Hi Richard,
thanks for your reply. With
The return is something I've been using since May 2008 with all the
releases and updates since then.
Do you mean you have used the native prototype-return, or did you
alter it, and it still worked?
On Dec 16, 6:04 pm, Richard Quadling
I take that as a no?
On Dec 16, 6:02 pm, bernard bernard.christophe...@gmail.com wrote:
I truly wish some people would take the trouble to buy a javascript book
instead of off-topic-posting in this group... meh.
b.
Intellectual honesty consists in taking ideas seriously. To take ideas
On 17 December 2010 08:32, Luke kickingje...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
thanks for your reply. With
The return is something I've been using since May 2008 with all the
releases and updates since then.
Do you mean you have used the native prototype-return, or did you
alter it, and it
Sounds good. Can you post a link to your source (if you want to share
it and have it on github or something)?
On Dec 17, 11:08 am, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 December 2010 08:32, Luke kickingje...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
thanks for your reply. With
The
On 17 December 2010 08:32, Luke kickingje...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
thanks for your reply. With
The return is something I've been using since May 2008 with all the
releases and updates since then.
Do you mean you have used the native prototype-return, or did you
alter it, and it
On 17 December 2010 10:14, Luke kickingje...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds good. Can you post a link to your source (if you want to share
it and have it on github or something)?
I don't use github. I simply build prototype and then add my patch.
I don't have any unit tests for this either, but my
Ok, that works great. Thank you Richard!
On Dec 17, 11:17 am, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 December 2010 10:14, Luke kickingje...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds good. Can you post a link to your source (if you want to share
it and have it on github or something)?
I don't use
HI to all, firts, gretings, second excuse my english, i'm spanish
native talker, go to thye point
i have a page with severals divs with images that are created dynamic,
what i need i that when the last div is created (lets name newdiv), i
can drag and drop from all the divs existing in the page
HI!
When I create a class with Class.create() and add some methods like
this:
var Database = Class.create({
initialize: function() {
this.name = ;
},
setName: function(name) {
this.name = name;
},
});
Are the methods on the class level, as if I had declared them with
Hi,
Are the methods on the class level, as if I had declared them with
Database.prototype.methodName?
Well, at the prototype level, yes. (class level gets to be
ambiguous, since class methods in many languages are meant to be
ones that are on the *class*, not instances of it; e.g., like
Hi,
Yes or no, depending on what you mean.
You can access the `MyCoolClass` variable inside your code, of course,
as it's defined in the scope that contains the functions you've passed
into `Class.create`. But I'm thinking that's not what you mean.
You can't get the string MyCoolClass, if
Bernard,
1. No need to be offensive. If you think a question is beneath you, by
all means ignore it rather than moaning into everyone's mailbox.
2. This question is almost certainly about Prototype's `Class`
feature, not JavaScript. Yes, if you know JavaScript well you
automatically know the
Ok, thanks T.J.,
I really wanted to get the name of the Class as a string. The reason
is this:
I'm working on a project that lets you create really simple webpages
by adding, editing and removing objects (images, text, ..) to your
page. To structure my code I do 2 things:
1.) I create classes
Hi,
Another option is to give the classes that you're using in this way a
unique ID:
* * * *
(function() {
var uniqueClassIDAllocator = 0;
Class.createSpecial = Class_createSpecial;
function Class_createSpecial() {
var clz = Class.create.apply(Class, arguments);
Hmm, that actually is a really good Idea. I already use my own
Class.create-method as discussed here
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous/browse_thread/thread/b7f516a73fb4113a
, so adding a unique id to this wouldn't be much of an effort. Thanks
again! :)
On Dec 17, 6:43 pm,
Hi,
You *can* use PeriodicalExecutor for this. I'm not sure it buys you
much:
function loopThroughArray(array, interval, callback) {
var index = 0;
setTimeout(process, interval);
function process() {
var rv;
if (index array.length) {
try {
16 matches
Mail list logo
