On 09.03.2009, at 01:44, Tobie Langel wrote:
We'll be shifting to Sizzle pretty soon, which afaik allows (or could
easily be modified to allow) both behaviours.
Maybe we can make this opt-in for an upcoming release.
That would be great, I can see both use cases. I also see that
On Mar 6, 5:30 pm, SamuelXiao foolsmart2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, David, it seems that periodicalupdater send request first,
breaking down the preview code
setting new Ajax.Request. And the object is no longer refering to the
gotopreview function.
Because the firebug console returns the
Hi all,
I have a problem using Ajax.Updater in Safari 3.2.
Whenever the response contains a large script tag (over 16k of JSON
data) it's not evaluated.
After some debugging I've find out that extractScripts doesn't find
the big script tag for some reason.
Currently I wrote a patch that just uses
Thank You guys for so much help, it saved me heaps of google time:)
I got much deeper insight how things work in js now.
This is just how ECMAScript is designed - expression on a right hand
side of an assignment is not
aware of its left hand side context. - that already became tattoo
in my
With :self I could do:
$(x).select(':self .mixedcontent').each(...);
I don't have anything against :self, but I don't see why $(x).select
( .foo) shouldn't be legal syntax.
Right now this is the shortest I came up with, and it's not as concise
as I'm used to with Prototype:
well the post you indicated was a former one. I had posted a question
about forms on Wednesday, had at least three responses by Friday and
they were gone on Saturday. POSSIBLY, I posted my question somewhere
else - some other prototype group - but I don't think so since this is
the only group I
Sorry for my unclear explanation, the following is all my JavaScript
code,
// script01.js //
obj = new Object();
obj.f1 = eventHandler;
window.onload = obj.f1;
window.onunload = function(){};
function eventHandler(){
postUpdater();
dynamicEdit();
deleteAlert();
I am trying to determine if a series of checkboxes have been changed
on the screen. They all have the same ID of CODE, and different
values. the list is dynamic based on what was passed in to build the
screen. I have also setup a hidden div to store the inital valuse of
these checkboxes with and
reply thanks that worked I had to remember to add the quotes around my
response to make it a string. I'll also keep the calulation in mind if
I have any issues, so far all math is done in external programs and
sent back as a response.
On Mar 5, 8:15 pm, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On Mar 5,
They must have unique IDs, or the page isn't valid and the code has no
chance at all of working (unless you need the current property of the
last one such).
When coding checkboxes, try this:
input type=checkbox name=box[] class=box id=box_1 value=1 /
input type=checkbox name=box[] class=box
OK, sorry
I found that I had posted to a different group on linkedin
Please forgive erroneous post - will be back for more if responses
from that group do not fix my prob...
Ben
On Mar 9, 9:07 am, Bhudda Ben benjamin.rud...@gmail.com wrote:
well the post you indicated was a former one. I
I want to create an autocompleter that uses HTML database storage.
What I'm intending to it modify Autocompleter.Local. My problem is
that I'm not sure how to fit these 2 pieces of code together:
From Autocompleter:
getUpdatedChoices: function() {
Hi
I have a rather large complicated form that changes considerably based
on database content and user interaction - therefore, I said to
myself, I need to serialize ??
The whole is I wish to serialize form elements, pass them to php
(Admin/editmylinks2.php) - which would update database
as additional info, I should mention:
there are multiple forms - tho with much different names
jQuery is also loaded which at first gave me conflicts, but
Ajax.Updater, at least, working now
the form giving me problem is itself loaded via Ajax.Updater - along
with (using eval) the script
Hi,
First of all I'm not prototype expert, rather newbie ;)
1) why do you use onsubmit=validatethis(); if you can use $
('formlinks').observe('submit',validatethis);
2) you don't have to set asynchronous:true - it's default value
3) most common is parameters: $('formlinks').serialize(true)
Hi,
I am looking to edit multiple fields simultaneously with the inplace
editor, I've only seen this accomplished on Basecamp so far and I'm
not entirely sure how's its done. Have spent a good hour Googling for
a tutorial on it, but can't find anything. Anyone know of one or is
anyone able to
My first thought was gmail scenario as well :)
Even google use just confirmation dialog...I've never seen any other
type - so I guess you have to live with it ;)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Mar 9, 6:57 am, Jim Higson j...@wikizzle.org wrote:
On Friday 06 March 2009 15:26:49 kangax wrote:
[...]
It's possible that we'll introduce a custom `hasOwnProperty` in later
revisions.
Makes sense.
if( !hasOwnProperty )
hasOwnProperty = function hasOwnProperty(){ ... };
I was
There's another, less bullet-proof solution, which involves catching
and stopping all click (an possibly keypress) events on links.
That would allow for a custom dialog.
You could always fallback on a regular alert for page refreshes and
the like.
Best,
Tobie
On Mar 9, 9:39 pm, Quleczka
On Mar 9, 9:50 am, webbear1000 normpo...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in your opinions on how I'm handling getters and
setters in classes. Can you see any problems with my approach and what
trouble might I be getting myself into?
The huge body of my programming work has been with
2009/3/9 RobG rg...@iinet.net.au
On Mar 10, 10:20 am, Miguel Beltran R. yourpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list
How can do it when I press automatic change to next field visible? the
field
can be input=text or input=select.
Use the tab key, it navitates through visible form controls by
21 matches
Mail list logo
