l Message -
> From: "Andrew Stitcher"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org, "Qpid Developers"
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 10:04:40 AM
> Subject: Re: Dropping proton-dump; Moving to newer minimum CMake version
>
> Well I left it 3 days, heard no objectio
Well I left it 3 days, heard no objections so I will remove proton-dump
and up the minimum version of cmake to 2.8.7.
Andrew
+1 from me
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 17:36 -0500, Ken Giusti wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Andrew Stitcher"
> > To: "proton" , "Qpid Developers" > apache.org>
> > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 5:03:40 PM
> > Subject: Dropping proton-dump; Moving to newer minimum CMake
> > vers
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 17:36 -0500, Ken Giusti wrote:
> ...
> In general +1. What version does Windows use?
In general Windows builds will use whatever you install on them (as
CMake isn't packaged with Windows in anyway).
Specifically the version packaged by chocolatey (http://chocolatey.org)
is
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 17:16 -0500, Chuck Rolke wrote:
> ..
>
> I use a minimum CMake of 2.8.11 on my windows systems.
Thanks for the info - FWIW I'd upgrade to atleast 2.8.12 If I were you
(it's the last 2.8 version before they jumped to 3.x)
Andrew
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Stitcher"
> To: "proton" , "Qpid Developers"
>
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 5:03:40 PM
> Subject: Dropping proton-dump; Moving to newer minimum CMake version
>
> I've been doing some build tree maintenance in Proton and a couple of
> issues ha
+1, +1.
I'm ok with both these changes.
Proton dump was handy on some occasions when new clients were sending bogus
frames that got confused by Wireshark. Normally Wireshark is fine but
proton-dump is a good authority. It was probably more useful in proton's
infancy and is unused today.
I use
