Which is more proper?
new Effect.Fade(..)
or
Effect.Fade(..)
Both work for me. I'm just wondering which one is more cross browser
compatible or runs faster.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Is there a Scriptaculous effect to spell out a word slowy:
S
SE
SEN
SENT
SENTE
SENTEN
SENTENCE
And also delete it slowly?
SENTENCE
SENTENC
SENTEN
SENTE
SENT
SEN
SE
S
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Andy Daykin wrote:
Hello, I am having some difficulties writing a class, in my code I have a
class where I need to be able to bind event listeners to values. In my code I
want the variable pointerIndex to be accessible outside of the initialize
function, but right now it is not. If I make
I have set up a relatively straight forward scenario where i have a
listener for event A. On click of A (a button), I run an ajax request
to update a div B. B was a large div, representing one of 3 panels on
a page. B had some javascript functionality (lets call this event C)
inside of it
Hi,
When you replace an element, the old element is no longer displayed
(ideally it no longer exists) and a new element is put in its place.
Any event handlers associated with the old element are not
automatically transferred to the new one.
There are a couple of ways to handle this:
1. Event
You need to re-observe the listeners
Perhaps a pastie of your code would help us help you..
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: hass dhasso...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday,
new defines an new instance of an Object / class.
Some things dont need new and some do.
It has nothing to dow tih Cross browser afaik
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: Mojito tokyot...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us
Hi Colin,
Incidentally (and not on topic for your question)
td/
is not valid in either HTML or XHTML.
It's valid XHTML for an empty table cell.
Wrong. It's a common misconception (which I had myself until
recently).
If so, it's a misconception the W3C's own validator shares.
--
Hi,
Can you post a minimal, self-contained example[1] of the problem?
[1] http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/self-contained-test-page
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Aug 19, 2:39 pm, Donnie Carvajal
Hi,
Wait! Stop the presses, are you saying IE8 has...a bug in it? ;-)
(Oh, I shouldn't be mean to Microsoft, all browsers have bugs in them,
and they seem to have made quite an effort in IE8.)
Have you reported the bug to Microsoft?
Seriously, though, thank you for doing the research to why it
Hi,
In general, the correct thing is what the docs[1] say it is. Fade,
Appear, and most others are just functions, not constructor functions,
and so new is not correct. Some other things, like Effect.Opacity
[2] (which confusingly use *exactly* the same capitalization -- don't
shoot the
Hi,
Rather than binding it, use the second parameter to map (aka collect
[1]), that's what the second param (context) is for. You'll find
that most of the Enumerable methods that take callbacks also take a
context parameter so the callback can be a method.
[1]
I have a problem:
from server I receive such JSON string (resp.responseJSON.Data)
{
Data:
{
ABC: 6,
NUI: 1,
ITM: 10
.
}
}
where elements in Data have the apropriate order
When I do $H(responseJSON.Data) - I have hash object with different
order of elements
But I need
This is a Prototype bug and will be fixed in version 1.7.
In the meantime, please use Object.toJSON(...) instead.
Best,
Tobie
On Aug 20, 10:53 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Wait! Stop the presses, are you saying IE8 has...a bug in it? ;-)
(Oh, I shouldn't be mean
Hi Buda,
you can't rely on browser internal way to store JSON. Each as its own
way.
The only thing you can do is to call a sort() function but in that
case you'll also loose original order.**
One thing I can propose is to modify data to have an numerical index
to your data so calling a sort()
hi
Im using here ie 6 and it works. but, in ie
the dom is ready only when the document is loaded so sometimes refering to
an element is impossible before the dom is loaded.
try moving the function call to the onload:
body onload=setVar('world');
div id=var/div
/body
On 8/20/09, david
Hi Milko,
which version of IE, because I test it with IE6, and it wotks.
--
david
On 18 août, 18:18, milko mi...@kretschmann.nl wrote:
Hello,
I made an ajax-routine using request and json, which works fine under
all browsers except under IE.
For the sake of illustration I made a
Or better, yet, use an array.
On Aug 20, 2:06 pm, david david.brill...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Buda,
you can't rely on browser internal way to store JSON. Each as its own
way.
The only thing you can do is to call a sort() function but in that
case you'll also loose original order.**
One
On Aug 20, 9:39 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Colin,
Incidentally (and not on topic for your question)
td/
is not valid in either HTML or XHTML.
It's valid XHTML for an empty table cell.
Wrong. It's a common misconception (which I had myself until
Hi,
I run this line :
Effect.multiple( tab, Effect.Scale);
There are no effect.
tab is an an array with two div elements.
I run this line
Effect.multiple( tab, Effect.Fade );
It's ok;
Why ?
Thanks,
Bernard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
earlier on in the month i posted on how to do some things with Ajax
requests genericaly like adding a loading message to all requests and
i got a couple of responses but not many.
I've been giving it alot of thought and i cam up with addMethods as a
way to add some things to the Ajax Class...
Tobie,
What's the issue #? I'm curious how Prototype can work around this
IE8 behavior...
Cheers,
-- T.J.
On Aug 20, 1:04 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a Prototype bug and will be fixed in version 1.7.
In the meantime, please use Object.toJSON(...) instead.
Unlikely. There is very little difference in computation effort
between generating JSON, XML, HTML or delimited text at the server.
I will have to take your word for this. I assumed it to be different.
So why put it in two places? Why turn data into say JSON just so you
can later turn it into
T.J. Crowder wrote:
Hi,
'Tis indeed very easy. Say you have a form wrapped in a div:
div id='formwrapper'form
/form/div
You can post it like so and take the result (which is presumed to be
an HTML snippet in this case) and use that to update the container:
new
Bill
You need to observe the form submit.
$('the-id-of-the-form').observe('submit',function(event) {
/// do the ajax that TJ said...
Event.stop(event); // will stop it doing its default action!
});
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From:
bill wrote:
T.J. Crowder wrote:
Hi,
'Tis indeed very easy. Say you have a form wrapped in a div:
div id='formwrapper'form
/form/div
You can post it like so and take the result (which is presumed to be
an HTML snippet in this case) and use that to update the container:
Yes if your roundtrip is slow then doing it clientside can make it
seem more responsive. There is the issue though of what happens if the
server save fails? Revert your changes? Overall using serverside
output is less troublesome, easier to code, and more robust.
On 8/20/09, drewB
Thanks, Colin, glad it was something like that.
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 20, 5:43 pm, ColinFine colin.f...@pace.com wrote:
On Aug 20, 9:39 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Colin,
Incidentally (and not on topic for your question)
td/
is not valid in either HTML
I tried the first suggestion, but the function still isn't getting called.
TJ, can you explain more, or show an example of what the context param would
look like? Should I just put the doSlide function as the 2nd parameter?
-Andy
--
From: T.J.
Jason.
How are you calling these functions ?
Are you using an a tag by any chance
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: Jason Frisvold xenopha...@gmail.com
To: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 9:17 PM
Subject:
30 matches
Mail list logo
