On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 05:27:14PM -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> >> Darryl, you could use %typemap(freearg) to ensure the respective free
> >> function is called to cleanup.
> >> How it gets called is also automatically handled by swig based on the
> >> host language.
> >>
> >
> > Maybe I'm miss
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Rafael Schloming
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Rajith Attapattu >wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Rafael Schloming
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Darr
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Rafael Schloming
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Darryl L. Pierce > >wrote:
>> > methods on Messenger and Message objects and b
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Rafael Schloming
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Darryl L. Pierce >wrote:
> > methods on Messenger and Message objects and by tying pn_messenger_free
> and
> > pn_message_free into the respe
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:46:00PM -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > methods on Messenger and Message objects and by tying pn_messenger_free and
> > pn_message_free into the res
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> methods on Messenger and Message objects and by tying pn_messenger_free and
> pn_message_free into the respective destructors, we could make things a
> whole lot safer, e.g. avoid
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:36:35PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > So my general thought is that we should focus on the messenger stuff
> first
> > for high level languages like Ruby. The main reason being that the lower
> > level inter
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:36:35PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> So my general thought is that we should focus on the messenger stuff first
> for high level languages like Ruby. The main reason being that the lower
> level interfaces might want to get tweaked a bit more for performance
> reasons
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> I've been working the past few weeks on providing a stable API layer in
> Ruby on top of the swig bindings. I've made a few decisions in the
> design and want to now float them out here to get feedback.
>
> You can take a look at the WIP i
I've been working the past few weeks on providing a stable API layer in
Ruby on top of the swig bindings. I've made a few decisions in the
design and want to now float them out here to get feedback.
You can take a look at the WIP in my Github repo [1].
NAMESPACES
==
The APIs all live with
10 matches
Mail list logo