[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14532237#comment-14532237
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-881:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14532238#comment-14532238
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-877:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14532239#comment-14532239
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-881:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14532236#comment-14532236
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-881:
Commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/30
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14532240#comment-14532240
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-877:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 14:03 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
We seem to have reached consensus here, but I haven't seen any commits on
this. We should probably fix this before 0.10 so we don't end up putting
out a new API and then deprecating it in the next release. Is anyone
actually working on
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Alan Conway acon...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
The recent landing of the Go changes make me think that we should be more
explicit about our development process with respect to new language
bindings (or possibly in general). There are two
I believe where we ended up was standardizing on a single snprintf-style
signature for all encode functions, i.e.:
// always returns encoded size, never overwrites limit, pass in NULL, 0
to compute size in advance
// returns 0 if there was an actual error of some sort, e.g. xxx_t
cannot
- Original Message -
The recent landing of the Go changes make me think that we should be more
explicit about our development process with respect to new language
bindings (or possibly in general). There are two problems I would like to
address.
First, a bunch of code just landed
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 11:09 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 23:42 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
...
Apparently these are posix functions and are not included in c99. Using
the proton equivalents in util.h works. Let me know if you want me to
commit that.
Gah, sorry I
Hi folks,
Our quarterly report to the board is due by Wed 13th. I have written
an initial draft which you can find below. Let me know if you have any
additions/changes before I submit it on Monday.
Robbie
===
Apache Qpid is a project focused on creating software based on the
Advanced
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/29#discussion_r29843571
--- Diff:
proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/engine/impl/EventImpl.java ---
@@ -157,12 +165,51 @@ public void dispatch(Handler handler)
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:29 AM, gemmellr g...@git.apache.org wrote:
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/29#discussion_r29843571
--- Diff:
proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/engine/impl/EventImpl.java ---
I've been working on this codebase since the beginning of the year. The
two branches [1, 2] in my git repo represent the low-level engine APIs
and the higher-level reactive APIs, respectively.
I'm still working through the set of example apps for the reactive APIs,
but at this point I feel this
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote:
I've been working on this codebase since the beginning of the year. The
two branches [1, 2] in my git repo represent the low-level engine APIs
and the higher-level reactive APIs, respectively.
I'm still working
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14532690#comment-14532690
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-865:
Commit
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:32:33AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:57:49AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 23:42 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
...
Apparently these are posix functions and are not included in c99. Using
the proton equivalents in util.h works. Let me know if you want me to
commit that.
Gah, sorry I should have spotted that myself earlier.
I will fix it - I think
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:57:49AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
To help with this, two additional callback APIs were added to the Proton
libraries: pn_record_set_callback and pn_record_has_callback. These two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14532849#comment-14532849
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-881:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14532960#comment-14532960
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-697:
---
Github user gemmellr commented on the pull
Github user gemmellr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/2#issuecomment-99931684
The JIRA is marked complete, but none of the commits included the message
to auto close the PR. Can you close it @cliffjansen?
---
If your project is set up for it,
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:32:33AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:57:49AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cliff Jansen closed PROTON-697.
---
SChannel SSL/TLS support for Proton-c on Windows
25 matches
Mail list logo
