you could probably just add the id to the params object directly before you
pass it to the Ajax.Request
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:13 PM, johnb jbcen...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a small app using sortables where you can re-order within them
but also drag them between different sortables,
If you know the original values of x and y you shouldn't have to know
the current value to use effect.Move if you use mode: 'absolute'
unless I am misunderstanding what you are trying to do, can you
explain in a little bit more detail? (an example would be nice)
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:20
document.observe(dom:loaded, function() {
// initially hide all containers for tab content
$$('div.tabcontent').invoke('hide');
});
Note: you can of course do anything you want in that function. The
function runs when everything is loaded and available to javascript.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009
Is the password-form submit button a return from procBasketEmail.php?
if so then you should observe it in the OnSuccess callback. If that
isn't correct chalk it up to me checking this moments after awakening.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Ashashley.kenner...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the
Try adding e.preventDefault(); instead of Event.stop(e) and let me
know if that works?
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Ashashley.kenner...@gmail.com wrote:
function callProcBasketEmail(e) {
var pars = Form.serialize('email-form');
var myAjax = new Ajax.Updater('email-response',
Maybe this might help. http://www.prototypejs.org/api/element/scrollto
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, DJJQjoll...@hotmail.com wrote:
Oh my god my english was terrible in my post, sorry about that.
I'll try to explain the problem again:
On my php page I have a link a long way down the page,
in either.
I think it is the Event.observe('password-form', 'submit',
callProcBasketPassword); which is not working properly, although I
don't know how to debug it
On Aug 5, 6:48 pm, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Try adding e.preventDefault(); instead of Event.stop(e) and let me
know
Unfortunately I don't know why both errors are caused, can you help
please?
On Aug 5, 9:40 pm, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you getting any Javascript errors? Note: firefox and firebug is
your friend. Don't forget to break on all errors.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:22 AM
in the DOM, not sure where to look for it in
the DOM tab of firebug?
Is this correct?
On Aug 5, 10:06 pm, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
nods when Firebug breaks on the error, check the DOM tab to see the
state at that particular moment.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Alex
McAuleywebmas
, the email-response div gets populated with
the form i'm trying to observe, so the question is, why is the
onSuccess running before the DOM has been updated?
On Aug 5, 10:17 pm, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
actually just checked firebug, best place would be html tab. DOM tab
lists
The only problem with that solution is you provide no degradation to
people without javascript.
On 8/5/09, DJJQ joll...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your solution, but instead I changed a href=# to a
href=javascript:null() and it works like a charm.
On Aug 5, 11:00 pm, Alex McAuley
to be used in
certain cases?
I'm happy that it's working but I would really like to learn the
basics properly.
Thanks anyway for getting me up and running!
Ashley
On Aug 5, 10:32 pm, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
good question. You might change Event.observe( . . . etc
pretty much yes but some shut it off for security reasons
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:01 PM, DJJQjoll...@hotmail.com wrote:
Ok. I thought everyone had javscript by now :)
On Aug 5, 11:39 pm, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
The only problem with that solution is you provide no degradation
to use ajax methods correctly
On Aug 5, 10:48 pm, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
yes but onSuccess shouldn't be called until after the ajax.updater is
completed. Therefore the DOM node should be available at that point.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Alex
McAuleywebmas
)
{
Event.observe('password-form', 'submit',
callProcBasketPassword);
}
});
Event.stop(e);
}
rather than testing for onSuccess?
On Aug 5, 11:07 pm, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, just checked the source. onComplete is where ajax.updater
actually updates the node
Explain lightwindow for me, does it use javascript to display? If so
then post that script too please.
On 8/6/09, Martín Marqués martin.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
We are working on and html page which has a div with id=container
that gets updated when pressing link buttons that are on the top.
I don't know of a plugin like that but shouldn't be too hard to port
On 8/7/09, spielberg inmo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello to the people of the group. It´s my first question. Any one know
abut something like this http://mucur.name/system/jquery_example/ to
prototype?? I need to use the element
You could implement your own reset method on your form object.
On 8/7/09, mr_justin gro...@jperkins.otherinbox.com wrote:
This is in no way a prototype related question, but we've got some
pretty smart JavasScript people on here so I figured I'd pose the
question.
Here's the scenario:
I
.
http://www.stickmanlabs.com/lightwindow/
Nobody uses it?
2009/8/6 DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com:
Explain lightwindow for me, does it use javascript to display? If so
then post that script too please.
On 8/6/09, Martín Marqués martin.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
We are working on and html page
Of course. Shouldn't be really hard to implement your own reset
though. Just keep a hash of initial values and ids (you can use
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/element/identify to give elements w/o
an id one) and upon customreset set them all back. Then if you save
changes to server just update
Give them all a class of 'error' and use $$('error').each('hide')
Note: drycoded on my phone so look those up before using them.
On 8/7/09, trope jtrope...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some code that appears to be a prime candidate for a loop.
How could I wrap this up in one neat little
I can't get to the examples on my phone to check but do the examples
use the event queue? If not that explains it, these effects run
simultaneously and can get tangled unless you use the queue. You
should be able to look event queues up for more info. Note: not all
effects tangle which is why
If you use the script.aculo.us autocompleter the option you need to
set is called tokens which takes either a string or an array of
strings to reset on. Note: I haven't used autocompleter myself just
looked up the info.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Angelinemailangel...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure I understand what you are wanting to do. If you mean drag
from one location and the pop back so it can be dragged again, then
yes you have full control over what happens during and after drags.
Look in the documentation for the various callbacks you have
available.
On 8/10/09, Drr
Revert true then move it in the dom in your droopable callback. Should
work for inline elements.
On 8/14/09, Floyd Resler adexfl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you're right on that. I should have expanded my question. If
the object isn't dropped on a Droppable object, how do I get it to go
Spec and reality often differ.
On 8/18/09, ColinFine colin.f...@pace.com wrote:
On Aug 13, 2:53 pm, Jeztah webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com wrote:
What is the correct Cross browser way to observe a checkbox being
checked or not
I am using
$('hidenonlive').observe('change',function()
I can't help with the solution but since you need serverside
processing anyway why not just do it all serverside?
On 8/18/09, drewB dbats...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, by javascript I mean Prototype API.
A simplified use case is as follows:
A user has selected X pieces of furniture. On a
Yes if your roundtrip is slow then doing it clientside can make it
seem more responsive. There is the issue though of what happens if the
server save fails? Revert your changes? Overall using serverside
output is less troublesome, easier to code, and more robust.
On 8/20/09, drewB
Everything in js is an object. Even function literals.
On 8/22/09, JoJo tokyot...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I use bind? Doesn't the bind function take an object as an
argument? I'm doing this stuff inside a class, not an object.
On Aug 22, 6:15 pm, Gareth Evans agr...@gmail.com wrote:
Use
gah, just looked at the source, I was wrong about that, ignore the last
message I sent.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:41 PM, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
if you feed set() an object it should set multiple key/value pairs at once.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Kevin Porter k
Methinks some code would help us figure out what you are doing and if we can
help.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Mike mikemcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello community,
I'm new here, and any help anyone can provide will be greatly
appreciated.
I am trying to build a set of nested lists, each
I don't think there is one that fires afterward. If you function#defer a
function onsuccess it should have been completed after the defer timeout.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Mojito tokyot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using the Ajax.Updater. I'm looking for the callback that is
executed
See this article:
http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/prototype:how-to-load-scripts-dynamically
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:25 AM, JoJo tokyot...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of loading JS in the head, how do I do includes like
virtually all other languages? Isn't Scriptaculous loading Effects.js
and
It's explained in the link I gave.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Miguel Beltran R. yourpa...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/11 DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com
I've never done this but I'm pretty sure you can use object.extend.
http://api.prototypejs.org/language/object.html#extend-class_method
They do but you'd need to cache each combination of scripts once each.
That's a great way to go about it if you require the same scripts on each
page, or the landing page requires all of them (and then it'd cache the
concat'd and minified version) and you include the lot on each other page no
Never rely on client side validation, that's for convenience for your users,
not security.First, make the functionality works (including security)
without javascript.
Then override the submit button with javascript by observing the submit. In
that event code you submit the form via ajax, hide the
Sounds like your situation is very out of the norm. Usually being able to
manipulate the DOM via JS is sufficient except in debugging situations (in
which case an extension is fine). Good luck figuring out something
different to do.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Kumar kumar.k.re...@gmail.com
Not sure about the major browsers but just read about iPhone
optimiation of pages and viewport is certainly odd in mobile Safari.
Sent from my phone so pardon the spelling errors.
On Sep 24, 2009, at 6:34 AM, KammylandSoftware kammyl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does it perhaps have anything to do
If the id 'editdescription' is added to the DOM it won't have been
processed by the browser OnComplete. You will have to delay the
function.
Sent from my phone so pardon the spelling errors.
On Sep 27, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Steve Marshall ste...@westnet.net.au
wrote:
Hi all. I'm brand-new to
What is returned is the same thing you'd get if you used $('id').
Chain on .identify to get the Id from a DOM node.
On Sunday, January 10, 2010, bill will...@techservsys.com wrote:
The docs say:
Event.element(event) - Element
Returns the DOM element on which the event occurred.
But,
Either should work fine. No need for a variable though. It's what
makes prototype so nice.
Sent from my phone so please pardon any spelling errors.
On Jan 10, 2010, at 11:08 AM, bill will...@techservsys.com wrote:
DJ Mangus wrote:
What is returned is the same thing you'd get if you used
That really should be handled serverside IMO. Otherwise all the data
is downloaded upon initial page call when all you need is one page
worth at that point.
Sent from my phone so please pardon any spelling errors.
On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:20 AM, albert kao albertk...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of
I'm confused. Are you wanting to call up a local file? Or are you
running a webserver on that vista machine?
You really should install a webserver on the machine first and then
ask in the place where they support your server rather than hereas
this question isn't really about prototype.
Sent
.
On Feb 10, 2010, at 12:23 PM, albert kao albertk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 4:13 pm, DJ Mangus d.man...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm confused. Are you wanting to call up a local file? Or are you
running a webserver on that vista machine?
You really should install a webserver on the machine first
Don't see why not though it'd slow down the user experience a bit (not
necessarily a good thing).
Have the onclick block, send data to server, server responds, then in
the Ajax callback send user to the destination via window.location
Note: I haven't done this, it's just an off the top of my
If it becomes easy to contribute to the official page then yes, that's
the ideal answer as it's easier to find. If it wasn't for this group,
I wouldn't have known about your wiki.
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:23 AM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi folks,
As many of you know, we've
That is all i can think of. Quite heavy handed to have such a
transition, but doable. Possibly always have a clone behind the
transitioning element and just morph the opacity of the one on top
anytime you want to change the background.
Btw, the reason morph only effects what it does is that the
What you probably want is other enumerable methods, such as
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/enumerable/any
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:53 AM, sporkit minchuk.j...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to validate that at least one checkbox of 4 has been
selected. The code seems simple enough to me.
What you are looking for is
http://api.prototypejs.org/language/enumerable/prototype/invoke/
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Ran Berenfeld berenfeld...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
Is there a way to do something like $$(xxx).hide() ?
(instead of iteration over the array)
i.e
49 matches
Mail list logo
