[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-302) Messenger does not verify the hostname in the peer's SSL certificate.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13813952#comment-13813952 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-302: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-401) Ordering issue prevents credit drain from working properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13814034#comment-13814034 ] Ted Ross commented on PROTON-401: - If there is a way for the Engine user to determine the

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PROTON-401) Ordering issue prevents credit drain from working properly

You should be able to use pn_link_get_drain(sender) to determine the drain mode of a sender. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Ted Ross (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: [

Re: The implicit reply_to address

Hi, I'm scratching my head a bit to understand your scenario so I'll answer the easy question first. ;-) The address format currently used by messenger isn't part of any official spec, and the official spec will likely look a bit different. When the spec is ratified, we will have to change and

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTON-401) Ordering issue prevents credit drain from working properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Ross resolved PROTON-401. - Resolution: Fixed The problem has been solved by using the pn_link_get_drain() query to determine when

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-447) Ruby types returned from Data should carry their AMQP type

Darryl L. Pierce created PROTON-447: --- Summary: Ruby types returned from Data should carry their AMQP type Key: PROTON-447 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-447 Project: Qpid Proton

Re: The implicit reply_to address

On 5. 11. 13 18:58, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi, I'm scratching my head a bit to understand your scenario so I'll answer the easy question first. ;-) The address format currently used by messenger isn't part of any official spec, and the official spec will likely look a bit different. When the