Hi there,
IMHO, Ajax wouldn't help as the real timing issue is around the image load
which I don't think is predictable.
So, why don't you use a image preload mechanism such as the one I use in a
slightly different way. I display a waiting message, preload the pic and then
hide the waiting
To pass a function to setTimeout that is binded to an object of choice, to
something along these lines:
// where obj is obviously your object
var func = function() {
this.doSomething()
}.bind( this );
window.setTimeout( func, 1000 );
Function.prototype.bind is a function that's defined in
I'm sorry, I made some typos. This is correct:
// where obj is obviously your object
var func = function() {
this.doSomething()
}.bind( obj );
window.setTimeout( func, 1000 );
Daan
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 15:28, Daan Mortier daanmort...@gmail.com wrote:
To pass a function to setTimeout
On 02 Dec 2009, at 15:25, fma wrote:
But it does not work. In the _show() method, the call to
this._flashNavButtons() leads to an error (this._flashNavButtons() is
not a function). I think I understand why: when called from the
timeout mecanism, 'this' no longer exists, or does not point
