Бесплатная консультация врача онлайн. Медицинская консультация по
телефону - заполните форму, врач Вам перезвонит в ближайшее время.
Задать вопрос врачу очень просто - заполните форму ниже. Бесплатная
консультация врача онлайн http://shopbody.ru/kons/
Женская консультация начал ведение консультаци
from:http://www.googlemother.com/wpblogs/?p=7281
Prototype WTP 0.2 released,this release for Prototype 1.6.0
Prototype
Prototype is a JavaScript Framework that aims to ease development of
dynamic web applications. Featuring a unique, easy-to-use toolkit for
class-driven development and the nicest
Prototype WTP 0.2 released,this release for Prototype 1.6.0
Prototype
Prototype is a JavaScript Framework that aims to ease development of
dynamic web applications. Featuring a unique, easy-to-use toolkit for
class-driven development and the nicest Ajax library around, Prototype
is quickly becomi
On Oct 7, 11:17 am, Tom Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How 'bout POLS?
It's a bit hard to tell what "intuitive" definition of "number" is in
a weakly typed language. According to ECMA-262 specs, an object
created with `new Number` is not of type number but rather of type
object. Besides so
The gzipped version hosted on Google's servers is 28K; JDD's packed-
and-gzipped version in ProtoPack is 24K. I don't think it's worth the
trouble.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Oct 7, 12:40 pm, Shadow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be great if core team can add a minified version to the google
> api,
I would be great if core team can add a minified version to the google
api, I think having both versions would be great (having a non
minified version reduced the ySlow grade btw) but if we could have
something like:
http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/prototype/1.6.0.2/min/prototype.js
(notice
Ok, I have updated ProtoPack to v2.20.
This update includes Prototype 1.6.0.3 and a customized version of
Dean Edwards' Packer 3 that supports Prototype 1.6+ use of $super
variable.
Please read the readme_first.txt and the changelog.txt.
protopack_v2.20.zip
http://code.google.com/p/protosafe/down
How 'bout POLS?
TAG
On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:05 AM, kangax wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> I have already replied to you on Lighthouse, but, out of curiosity,
> why do you need `isNumber` to "work" with objects? What's the usecase
> and why plan type-conversion (before calling isNumber) doesn't satisfy
> you?
On Oct 7, 5:21 am, atrepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with Object.isNumber() because it test only for type
> number and not for the object Number.
>
> http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/tickets/37...
>
> With Webkit (5525.20.1) and Protototype 1.6.
$(document.body).insert( new Element('div',
{id:'ie_offset_parent_bug'}).setStyle('position:relative'));
this.assertEqual('BODY',
$('ie_offset_parent_bug').getOffsetParent().tagName.toUpperCase());
fails! returns 'HTML'
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Rod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The fix
The fix is relatively straight-forward and is marked as being resolved
for 1.6.0.3 but the problem persists in the latest code and there is
no evidence of anything having been done.
See a lighthouse version of the same issue which is closed:
http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/ticket
Sorry It is not :
if (Object.isNumber(values))
return results.push(toQueryPair(key, values.toString()));
but
if (Object.isNumber(values))
results.push(toQueryPair(key, values.toString()));
On 7 oct, 11:21, atrepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bug 2
http://prototype.lighthou
Hi,
I have a problem with Object.isNumber() because it test only for type
number and not for the object Number.
http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/tickets/375-objectisnumber-is-false-for-number-object
With Webkit (5525.20.1) and Protototype 1.6.0.3 :
var a = new Number(
I got a the same error described in the following ticket when I added
a DOCTYPE to the HTML
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/11473
The patch is dated 6months old, so I'm not sure if it also applies to
the recent protoype 1.6.0.3.
please advise
/mona
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
14 matches
Mail list logo