Hi,
I'm trying to get my graphing library (RGraph) working in conjunction
with Prototype and to start I'm wondering if Prototype uses a
strictmode?
Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype:
Hi Simon,
Funny you should be doing that, I was just looking at Template the
other day and thinking I might suggest a rewrite for 1.7 or 2.0.
When I did a similar thing in Java a few years back, I made it heavy
on the initialization and light on evaluation -- since the point of a
template is to
Hi all,
Weighing in... First off, love the idea of Function#repeat.
Wonderfully simple and expressive.
As Tobie says, the goals when doing it should be to handle all of the
issues PE already handles, to reuse existing code, and to be
consistent with other API functions.
Some notes:
1. I'd
Samuel,
Sorry for the Simon error in my last post. Years ago I knew a guy
named Simon Lebeau, clearly it got ingrained my brain.
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 27, 10:35 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
Funny you should be doing that, I was just looking at Template the
other
Hi Richard,
This may be a topic better discussed in the general discussion group
[1]. This group is for Prototype core development discussion.
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 10:12 am, Richard Heyes
My Template implementation does it too =)
In Template contrsuctor template string splits into parts and arrays
of properties.
Example:
a#{x.y}/a - [a,[x,y],/a]
=)
I use String#split for this. ( so i use fixed cross-browser split )
On Aug 27, 4:19 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com
Hi.
I've just updated my local copy of prototype from git.
All looks OK.
Rebuilt prototype.js all fine.
Run rake doc and now getting an error ...
(in D:/Personal Files/Downloads/Software/Programming/Javascript/prototype)
You'll need PDoc to generate the documentation. Just run:
$ git
Hi Richard,
Yeah, Tobie updated PDoc to use rdiscount instead of BlueCloth. If
you install the rdiscount gem (gem install rdiscount), it should work
-- unless you're using Windows.
But! Tobie's going to update PDoc to use something else, probably
maruku, rather than rdiscount. Not sure of
Hello,
I need to change content of a dom element on select a option.
I tried to handel it like this:
script type=text/javascript
document.observe(dom:loaded, function() {
$('#englisch').onfocus = function() {
$('div').replace('pThis is English/p');
}
});
/script
select
Hi,
This group is for discussion of development of the Prototype library,
not usage of it. Please see this group[1].
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 1:01 pm, clicforw...@googlemail.com
Hi,
You probably want something more like this:
script type=text/javascript
document.observe(dom:loaded, function() {
$('englisch').observe('change', function() {
$('div').replace('pThis is English/p');
}
});
/script
The first problem is that you used # which is unneeded because $
@Allen, Alexander, Rainer,
Again, can we please pick this up over on the appropriate group[1]?
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
Cheers,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 2:50 pm, Rainer Weber clicforw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
thanks for
Hi all,
See this fairly half-baked ticket in Lighthouse for context:
https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/tickets/773
Responding to the proof-of-concept commit, Kangax asked whether * was
used for this sort of thing anywhere else, and in a private email
Tobie flagged up how this in
Hello,
thanks for this. But it dos nothing.
I tried:
document.observe(dom:loaded, function() {
$('german').observe('change', function() {
$('language1').replace('this is the german text');
});
});
I want to change the text of a headline from englisch to german when i
choose german in
@TJ...
Your goals sound about right. Implicit in there, I think, is make it easy
to deprecate PE at some later date. At least, that's how I read it. :)
Re: #2 - Why not just use bind() to provide context? I've never been a fan
of overloading arguments with multiple interpretations. 'Gets
Hey Robert,
It's true, I was thinking in terms of deprecating PE at some
stage... :-)
Re #2: Using #bind at least doubles the call overhead, which I'm not a
fan of generally.
...have it throw $break!
Now that is a very smart idea.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 4:13
Food for thought:
1. We would like to completely decouple native and host objects in the
LANG section for version 1.7.
`setTimeout` and `setInterval` are host objects...
2. We're planning strict ES 5 compliance of enumerables for 1.7. that
implies removing $break.
Best,
Tobie
On Aug 27,
For the record, here's my initial email which I mistakenly sent
(twice!) to
T.J. instead of to the whole list:
---
Hi, TJ.
I thought about your suggestion some more (regarding escaping
asterisk-
prefixed property names).
It's feels very much too application specific to me.
Also, it couples
*blech* to ES5's enumerable stuff not having $break or similar
functionality. I've just read the forEach section of the draft spec
from a while back, and I'm not seeing a discussion of exception
handling. I haven't delved deep, though -- do you know offhand how
exceptions in the callback
Exceptions aren't eaten.
Good, so a $break-like mechanism is possible then, just moved out a
level.
-- T.J.
On Aug 27, 10:49 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
*blech* to ES5's enumerable stuff not having $break or similar
functionality. I've just read the forEach section of
20 matches
Mail list logo
