--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
F
I use this check in a jasmine spec to ensure a newly created element
has attached events. The element is supposed to have events attached
to keydown and blur, and altough right now I'm not exactly testing
that, at least I could test that the element had attached events. If
there are better ways t
>
> In prototype 1.6.0.1 I used to use Event.cache[formElement._eventID] to
> check if an element has attached events.
>
Why do you need such check at all? If you need to remove all event
observers from element - there is #stopObserving(), if you need to remove
from element and its children -
#puzzle {
line-height: 0;
}
should be enough
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/9pbqmUhJKtUJ.
To post to this gro
>
> Is response empty in network sniffer/web inspector? Or in javascript code?
>>>
>> The response is already empty in web inspector.
>
Very bad
> You should check if it is actually written to HTTP response (maybe
>> response is already flushed).
>>
> If I return some HTML in addition to my
