Maybe the first thing is not to overwrite the native method, I agree
with Mislav, to extend the NodeList.prototype maybe is the best
choice, and overwrite in the element methods never
want that thing
On Aug 25, 12:35 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> How abo
How about as an extended element method?
On Aug 24, 7:57 am, "Mislav Marohni " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 8/24/07, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm not saying we should do that, but can't we just wrap it
> > HTMLElement.prototype too ?
>
> No, I tried :)
>
> We must go t
On 8/24/07, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm not saying we should do that, but can't we just wrap it
> HTMLElement.prototype too ?
No, I tried :)
We must go through HTMLElement, HTMLFormElement, HTMLTableElement ... each
and every one. Crazy, yeah :D
--~--~-~--~~---
I'm not saying we should do that, but can't we just wrap it
HTMLElement.prototype too ?
Tobie
On Aug 24, 6:49 am, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 8/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > ... this difference may cause some
> > bugs, so I suggest a small wr
On 8/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ... this difference may cause some
> bugs, so I suggest a small wrapper for getElementsByClassName in
> firefox3.0
This is just a wrapper for document.gEBCN, but don't forget that the method
itself is available on every node in the DOM.
The alternate syntax suggested by Ben Newman and supported by Alex is
demonstrated in these two pastes:
http://pastie.caboo.se/90313 (Ben)
http://pastie.textmate.org/90584 (Alex)
The syntax is slightly more verbose than what we have in 1.6.0, but with it
it's dead easy to have true privacy for var
Here is a Pastie link to a concrete example.
http://pastie.textmate.org/90584
Alex Arnell
PS. Sorry, I forgot to start new thread when I started these replies.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"P
