On 9/1/07, Robert Katić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I suggest this improvement for more correct OOP in Prototype.
We are still discussing and working on subclassing syntax and feature. We
will consider this.
I've also made a patch that enhances the current inheritance system to
inherit clas
IMHO, "contentloaded" should be fired once, when the DOM of the
initial page is completely loaded and parsed by the browser.
Loading in stuff via Ajax shouldn't trigger this event.
YMMV, but you can add a global ajax responder and fire a
"fragmentloaded" (or so) custom event, and oberve that
Yes I see...
But why you don't permit to override Function.prototype properties in
user classes?
On Sep 1, 10:57 am, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/1/07, Robert Katić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I suggest this improvement for more correct OOP in Prototype.
>
> We are
I have another question about $A and similar.
Why you prefer do this
var results = [];
for (var i = 0, length = iterable.length; i < length; i++)
results.push(iterable[i]);
instead of
var length = iterable.length, results = new Array(length);
for (var i = 0; i < lengt
On 9/1/07, Thomas Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMHO, "contentloaded" should be fired once, when the DOM of the
> initial page is completely loaded and parsed by the browser.
>
> ...
>
> I think making contentloaded too magic breaks POLS.
Actually it works the other way around for me. My m
On Sep 1, 5:18 pm, "Nicolás Sanguinetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, the custom event solution seems tidy enough. What do the w3c
> specs say on xmlhttprequests and contentloaded, if anything?
They don't. Despite its name, the "DOMContentLoaded" event is not part
of any standard.
--~--
Can we have benchmarks ?
On Sep 1, 7:32 pm, Robert Katić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have another question about $A and similar.
>
> Why you prefer do this
>
>var results = [];
> for (var i = 0, length = iterable.length; i < length; i++)
> results.push(iterable[i]);
>
> inste
I wrote small profile http://pastie.textmate.org/93190 that I paste on
firebug.
This is results on my laptop:
Size: 100 Times: 1
push: 4672ms
init: 2922ms
Size: 10 Times: 1
push: 266ms
init: 594ms
Size: 4 Times: 1
push: 141ms
init: 79ms
On Sep 2, 4:31 am, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PRO
In Opera I was able to perform similar timing with much more
repetitions.
Conclusion: 'init' function is double faster then 'push' function
On Sep 2, 5:16 am, Robert Katić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote small profilehttp://pastie.textmate.org/93190that I paste on
> firebug.
>
> This is resu
