values should be
treated as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
Seems to me there is another way that large amounts of boilerplate code can
be reduced - I've just documented it on my blog:
Comment #43 on issue 57 by limpbizkit: null values should be treated as no
value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
For what it's worth, Wire is an alternate implementation of protocol
buffers for Java. It uses null for absent.
Comment #38 on issue 57 by christophedehlinger: null values should be
treated as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
Kenton,
I'm in the process of migrating from JSON to Protobuf, and I must say I was
very
surprised and disappointed when I came across this
Comment #39 on issue 57 by christophedehlinger: null values should be
treated as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
D'oh ! The last block of code should read:
ProtoPerson.Builder builder = ProtoPerson.Builder.newBuilder();
String eFirstName =
Updates:
Owner: ken...@google.com
Comment #40 on issue 57 by ken...@google.com: null values should be treated
as no value
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57
OK, look: The vast majority of the people I talk to about this agree that
the
current behavior is
