On 4 April 2016 at 16:03, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> There were 13 binding +1 votes received and another 2 from users, with
> no other votes received. The vote has passed.
>
> I'll chat with infra in the days ahead about how things proceed.
>
> Robbie
I've discussed this with infra.
Whilst they wou
There were 13 binding +1 votes received and another 2 from users, with
no other votes received. The vote has passed.
I'll chat with infra in the days ahead about how things proceed.
Robbie
+1
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 11:25 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Many moons ago, a seperate mailing list was established for Proton,
> back when it was purely a protocol engine other components would use.
> Its scope has since expanded beyond that and the separate mailing
> list
> h
+1
On 03/30/2016 06:25 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hello folks,
Many moons ago, a seperate mailing list was established for Proton,
back when it was purely a protocol engine other components would use.
Its scope has since expanded beyond that and the separate mailing list
has I feel been an incre
+1
- Original Message -
> From: "Robbie Gemmell"
> To: us...@qpid.apache.org, proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 6:25:34 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] merge the proton mailing list into the users/dev lists
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Many moon
+1
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Chuck Rolke wrote:
> +1
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Robbie Gemmell"
> > To: us...@qpid.apache.org, proton@qpid.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 6:25:34 AM
> > Subject: [VOTE] merge
+1
- Original Message -
> From: "Robbie Gemmell"
> To: us...@qpid.apache.org, proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 6:25:34 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] merge the proton mailing list into the users/dev lists
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Many moon
+1
On 30/03/16 11:25, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hello folks,
Many moons ago, a seperate mailing list was established for Proton,
back when it was purely a protocol engine other components would use.
Its scope has since expanded beyond that and the separate mailing list
has I feel been an increasing
Agreed, we can include something to that effect on the website
alongside the list details.
Robbie
(who very nearly missed out a list after initially forgetting to
reply-all, having just called that out earlier...)
On 30 March 2016 at 11:30, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> +1
>
> Additionally it might make
+1
And a separate +1 to Rob's suggestion.
-Ted
On 03/30/2016 06:30 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
+1
Additionally it might make sense to write a paragraph somewhere on
suggestions for best practice on mailing the list (like including
components / languages in use in the title or the body of the e-mai
+1
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Kai wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:25 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > Many moons ago, a seperate mailing list was established for Proton,
> > back when it was purely a protocol engine other components would use.
> > Its scope h
+1
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:25 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Many moons ago, a seperate mailing list was established for Proton,
> back when it was purely a protocol engine other components would use.
> Its scope has since expanded beyond that and the separate mailing list
> has
+1
+1
On 30/03/16 13:30, "Rob Godfrey" wrote:
>+1
>
>Additionally it might make sense to write a paragraph somewhere on
>suggestions for best practice on mailing the list (like including
>components / languages in use in the title or the body of the e-mail :-) ).
>
>-- Rob
>
>On 30 March 2016 at
+1
Additionally it might make sense to write a paragraph somewhere on
suggestions for best practice on mailing the list (like including
components / languages in use in the title or the body of the e-mail :-) ).
-- Rob
On 30 March 2016 at 11:25, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Many mo
On 30 March 2016 at 11:25, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Many moons ago, a seperate mailing list was established for Proton,
> back when it was purely a protocol engine other components would use.
> Its scope has since expanded beyond that and the separate mailing list
> has I feel been
Hello folks,
Many moons ago, a seperate mailing list was established for Proton,
back when it was purely a protocol engine other components would use.
Its scope has since expanded beyond that and the separate mailing list
has I feel been an increasing source of confusion and hassle of late
more th
17 matches
Mail list logo
