On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> On 20 December 2013 19:49, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Fraser Adams <
> > fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > I've been following this thread with interest and I guess that Rob's
> > > comment
>
On 20 December 2013 19:49, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Fraser Adams <
> fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > I've been following this thread with interest and I guess that Rob's
> > comment
> >
> >
> > "
> >
> > However I think that would require us to be
>
So far there has been some good discussion on this thread. I can certainly
appreciate the frustration that has been expressed, specifically around
under defined APIs, and confusion regarding the various components of
proton. I believe there are steps we can take to improve both of those
situations.
On 12/20/2013 01:49 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Fraser Adams <
fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
I've been following this thread with interest and I guess that Rob's
comment
"
However I think that would require us to be
organised differently with a reco
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Fraser Adams <
fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> I've been following this thread with interest and I guess that Rob's
> comment
>
>
> "
>
> However I think that would require us to be
> organised differently with a recognition that the Engine and Messenger a
I've been following this thread with interest and I guess that Rob's comment
"
However I think that would require us to be
organised differently with a recognition that the Engine and Messenger are
conceptually separate (with Messenger depending on the Engine API, and
having no more authority ov
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:07:38PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:49:59AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> >
> > > I would love to hear thoughts and/or alternative ideas on how to improve
> > > things. I woul
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> Since I have pretty much given up on trying to work on proton, I'm not sure
> that my opinion counts for much anymore... however I suppose I'm a little
> curious how the JNI binding differs in "extra work" vs. PHP or Ruby or
> such. Similarly w
Since I have pretty much given up on trying to work on proton, I'm not sure
that my opinion counts for much anymore... however I suppose I'm a little
curious how the JNI binding differs in "extra work" vs. PHP or Ruby or
such. Similarly why the API distinction is "hasty" when again it should
(modul
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
> Sorry for top-posting. I'm trying to understand the consequences of what
> you are proposing.
>
> First, as I understand it, there are two separate test suites in the
> proton tree: one written in Java - containing 19 tests as you point out -
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:49:59AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>
> > I would love to hear thoughts and/or alternative ideas on how to improve
> > things. I would like to start addressing this early in the 0.7
> development
> > cycle.
>
e -
> From: "Rafael Schloming"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 8:49:59 AM
> Subject: improving cross language maintainability
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've been struggling with some of the cross language maintenance aspects o
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:49:59AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> I would love to hear thoughts and/or alternative ideas on how to improve
> things. I would like to start addressing this early in the 0.7 development
> cycle.
In a similar way, I'm trying to keep our Ruby and Perl bindings in
pa
Hi Everyone,
I've been struggling with some of the cross language maintenance aspects of
proton for a while, and I believe we need to take some steps to improve the
situation. I'm one of a tiny number of people (two possibly) who regularly
commit changes to both the Java and C codebase and attempt
14 matches
Mail list logo
