Please correct me if I get any quoting below wrong, it seems to have
come through a bit confused.
> For Heaven's sake. We elect a board to look after these issues. You
> can't expect to second-guess every deliberation. If you want to do
> that, stand for the board.
> I have no idea what the individual board members think. Even when
> there is a unanimous vote, I still don't know why they voted that
I too think it's legitimate for members to want to know not just the
"what" but also the "why".
> Because that's what they thought would be in the Foundation's best
The PSF is a pretty big organization now. (Though I don't seem to be
able to find a recent budget to see just how big. Is that a fault in
I think that members could have an interest in something more than
belief in good intentions. The same good intentions can lead
different people to different conclusions.
I bet even Perl programmers have good intentions!
PSF-Community mailing list