Just trust.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Le 29/05/2016 21:59, Matthew Dixon Cowles a écrit :
> >
> > The PSF is a pretty big organization now. (Though I don't seem to be
> > able to find a recent budget to see just how big. Is that a fault in
> > my searching?)
> >
Le 29/05/2016 21:59, Matthew Dixon Cowles a écrit :
>
> The PSF is a pretty big organization now. (Though I don't seem to be
> able to find a recent budget to see just how big. Is that a fault in
> my searching?)
>
> I think that members could have an interest in something more than
> belief in
Please correct me if I get any quoting below wrong, it seems to have
come through a bit confused.
[Steve Holden]
> For Heaven's sake. We elect a board to look after these issues. You
> can't expect to second-guess every deliberation. If you want to do
> that, stand for the board.
[Karl Karsten]
>
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Carl Karsten
wrote:
> > I also used to wonder what was being discussed behind closed doors.
>
> We shouldn't have to wonder. If it really is that boring, fine, but it
> should be up to me to decide how I spend my time.
>
> The posted minutes are just a summary and
> I also used to wonder what was being discussed behind closed doors.
We shouldn't have to wonder. If it really is that boring, fine, but it
should be up to me to decide how I spend my time.
The posted minutes are just a summary and results of the discussions and
votes. They don't tell me what w
On 28 May 2016, at 7:15, Carl Karsten wrote:
All of the people nominated for the PSF board are good people who will
do
good things. If things were running smooth, I wouldn't really care
who
gets elected.
But once again, we see people asking questions due to lack of
transparency.
So once
Before I was on the board, I also used to wonder what was being
discussed behind closed doors. Spoiler alert: it's far less exciting
than you might expect. As Tim Peters once put it: "Exciting as
watching rocks sleep? Yup, but essential - the glory of serving on the
Board isn't for everyone ;-)".
One thing we could do is publish agendas either in full or in part before the
Board meetings. This could give time for members to express opinions and
concerns to the Board.
I am not a current Board member, and won't know until Tuesday if I am going to
be a Board member, and haven't spoken wit
User testing?
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> Stand for the board and make sure it becomes more transparent? S
>
> Steve Holden
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Carl Karsten
> wrote:
>
>> All of the people nominated for the PSF board are good people who will do
>> g
Stand for the board and make sure it becomes more transparent? S
Steve Holden
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Carl Karsten
wrote:
> All of the people nominated for the PSF board are good people who will do
> good things. If things were running smooth, I wouldn't really care who
> gets electe
10 matches
Mail list logo
