On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Kenton Varda wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Dave Wolfe wrote:
>
>>
>> FYI, it looks like a few new functions are missing __declspec()
>> decorators. I had to apply the trivial patch below in order to
>> build a DLL version of protobuf under Windows. (
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Dave Wolfe wrote:
>
> FYI, it looks like a few new functions are missing __declspec()
> decorators. I had to apply the trivial patch below in order to
> build a DLL version of protobuf under Windows. (This applies to
> both 2.0.3 and the current trunk...)
Ouch,
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Chris wrote:
> There is a small type on the web page about the custom options:
>
> optional int32 foo = 1 [(my_field_option = 4.5)];
>>
> should be
>
>> optional int32 foo = 1 [(my_field_option) = 4.5];
>>
>
Thanks, I'll fix this.
--~--~-~--~~-
FYI, it looks like a few new functions are missing __declspec()
decorators. I had to apply the trivial patch below in order to
build a DLL version of protobuf under Windows. (This applies to
both 2.0.3 and the current trunk...)
--
Index: src/google/protobuf/repeated_field.h
===
There is a small type on the web page about the custom options:
> optional int32 foo = 1 [(my_field_option = 4.5)];
should be
> optional int32 foo = 1 [(my_field_option) = 4.5];
Cheers,
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
I have documented custom options:
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/proto.html#options
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Kenton Varda wrote:
> Yes, thanks for reminding me. There still isn't any documentation on this
> feature, even inside Google. :( I will try to write it this
Yes, thanks for reminding me. There still isn't any documentation on this
feature, even inside Google. :( I will try to write it this week.
(Sorry, it all comes down to me having too much work to do...)
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:44 PM, codeazure wrote:
>
> The language guide in the documentat
The language guide in the documentation still doesn't describe Field
Options. I can see some references to them in some of the language
specific sections (Java, Python), but nothing telling us how to use
this feature either in fields or enums.
With this and other changes, it's really helpful for
On Dec 5, 6:48 pm, Kenton Varda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list
> Hopefully less buggy than last time. :)
Congrats :)
> protoc
> * Fixed bug where .proto files which use custom options but don't actually
> define them (i.e. they import anot
