[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1044) Create/Delete of BlockingConnection leaks file descriptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106485#comment-15106485 ] Gordon Sim commented on PROTON-1044: Thanks for confirming Jeff! > Create/Delete of

Re: Please update appveyor.yml version [Was: Proton 0.12.0 release update - Alpha is available]

Can I suggest a more basic change of simply removing the release version from the Appveyor job id? None of the other CI jobs have that, and given it has been wrong for around 5 months it doesn't seem particularly noted by most folks. The branch name could still be there as it is now, which in

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: Event tidying

GitHub user astitcher opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/63 Event tidying Pull request for comment by @alanconway & @cliffjansen These changes passed the tests on travis and appveyor for me, so hopefully they work. You can merge this pull

Re: Android client / ServiceBus

Thanks a lot for your input Robbie Robbie Gemmell wrote > I'm afraid I don't have any real experience of using Event Hubs, > Android, Messenger, or combinations thereof, instead mostly > using/developing proton-j as a pure protocol engine used within other > components such as the JMS client

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1096) [proton-j] enable set/get of MessageFormat on the Delivery being sent/received

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15107378#comment-15107378 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-1096: Github user tourili commented on the pull request:

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: Event tidying

Github user alanconway commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/63#issuecomment-173013404 Ship it! Neater and cleaner, I rebased my connection_engine branch on it, the only changes I had to make were simpifications to the dispatch loop, everything

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: [PROTON-1096]: expose seting MessageForm...

Github user tourili commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/53#issuecomment-172977081 Thank you. Sorry for hijacking this thread. I am answering you on the mailing list... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

Re: Request delay of proton 0.12 beta.

Okay, not a problem. I'll adjust the schedule on the release page. Justin On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Alan Conway wrote: > We are working hard on the C++ binding, which will include a > "connection_engine" as an alternative to the reactor, I'll post another > note on

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: [PROTON-1096]: expose seting MessageForm...

Github user gemmellr commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/53#issuecomment-172958834 I have replied to your thread on the mailing list, please keep general discussion there. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1096) [proton-j] enable set/get of MessageFormat on the Delivery being sent/received

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15107102#comment-15107102 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-1096: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1096) [proton-j] enable set/get of MessageFormat on the Delivery being sent/received

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15107119#comment-15107119 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-1096: Github user gemmellr commented on the pull request:

[jira] [Reopened] (PROTON-1096) [proton-j] enable set/get of MessageFormat on the Delivery being sent/received

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell reopened PROTON-1096: Reopening. While I was expanding the changes proposed in the PR to cover received Deliveries

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTON-1096) [proton-j] enable set/get of MessageFormat on the Delivery being sent/received

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell resolved PROTON-1096. Resolution: Fixed > [proton-j] enable set/get of MessageFormat on the Delivery being >

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: [PROTON-1096]: expose seting MessageForm...

Github user tourili commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/53#issuecomment-172944770 Hi I have a question about the proton-j. Is proton-j a valid option for developing **android client** to connect to **azure service bus**. Please if any one can

Re: Android client / ServiceBus

On 19 January 2016 at 15:15, tourili wrote: > Any hint from some experimented with this topic PLEASE > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Android-client-ServiceBus-tp7636619p7636821.html > Sent from the Apache Qpid Proton mailing

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: [PROTON-1096]: expose seting MessageForm...

Github user gemmellr commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/53#issuecomment-172938973 Hi Sreeram, As you might have already seen from the JIRA update or commit just now, I have made a further update here to go back to using an int to carry

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1096) [proton-j] enable set/get of MessageFormat on the Delivery being sent/received

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15107251#comment-15107251 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-1096: Github user gemmellr commented on the pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1096) [proton-j] enable set/get of MessageFormat on the Delivery being sent/received

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15107785#comment-15107785 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-1096: Github user SreeramGarlapati commented on the pull

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PROTON-515) Port to OpenVMS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15108149#comment-15108149 ] Tomas Soltys edited comment on PROTON-515 at 1/20/16 7:20 AM: -- Removed not

[jira] [Updated] (PROTON-515) Port to OpenVMS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomas Soltys updated PROTON-515: Attachment: object.h.patch io.c.patch Additional patches required for proton to be

[jira] [Updated] (PROTON-515) Port to OpenVMS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomas Soltys updated PROTON-515: Attachment: (was: codec.c.patch) > Port to OpenVMS > --- > > Key:

[jira] [Updated] (PROTON-515) Port to OpenVMS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomas Soltys updated PROTON-515: Attachment: (was: message.c.patch) > Port to OpenVMS > --- > > Key:

[jira] [Updated] (PROTON-515) Port to OpenVMS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomas Soltys updated PROTON-515: Attachment: (was: driver.c.patch) > Port to OpenVMS > --- > > Key:

[jira] [Updated] (PROTON-515) Port to OpenVMS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomas Soltys updated PROTON-515: Affects Version/s: (was: 0.6) 0.11.1 > Port to OpenVMS > ---

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1088) Add convenience functions to obtain the client certificate fingerprint, subject subfields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106717#comment-15106717 ] Justin Ross commented on PROTON-1088: - I don't think the patch on this one is ready. The names of

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1088) Add convenience functions to obtain the client certificate fingerprint, subject subfields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106762#comment-15106762 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-1088: - Commit

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: PROTON-1088 - Additional fix, added scha...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/62 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-1088) Add convenience functions to obtain the client certificate fingerprint, subject subfields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106763#comment-15106763 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-1088: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

Re: Android client / ServiceBus

Any hint from some experimented with this topic PLEASE -- View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Android-client-ServiceBus-tp7636619p7636821.html Sent from the Apache Qpid Proton mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: [PROTON-1096]: expose seting MessageForm...

Github user SreeramGarlapati commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/53#issuecomment-173046439 Not a problem Robbie! Will merge this soon. Thanks for the Update! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

Re: Please update appveyor.yml version [Was: Proton 0.12.0 release update - Alpha is available]

On 19 January 2016 at 15:25, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 10:39 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >> Can I suggest a more basic change of simply removing the release >> version from the Appveyor job id? >> >> None of the other CI jobs have that, and given it has