On 9/5/07, jdalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In some cases, other functions build off of these base functions and
the slow down can eventually grow For example using large arrays
or calling a method 1000+ times that make heavy use of the Enumerable
helpers is slow compared using a
On 9/5/07, Nicolás Sanguinetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, I want only certain rows of a table to have some methods
available, and would love to do something like
Element.addMethods(tr.combatant, Combatant.Methods);
The extension mechanism is already quite complex because of the
Thanks. Must have searched here a little more. ) (but there's still no
solution in v1.6.0_rc0 )
On Sep 5, 6:19 am, jdalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Andrew,
I brought this up in May
07:http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/browse_thread/thread/55...
Mislav Marohnić and Tobias
Am 05.09.2007 um 04:11 schrieb jdalton:
Other rant: Also I don't see a valid argument for not using opening
and closing conditional brackets { }...
Its a few brackets here and there that would make the code soo much
less cryptic. I think that gzipping and this would still keep the
filesize
Hi Thomas,
I concede the $w() point.
I did not know that using brackets is slower.
How much so and are there benchmarks for that claim?
I agree that:
If(blah) return;
Is fine, I do little stuff like that in my code, but lets use a real
example:
http://pastie.caboo.se/private/y6hmgibpglrlwlknms
Ultimately, this and several other topics come down to the fact that
Prototype is the JavaScript library for Ruby programmers. This isn't
bad, it's just something that non-Ruby coders like myself have to come
to grips with. Prototype prefers method names like uniq rather than
unique, for
On Sep 5, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Thomas Fuchs wrote:
Am 05.09.2007 um 16:22 schrieb jdalton:
I did not know that using brackets is slower.
No, that's just a claim. :)
I'd welcome benchmarks for this (i've the feeling it's not really
measurable, but you never know...).
Thomas, brackets once
I just saw a post on this Opera bug.
I don't suggest a fix or anything just wanted to let you know:
http://my.opera.com/nicomen/blog/2007/07/08/domcontentloaded-gotcha-with-external-stylesheets
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On 9/5/07, jdalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just saw a post on this Opera bug.
I don't suggest a fix or anything just wanted to let you know:
http://my.opera.com/nicomen/blog/2007/07/08/domcontentloaded-gotcha-with-external-stylesheets
DOMContentLoaded should be standardized. Is there
That very blog post points to HTML5 work on the issue. If you're
brave, Mislav, you could ask for a spec clarification on the HTML5
mailing list.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Sep 5, 10:20 am, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 9/5/07, jdalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just saw a post on
10 matches
Mail list logo
