[Prototype-core] Re: Deprecation.js
Ya, I'm just trying to figure out a good way to do so as the plan is to tie it to a specific version of Prototype. Any suggestions welcomed. Best, Tobie On Feb 15, 12:58 pm, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14/02/2008, Richard Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 14/02/2008, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Thanks for the thumbs up. > > > > deprecation.js is meant to be used with prototype.js, not a subset of > > > it, so I don't think that's really an issue for now. > > > > The plan is to keep this new prototype extension up to date with the > > > changes in Prototype, so once we remove the Position object, we'll add > > > it to deprecation.js. > > > Aha. Ok. I see. I was getting ahead of the game by taking out > > Postition before its time. > > > Thanks. > > > > On Feb 14, 11:02 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > If you comment out from prototype.js the deprecated functions/classes > > > > (I take out the whole Position class for example), then deprecation.js > > > > fails due to the lack of the namespace: Position. > > > > > So, using v1.6.0.2, should Position be defined but unused and > > > > therefore be in the global namespace or should it be commented out and > > > > deprecation.js cope with its absence? > > > > > (I can't quite decide if this is a core or a spinoff issue). > > Would it be possible to add a version number/build number to the > extension please. > > -- > - > Richard Quadling > Zend Certified Engineer :http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 > "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] Re: Deprecation.js
On 14/02/2008, Richard Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14/02/2008, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Thanks for the thumbs up. > > > > deprecation.js is meant to be used with prototype.js, not a subset of > > it, so I don't think that's really an issue for now. > > > > The plan is to keep this new prototype extension up to date with the > > changes in Prototype, so once we remove the Position object, we'll add > > it to deprecation.js. > > > Aha. Ok. I see. I was getting ahead of the game by taking out > Postition before its time. > > Thanks. > > > > On Feb 14, 11:02 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > If you comment out from prototype.js the deprecated functions/classes > > > (I take out the whole Position class for example), then deprecation.js > > > fails due to the lack of the namespace: Position. > > > > > > So, using v1.6.0.2, should Position be defined but unused and > > > therefore be in the global namespace or should it be commented out and > > > deprecation.js cope with its absence? > > > > > > (I can't quite decide if this is a core or a spinoff issue). Would it be possible to add a version number/build number to the extension please. -- - Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] Re: Deprecation.js
On 14/02/2008, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > Thanks for the thumbs up. > > deprecation.js is meant to be used with prototype.js, not a subset of > it, so I don't think that's really an issue for now. > > The plan is to keep this new prototype extension up to date with the > changes in Prototype, so once we remove the Position object, we'll add > it to deprecation.js. Aha. Ok. I see. I was getting ahead of the game by taking out Postition before its time. Thanks. > On Feb 14, 11:02 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > If you comment out from prototype.js the deprecated functions/classes > > (I take out the whole Position class for example), then deprecation.js > > fails due to the lack of the namespace: Position. > > > > So, using v1.6.0.2, should Position be defined but unused and > > therefore be in the global namespace or should it be commented out and > > deprecation.js cope with its absence? > > > > (I can't quite decide if this is a core or a spinoff issue). > > > > -- > > - > > Richard Quadling > > Zend Certified Engineer :http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 > > "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" > > > > -- - Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] Re: Deprecation.js
see http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/browse_thread/thread/7778ce045f54f516/837e4cf9f57711db?hl=enͅe4cf9f57711db On Feb 14, 11:02 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > If you comment out from prototype.js the deprecated functions/classes > (I take out the whole Position class for example), then deprecation.js > fails due to the lack of the namespace: Position. > > So, using v1.6.0.2, should Position be defined but unused and > therefore be in the global namespace or should it be commented out and > deprecation.js cope with its absence? > > (I can't quite decide if this is a core or a spinoff issue). > > -- > - > Richard Quadling > Zend Certified Engineer :http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 > "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] Re: Deprecation.js
Hi Richard, Thanks for the thumbs up. deprecation.js is meant to be used with prototype.js, not a subset of it, so I don't think that's really an issue for now. The plan is to keep this new prototype extension up to date with the changes in Prototype, so once we remove the Position object, we'll add it to deprecation.js. Best, Tobie On Feb 14, 11:02 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > If you comment out from prototype.js the deprecated functions/classes > (I take out the whole Position class for example), then deprecation.js > fails due to the lack of the namespace: Position. > > So, using v1.6.0.2, should Position be defined but unused and > therefore be in the global namespace or should it be commented out and > deprecation.js cope with its absence? > > (I can't quite decide if this is a core or a spinoff issue). > > -- > - > Richard Quadling > Zend Certified Engineer :http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 > "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
