On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
> Sorry for top-posting. I'm trying to understand the consequences of what
> you are proposing.
>
> First, as I understand it, there are two separate test suites in the
> proton tree: one written in Java - containing 19 tests as you point out -
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:49:59AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>
> > I would love to hear thoughts and/or alternative ideas on how to improve
> > things. I would like to start addressing this early in the 0.7
> development
> > cycle.
>
Sorry for top-posting. I'm trying to understand the consequences of what you
are proposing.
First, as I understand it, there are two separate test suites in the proton
tree: one written in Java - containing 19 tests as you point out - and a much
larger one written in python. Each test suite e
Hi Everyone,
I've put out an RC3 with fixes to the issues people have noted so far with
RC2. You can find the source tarballs here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.6rc3/
The java binaries are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-003/
I've a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13853095#comment-13853095
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-420:
Commit 15
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darryl L. Pierce resolved PROTON-482.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.6
> Ruby bindings install to vendorarchdir rath
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13853013#comment-13853013
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-482:
Commit 15
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darryl L. Pierce updated PROTON-482:
Description: The vendorarchdir is the proper location on Ruby (1.8.7+) for
platform specifi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darryl L. Pierce updated PROTON-482:
Summary: Ruby bindings install to vendorarchdir rather than vendorlibdir
(was: Ruby bindin
Darryl L. Pierce created PROTON-482:
---
Summary: Ruby bindings install to sitearchdir rather than
sitelibdir
Key: PROTON-482
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-482
Project: Qpid Proton
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:49:59AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> I would love to hear thoughts and/or alternative ideas on how to improve
> things. I would like to start addressing this early in the 0.7 development
> cycle.
In a similar way, I'm trying to keep our Ruby and Perl bindings in
pa
Hi Everyone,
I've been struggling with some of the cross language maintenance aspects of
proton for a while, and I believe we need to take some steps to improve the
situation. I'm one of a tiny number of people (two possibly) who regularly
commit changes to both the Java and C codebase and attempt
Yes, it's fixed on trunk. Thanks!
-Ted
On 12/19/2013 05:52 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I believe I've fixed this on trunk. Let me know if you still see the
problem there.
--Rafael
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Ted Ross wrote:
Digging further into this, I see that Messenger is providin
Sounds great, thanks Rafael - that one had been annoying us :).
Cheers,
Frank
- Original Message -
From: Rafael Schloming [mailto:r...@alum.mit.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:58 AM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Cc: us...@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proton 0.6 RC2
On Wed, Dec
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Frank Quinn wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Could we get PROTON-420 in there too? I attached a patch to the ticket
> which fixes, it's just for compiler warning prevention when compiling
> against proton with strict flags.
>
I have applied a modified version of the PROTO
I believe I've fixed this on trunk. Let me know if you still see the
problem there.
--Rafael
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Ted Ross wrote:
> Digging further into this, I see that Messenger is providing the
> subscription and the address before the dynamic-attach handshake is
> completed. I
16 matches
Mail list logo