()),
but I'm sure those are there for a reason, and some
things will probably break (probably in MSIE...).
Is this a known problem? Is there some kind of approved
and safe solution?
I use Prototype 1.6.0.3 and Scriptaculous 1.8.1
(developing on Firefox 3.0.3 on Linux).
--
Bertilo Wennergren http
bit of search turned up this bug which diagnoses the
problem in exactly the same way:
http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8887/tickets/5-builder-node-breaks-xhtml
This should be easy to fix but checking for the MIME
type used, and skipping the upper-casing if it's not
text/html.
--
Bertilo
do we make sure?
There must be a better way. Or not?
Nothing to do with Prototype or scriptaculous, I know, but still...
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group
will be
ready within, say, 100ms, in every modern browser in every kind of
computer under any kind of stress from other processes?
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group
for pointing out this feature. I've been stupidly creating my
own data structures to further describe DOM elements. Now I don't have
to do that.
I use store a lot. It's fast, and seems very safe.
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you
it with Ajax.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/File
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:10, stefan ste...@ott.net wrote:
I've been using prototype for a while now and I quite enjoy it.
However, it seems that with the recent upgrade from 1.6 to 1.7 the
toJSON method on hashes broke (or the way that I'm using it is no
longer supported). Since I could not
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 15:55, code_bloke alastair.yo...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I missing something here but I'm getting unexpected results
observing the submit of a form.
Given form and script below I would have expected that the form would
not submit and the alert to be displayed,
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:35, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
(now that `$break` has been deprecated).
$break has been deprecated? Where is that documented?
What are we supposed to use instead?
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received
, which are not explained
in the Prototype documentation since it would then be huge.
--
Bertilo Wennergren
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
houpdelta houpde...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand, I try to stop Ajax.PeriodicalUpdater but this
not good.
Why ?
[...]
onSucess : function (xhr) {
Try onSuccess.
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you
property of the HTML element goes
pretty close) if they wished.
The Firefox extension Web Developer has the option View generated
source, which actually does that. It can be quite handy at times.
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you
= $$('#errodlg').last(); // :)
Or will that throw an error if there is no element with that id? It's
unnecessary
anyway...
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group
= Effect.SlideDown('d1',{duration:1.0});
return false;
};
});
But that's just a very hasty sketch. Read up on observe.
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype
be lost, or where on the page it is to be
found, or why it's would be so bad to lose it, you're out of luck.
This is all by design.
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 15:12, sclaflin st...@steveclaflin.com wrote:
1. I don't see any reason for the element = $(element) line, other
than possibly for the return value;
It's probably there to cater for MSIE.
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received
do, maybe you could try adding
them to a document fragment first, and then add the document
fragment to the table. Worth a try.
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us
object, you'll get a nasty surprise. So always check if your
object is really an object. (I was bitten by this on several
occasions, and it hurt.)
--
Bertilo Wennergren
berti...@gmail.com http://bertilow.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype
18 matches
Mail list logo